Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Simi Healthcare CenterCMS #5557011 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555701 03/17/2025 Simi Healthcare Center 5270 East Los Angeles Avenue Simi Valley, CA 93063
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a fall risk re-evaluation was done on readmission to the facility for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) with prior history of falls. This failure had the potential to result in further fall incidents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's, admission Record (AR), dated 3/17/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was an [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with admitting diagnoses including, acute toxic encephalopathy (a condition characterized by a rapid decline in brain function caused by exposure to toxic substances), lack of coordination, and cervical disc degeneration (a condition that affects the discs in the neck losing their elasticity and cushioning properties over time). During a review of Resident 1's, Health Status Notes (daily nursing notes), dated 12/18-12/22/24, the Notes indicated in part, Resident 1 had a fall incident on 12/18/24. On 12/21/24, the resident complained of right hip pain, bruising and swelling and was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation. Resident 1 was readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the notes failed to indicate that a fall risk re-evaluation of Resident 1 was done on readmission. During a review of Resident 1's, Advance Skilled Evaluation (weekly nursing notes), dated 12/23/25, the Functional Assessment section of the notes indicated, Resident 1's gait is unsteady . balance is poor The notes also indicated further . there were no safety concerns (pertaining to Resident 1's gait and balance). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/17/25 at 11:20 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. DON confirmed staff documentation of Resident 1's fall incident on 12/18/24, ER transfer on 12/21/24 and readmission to the facility on [DATE]. DON also confirmed there was no documentation that a fall risk re-evaluation of Resident 1 was done upon the resident's return to the facility from the hospital and acknowledged that staff should have done it. During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Falls – Clinical Protocol, revised 9/2021, the P&P indicated in part, Monitoring and Follow-Up . 4) If the individual continues to fall, the staff and physician will re-evaluate the situation and consider other possible reasons for the resident's falling (besides those that have already been identified) and will Page 1 of 2 555701 555701 03/17/2025 Simi Healthcare Center 5270 East Los Angeles Avenue Simi Valley, CA 93063
F 0689 re-evaluate the continued relevance of current interventions Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Managing Falls and Fall Risk, revised 12/2007, the P&P indicated in part, Monitoring Subsequent Falls and Fall Risk . 1) The staff will monitor and document each resident's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the risks of falling . 3) If the resident continues to fall, staff will re-evaluate the situation and whether it is appropriate to continue or change current interventions Residents Affected - Few 555701 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 17, 2025 survey of Simi Healthcare Center?

This was a inspection survey of Simi Healthcare Center on March 17, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Simi Healthcare Center on March 17, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.