Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

COLONIAL GARDENS NURSING HOMECMS #5557153 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 3 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Physician 1 and Conservator 1 of an abuse allegation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5).This deficient practice resulted in a delay in potential medical and psychiatric evaluations and resulted in Conservator 1 being unaware of Resident 5's well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage (a slow collection of blood on the surface of the brain that develops over time, without being caused by a severe head injury), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5's cognitive skills (process of thinking) for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 5 required supervision with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene.During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 5 did not have the mental capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 5's Progress Note, dated 9/9/2025 at 10:46 p.m., authored by LVN 11, indicated on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 falsely accused a certified nursing assistant of hitting him. The Progress Note indicated that LVN 11 assessed Resident 5's arm for any bruises, scratches, and discoloration, but found none.During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 1:03 p.m., with LVN 11, LVN 11 stated, on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 refused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11's request to change him and CNA 11 requested LVN 11 to speak to Resident 5. LVN 11 stated she approached Resident 5 in the dining room to ask him when it would be a good time for the staff to change him. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 replied, I do not want to go, they hit me when they do anything. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 did not specify who they were but also complained there were scratches and bruises on his arm. LVN 11 stated she assessed Resident 5's arms and did not find any scratches or bruises. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 did not have any injury to his arms, and she went to Resident 5's room and observed CNA 11 change Resident 5's underwear and nightgown without being hit by any people in the room. LVN 11 stated she did not believe Resident 5's allegation was true. LVN 11 stated she documented the incident in Resident 5's Progress Notes but did not notify Physician 1 and Conservator 1. LVN 11 stated she determined Resident 5's allegation was not considered a change in condition due to Resident 5's behavior of fabricating stories in the past and felt his allegation was not true.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 8:12 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated once a licensed nurse was made aware of an abuse allegation, they were responsible for notifying the resident's physician and their responsible party. The DON stated Physician 1 should have been notified of Resident 5's abuse allegation, including the fact that Resident 5 thought there were scratches and bruises on Page 1 of 6 555715 555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0580 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few his arm. The DON stated notifying Physician 1 would have allowed Physician 1 to order for any medical or psychiatric evaluations and/or medications. The DON stated if Resident 5 were confused, a medical diagnosis such as an infection could have explained the sudden onset. The DON stated, without notifying Physician 1, the necessary evaluation and treatment were delayed. The DON stated in addition to notifying Physician 1, Conservator 1should have been notified to ensure he was aware of what was going on with Resident 1. The DON stated Conservator 1 was responsible for making any medical decisions for Resident 1 and may advocate for other assessments and/or treatments.During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 2/2021, the P&P indicated, Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status.During a review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan- Abuse Investigation and Reporting, initiated 7/1/2025, the Improvement Plan indicated the goal was for staff to inform the Administrator and the DON promptly about any incidents and report any abuse allegations immediately to the three government agencies. The Improvement Plan indicated the licensed nurse would initiate the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR- a communication tool used by healthcare workers when there is a change of condition among the residents) and notify the primary physician and the resident and/or their responsible party. 555715 Page 2 of 6 555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation to the State Agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]), the ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and local law enforcement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5).This deficient practice resulted in a delayed notification to CDPH, the ombudsman, and law enforcement and also resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection This deficient practice had the potential to result in potential abuse to all residents in the facility.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage (a slow collection of blood on the surface of the brain that develops over time, without being caused by a severe head injury), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5's cognitive skills (process of thinking) for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 5 required supervision with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene.During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 5 did not have the mental capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 5's Progress Note, dated 9/9/2025 at 10:46 p.m., authored by LVN 11, indicated on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 falsely accused a certified nursing assistant of hitting him. The Progress Note indicated that LVN 11 assessed Resident 5's arm for any bruises, scratches, and discoloration, but found none.During a review of the facility's In-Service Training titled, Abuse Reporting/Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged and Management of Residents with Behaviors, dated 8/16/2025, presented by the Quality Assurance (QA) Nurse, the In-Service indicated LVN 11 received training to report any abuse allegations immediately and up to two hours to the CDPH, the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and local law enforcement. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 1:03 p.m., with LVN 11, LVN 11 stated, on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 refused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11's request to change him and CNA 11 requested LVN 11 to speak to Resident 5. LVN 11 stated she approached Resident 5 in the dining room to ask him when it would be a good time for the staff to change him. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 replied, I do not want to go, they hit me when they do anything. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 did not specify who they were but also complained there were scratches and bruises on his arm. LVN 11 stated she assessed Resident 5's arms and did not find any scratches or bruises. LVN 11 stated the facility's policy indicated any abuse allegations had to be reported to the Administrator (ADM), who was the abuse coordinator, State Agency, the ombudsman, and local law enforcement within two hours. LVN 11 stated she did not report Resident 5's abuse allegation because he did not have any injury to his arms. LVN 11 stated she went to Resident 5's room and observed CNA 11 change the resident's underwear and nightgown without being hit. LVN 11 stated she did not believe Resident 5's allegation was true.During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 2:46 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated LVN 11 was in-serviced on reporting all abuse allegations to the ADM, CDPH, the ombudsman, and law enforcement to ensure a proper investigation was initiated. The DSD stated all abuse allegations had to be reported regardless of if the individual does not believe the allegation to be true.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 8:05 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she was unaware of Resident 5's abuse 555715 Page 3 of 6 555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0609 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few allegation on 9/9/2025. The DON stated per the facility's policy and recent in-services, LVN 11 should have reported the abuse allegation to the ADM who would then initiate an investigation. The DON stated Resident 5 did not specify who hit him, therefore, the alleged perpetrator could have been a staff member or another resident. The DON stated Resident 5's abuse allegation did not have many specifics and without the proper reporting and investigation, Resident 5 and other residents were at risk for further abuse.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 8:58 a.m., with the ADM, the ADM stated he was the abuse coordinator in the facility, and he was responsible for investigating all abuse allegations brought to his attention. The ADM stated all staff members were responsible for notifying him of all abuse allegations and were instructed to notify CDPH, the ombudsman, and law enforcement to ensure all reports were completed within the two-hour window. The ADM stated once Resident 5 informed LVN 11 of being hit, LVN 11 had the responsibility of reporting, not only to him, but to the necessary agencies so an investigation could be initiated. The ADM stated ensuring proper reporting was essential to protecting the residents in the facility.During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, revised 4/2024, the P&P indicated, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management.During a review of the facility's Performance Improvement Plan- Abuse Investigation and Reporting, initiated 7/1/2025, the Improvement Plan indicated the root cause was communication when an incident happened. The Improvement Plan indicated the goal was for staff to inform the Administrator and the DON promptly about any incidents and report any abuse allegations immediately to the three government agencies. The Improvement Plan indicated to monitor this goal daily and monthly, and to track and trend the Change of Conditions for possible abuse allegations. 555715 Page 4 of 6 555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents' (Resident 5) after Resident 5 informed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 11 of an abuse allegation.This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 5's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, delay the delivery of necessary care and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage (a slow collection of blood on the surface of the brain that develops over time, without being caused by a severe head injury), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 5's cognitive skills (process of thinking) for daily decision making were moderately impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 5 required supervision with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene.During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 5 did not have the mental capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 5's Progress Note, dated 9/9/2025 at 10:46 p.m., authored by LVN 11, indicated on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 falsely accused a certified nursing assistant of hitting him. The Progress Note indicated that LVN 11 assessed Resident 5's arm for any bruises, scratches, and discoloration, but found none.During a review of Resident 5's Care Plans, dated 4/17/2025 through 9/11/2025, the Care Plans did not indicated there was a Care Plan that addressed Resident 5's abuse allegation on 9/9/2025.During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 1:03 p.m., with LVN 11, LVN 11 stated, on 9/9/2025, Resident 5 refused Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 11's request to change him and CNA 11 requested LVN 11 to speak to Resident 5. LVN 11 stated she approached Resident 5 in the dining room to ask him when it would be a good time for the staff to change him. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 replied, I do not want to go, they hit me when they do anything. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 did not specify who they were but also complained there were scratches and bruises on his arm. LVN 11 stated she assessed Resident 5's arms and did not find any scratches or bruises. LVN 11 stated Resident 5 did not have any injury to his arms, and she went to Resident 5's room and observed CNA 11 change Resident 5's underwear and nightgown without being hit by any people in the room. LVN 11 stated she did not believe Resident 5's allegation was true. LVN 11 stated she documented the incident in Resident 5's Progress Notes. LVN 11 stated she did not develop or update Resident 5's care plan because she determined Resident 5's allegation was not considered a change in condition due to Resident 5's behavior of fabricating stories in the past and felt his allegation was not true.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 8:29 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated care plans were used as a guideline on how to care for each individual resident and provided an appropriate approach to each problem. The DON stated care plans were used as a communication tool to inform all staff assigned to the residents of the problems, the goals, and the interventions to be done. The DON stated after an abuse allegation was made, the licensed nurse was responsible for developing a care plan that addressed the allegation and to include immediate interventions implemented and other pertinent interventions for the continuation of care. The DON stated Resident 5 did not have a care plan developed after informing LVN 11 of his abuse allegation on 9/9/2025. The DON stated there were no guidelines on how to approach Resident 5's situation. The DON without the necessary care plan addressing Resident 5's abuse allegation, Resident 5 555715 Page 5 of 6 555715 11/14/2025 Colonial Gardens Nursing Home 7246 S. Rosemead Blvd. Pico Rivera, CA 90660
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm was at risk for a delay in delivery of necessary care and services and was at risk for further potential abuse.During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 3/2022, the P&P indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Residents Affected - Few 555715 Page 6 of 6

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

3 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0609GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F609 - The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that:

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • 0580GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F580 - Notification of Changes

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 14, 2025 survey of COLONIAL GARDENS NURSING HOME?

This was a inspection survey of COLONIAL GARDENS NURSING HOME on November 14, 2025. The surveyor cited 3 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at COLONIAL GARDENS NURSING HOME on November 14, 2025?

Yes, 3 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.