Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

ARCADIA CARE CENTERCMS #5557292 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 1, a resident with dementia (loss of thinking, memory, and social abilities), was safely escorted to an outside appointment at GACH 1 for one of five sampled residents.This deficient practice resulted in the resident's safety being put at risk.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 to the facility on 8/18/2025 with diagnoses that included hypertension (a condition when the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), epilepsy (cell activity in the brain is disturbed), and unspecified dementia (cognitive [ability to understand and process thoughts] decline). During a review of Resident 1's History & Physical Examination -V2 (H&P), dated 8/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 8/25/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximal assistance with walking 10 feet and was dependent for transfers. During a phone interview on 9/9/2025, at 10:40 a.m., with Family (FAM 1), FAM 1 stated Resident 1 had an appointment on 9/2/2025 at 12:30 p.m. at GACH 1. FAM 1 stated FAM 1 arrived at GACH 1 at 12:20 p.m. FAM 1 stated when FAM 1 arrived at GACH 1, Resident 1 was with provider and Resident 1's wheelchair was there, but no escort was there. FAM 1 stated Resident 1 had another appointment across the street at another office on the same day to have staples removed from Resident 1's head. FAM 1 stated FAM 1 did not see an escort. FAM 1 felt it was unsafe for Resident 1 to be left alone because Resident 1 has dementia. FAM 1 stated Resident 1 was left at the appointment site with Resident 1's medical documents. During an interview on 9/10/2025, at 3:26 p.m., with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated the facility will always send an escort, but they also ask the family if family will be available. LVN 1 stated, We don't send them without an escort. LVN 1 stated the only reason that residents will go without an escort is if the family meets them at the appointment or family will meet at the facility and then they go to an appointment. LVN 1 stated it is important to make sure the resident is safe, and that they come back, or there is not an incident of losing the resident and the resident arrives safely. LVN 1 stated LVN 1 is unsure if there is a written Policy stating that, but this is what LVN 1 hopes they're doing it and it's the protocol. During an interview on 9/10/2025, at 4:04 p.m., with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated staff escort the resident to the appointment and back, if needed. The SSD stated if the resident had a dementia diagnosis, the resident would need an escort. The SSD stated most of the residents in the facility go with an escort. The SSD stated the escort remains at the appointment and returns with the resident unless the family is going to meet them there and the family is okay with taking care of the resident. The SSD stated they must wait for the family before leaving and they can't just leave them there. The SSD stated it is important for safety. The SSD stated that when the Director of Staff Development (DSD) arranges for transportation and an escort, the DSD looks for if the resident needs physical help, a wheelchair, and if the resident is confused Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 555729 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555729 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/10/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Arcadia Care Center 1601 S Baldwin Ave. Arcadia, CA 91007 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete or forgetful. During an interview on 9/10/2025, at 4:14 p.m., with the DSD, the DSD stated that Resident 1 was called in to see the doctor and the escort, Escort (ESC 1) stated to the nurse Resident 1's daughter would be coming. During an interview on 9/10/2025, at 5:56 p.m., with Social Services Assistant (SSA), the SSA stated it was determined by email communication, dated 8/28/2025, that Resident 1 needed an escort to ride with her because Resident 1's daughter would meet them at the appointment. The SSA stated that most likely they wait for the family to meet them at the appointment before leaving. The SSA stated if the escort needs to leave, they will call family for an estimated time of arrival (ETA) to the appointment. The SSA stated for the most part escort remains with the patient. The SSA stated it is important for the safety of the resident, so the resident is not alone. During a phone interview, on 9/10/2025, at 6:27 p.m., with ESC 1, ESC 1 stated that Resident 1's daughter was not there. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P), titled, Transportation and Appointments, revised December 2023, the policy and procedure indicated our facility will assist residents in arranging transportation and escort (as indicated for resident with cognitive impairment, diagnosis of Dementia and/or resident's needing physical assistance with transfers and mobility) to/from appointments including when necessary. A member of nursing staff or social services will accompany the resident when the resident's family is not available. Event ID: Facility ID: 555729 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555729 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/10/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Arcadia Care Center 1601 S Baldwin Ave. Arcadia, CA 91007 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0808 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were served as ordered for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 had a Physician's Order (PO) for no additional salt. This failure had the potential to result in an increased blood pressure (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high) due to increased salt levels.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 to the facility on 8/18/2025 with diagnoses that included hypertension (a condition when the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), epilepsy (cell activity in brain is disturbed), and unspecified dementia (cognitive [ability to understand and process thoughts] decline). During a review of Resident 1's History & Physical Examination -V2 (H&P), dated 8/19/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 8/25/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required supervision and touching assistance with eating. A review of the Order Summary Report, dated 8/31/2025, the Order Summary Report indicated that Resident 1's diet order was CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate/NAS (no additional sodium/salt), regular texture, and regular liquid. During a phone interview on 9/9/2025, at 10:40 a.m., with Family (FAM 1), FAM 1 stated the Dietary Supervisor (DS) told FAM 1 that Resident 1 requested additional salt with meals and Resident 1 was provided with salt packets. FAM 1 stated Resident 1 had high blood pressure and should not receive salt. During a phone interview on 9/10/2025, at 1:01 p.m., with FAM 2, FAM 2 stated Resident 1 has a seizure when Resident 1's blood pressure is high. FAM 2 stated Resident 1 should not be given salt. During an interview on 9/10/2025, at 3:08 p.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated to follow physician diet orders. During an interview, on 9/10/2025, at 4:55 p.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated that Resident 1's diet orders were a regular diet, and no added salt. The DS stated Resident 1 always asks for additional salt. The DS stated Resident 1 was so mad. The DS stated Mrs. Dash (salt free seasoning) was offered as an alternative and Resident 1 refused it. The DS stated resident 1's preferences were followed. During a subsequent interview on 9/10/2025, at 5:10 p.m., with the DS, the DS stated that the DS did not have documentation that the DS communicated with FAM 1 or FAM 2 that additional salt packets were provided to resident. The DS stated the DS did not have documentation that the DS informed the physician that Resident 1 requested additional salt packets. The DS stated Resident 1's diet order indicated do not give Resident 1 no additional salt. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P), titled, Diet/Therapeutic Diets, revised October 2017, the policy and procedure indicated diets and therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. If the resident or the resident's representative declines the recommended therapeutic diet, the interdisciplinary team will collaborate with the resident or representative to identify possible alternatives. Event ID: Facility ID: 555729 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • 0808GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F808 - Therapeutic Diets

    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 10, 2025 survey of ARCADIA CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of ARCADIA CARE CENTER on September 10, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at ARCADIA CARE CENTER on September 10, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.