Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SANTA FE HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLCCMS #5557321 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555732 05/17/2025 Santa Fe Heights Healthcare Center, LLC 2309 N Santa Fe Ave Compton, CA 90222
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate resident supervision (oversight), and monitoring was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Residents 1), who was at high risk for elopement (leaving the facility without permission and supervision). This failure resulted in resident eloping the facility on 5/16/2025 and placed the resident at risk for missing scheduled medications, exposure to hot weather, accidents and other complications that can lead to severe injuries, hospitalization and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness where individuals experience symptoms of both schizophrenia and a mood disorder), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), and anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent fear or worry.) During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/21/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 does not have the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Residents 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/7/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene. The MDS indicates Resident 1 required supervision or touching assistance with transfer (moving between surfaces to and from bed, chair, and wheelchair) and bed mobility (how resident moves from lying to turning side to side.) During a review of Resident 1 ' s Elopement Evaluation, dated 4/7/2025 the evaluation indicated Resident 1 had history of elopement or had attempted to leave the facility without informing staff. The evaluation indicated Resident 1 had verbally expressed the desire to go home. The evaluation indicated Resident 1 wanders. During a review of Resident 1 ' s progress notes, dated 4/17/2025 the progress notes indicated Resident 1 ' s wander guard bracelet (a bracelet monitor) was checked and Resident 1 stated, I took it out, it ' s heavy and I don't like it. Resident 1 stated, I've learned my lesson, I will not leave without telling anyone. The progress notes indicated the Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] group of Page 1 of 2 555732 555732 05/17/2025 Santa Fe Heights Healthcare Center, LLC 2309 N Santa Fe Ave Compton, CA 90222
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few healthcare professionals, including resident/ resident representative, working together to provide residents with needed care), asked the resident if she has plan of exiting the facility and resident stated, No, I've learned my lesson. The progress notes indicated the IDT will continue with frequent visual check with the resident every shift. During a review of Resident 1 ' s care plan titled Resident 1 ' s Wander guard applied on 4/14/2025 was removed by the resident. The resident requested not to put it back. It's heavy and the resident doesn't like it, dated 4/17/2025, one of the care plan interventions indicated frequent visual check of Resident 1 ' s whereabouts within the facility. During an interview on 5/17/2025 at 10:31 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I went to shop for fresh fruits and vegetables, went to different stores and I had lunch at Ihop restaurant. Resident 1 stated I spent the entire day shopping. Resident 1 stated I put the chair and sneaked out from the window. Resident 1 stated, I have no injuries. I am okay. Resident 1 stated, I did not tell anybody. Resident 1 stated, I called my sister to tell her about my shopping, then I came back to the facility. During an interview on 5/17/2025 at 3:30 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated the frequent visual checks described in Resident 1 ' s care plan meant that Resident 1 needed to be checked every two hours. LVN 2 stated the care plan needs to be precise with every how many hours Resident 1 need to be visually checked. LVN 2 stated the visual check should be documented in the resident ' s clinical record. LVN 2 stated Resident 1 should always be monitored because she is at risk forelopement and injuries while outside the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/17/2025 at 3:55 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s care plan titled Resident 1 ' s Wander guard applied on 4/14/2025 was removed by the resident. The resident requested not to put it back. It's heavy and the resident doesn't like it, dated 4/17/2025, was reviewed. The DON stated Resident 1 refused to wear the wander guard. The DON stated the care plan indicated frequent visual monitors which means Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and charge nurses should be monitoring Resident 1 to know where she is always at. The DON stated the care plan was not clear. The DON stated frequent visual checks should specify how often Resident 1 needed to be monitored for Resident 1 ' s safety, and to deliver high quality care. The DON stated the risk of not being specific with monitoring isResident 1 will not get the supervision she needs and can lead to another episode of elopement. During a review of the facility ' s P&P titled Care Plans- Comprehensive, dated 9/2010, the P&P indicated an individualized care plan should include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident ' s medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated 2007, the P&P indicated resident safety, supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. The P&P indicated when accident hazards are identified, the QA&A/Safety Committee shall evaluate and analyze the cause and develop strategies to mitigate or remove the hazards to the extent possible. 555732 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 17, 2025 survey of SANTA FE HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC?

This was a inspection survey of SANTA FE HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC on May 17, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SANTA FE HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC on May 17, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.