Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

BAYSHIRE CARLSBADCMS #5557451 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555745 03/21/2025 Bayshire Carlsbad 3140 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008
F 0697 Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for pain management for one of three residents (Resident 1), for pain when: Residents Affected - Few 1. Non-pharmalogical interventions (NPI- any intervention intended to improve the health or the well-being of individuals that do not involve the use of any drugs or medicine) were not consistently provided prior to pain medication being administered; and 2. Pain medication doses were not administered according to the pain scale ranges level (scale to indicate level of pain 0=no pain, 10 =greatest pain), indicated by the physician. These failures had the potential for pain medication to not necessarily be required and for pain medication doses to be over or under administered. Findings: According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included neoplasm of bronchus and lung (a cancerous tumor that originates in the airways {bronchi} or lung tissue). On 3/21/25, an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a complaint. Resident 1 was no longer at the facility and had been transferred out on 3/8/25. On 3/21/25 Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. According to the Admissions Minimum Data Set, (MDS-a clinical assessment tool) dated 3/1/25, Resident 1 had a cognitive score of 13, indicating cognition was intact. The Pain Assessment section indicated frequent pain with a pain scale of 9 within the past 5 days. According to the facility's admission Pain Assessment Evaluation, dated 2/22/25, indicated chronic pain with the use of pharmalogical medication and non-pharmalogical interventions, such as rest or re-positioning relieved pain. 1. According to the physician's order, dated 2/22/25, Monitor for the presence of pain every shift using scale 0-10. Use non-pharmacological pain intervention-every shift using: 0-No pain observed. 1-reposition/limb elevation. 2-reassure/emotional support. 3-Provide distraction/diversionary activities. 4-Exerises/range of motion/ambulating/stretching. 5-Rest period/quiet environment. 6-Deep Page 1 of 3 555745 555745 03/21/2025 Bayshire Carlsbad 3140 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008
F 0697 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few breathing/relaxation exercises. 7. Guided Imagery/medication. 8. Laughter/socialization. 9-music. 10-Other, document in progress note. The Medication Administration Record for Resident 1 was reviewed from 2/22/25 through 2/28/25. Non-pharmalogical interventions were attempted 3 out of 23 opportunities. Pain medication was administered 20 times throughout the same period. The Medication Administration Record for Resident 1 was reviewed from 3/1/25 through 3/8/25. Non-pharmalogical interventions were attempted 5 out of 19 opportunities. Pain medication was administered 24 times throughout the same period. According to facility's the care plan, titled Pain, dated 2/22/25, interventions included: Monitor and provide Non-Pharmacological interventions as applicable, and Notify physician if interventions were unsuccessful. There was no documented evidence in the nursing progress notes, that NPIs were unsuccessful. An interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) on 3/21/25 at 11:30 A.M. LN 1 stated non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) were something nurses could perform prior to administering pain medication. LN 1 stated NPIs had no risk involved and could lessen pain, and the pain medication might not be required. LN 1 stated pain medication had risk of side effects and could lead to dependency. LN 1 stated NPIs should always be attempted before administering pain medications, especially if it was a physician's order. An interview was conducted with LN 2 on 3/21/24 at 11:41 A.M. LN 2 stated NPIs should always attempted prior to administering pain medication. LN 2 stated the importance of NPIs was to provide comfort and pain relief, because pain medication might not be required after the NPIs. LN 2 stated it was aways important to follow the physician's order. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/21/25 at 11:55 A.M. The DON stated NPIs were important to apply, before giving pain medication. The DON stated she did not believe NPIs would have been helpful for Resident 1, who had chronic pain. The DON stated if the physician ordered it, it should be attempted, or the physician's order should have been revised. According to the facility's policy, titled Pain-Clinical Protocol, dated October 2022, .Treatment/Management: .2. The physician will order appropriate non-pharmacological and medication interventions to address the individual's pain . 2. According to the physician's order, date 2/22/25, Oxycodone (pain medication that treats moderate to severe pain with a high risk for addiction and dependence) 10-325 milligrams (mg) give 1/2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for moderate pain, 4-6 scale, and Oxycodone 10-325 mg give 1 tablet by mouth for moderate to severe pain, 5-10 scale. The Medication Administration Record for Resident 1 was reviewed from 2/22/25 through 2/28/25. Oxycodone ½ tablet for moderate pain 4-6 scale was administered 2/23/25 at 8:07 A.M., for a documented pain level of 8. Oxycodone 1 tablet was administered for a moderate to severe 5-10 scale on 2/27/25 at 1:49 P.M., 555745 Page 2 of 3 555745 03/21/2025 Bayshire Carlsbad 3140 El Camino Real Carlsbad, CA 92008
F 0697 for a documented pain level of 4. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm According to the care plan, titled Pain, dated 2/22/25, interventions included Administer pain medication as per orders. Monitor and record pain characteristics as ordered to include Severity 1-10 scale. Anatomical location. Onset/Duration as needed. Residents Affected - Few An interview was conducted with LN 1 on 3/21/25 at 11:30 A.M. LN 1 stated pain scale levels and pain medication needed to be followed, according to the physician's order. LN 1 stated if not followed, there was a risk of pain not being relieved, being over medicated, and even addiction. An interview was conducted with LN 2 on 3/21/24 at 11:41 A.M. LN 2 stated it was very important to follow the physician's order related to pain medication administration. LN 2 stated if giving more pain medication then required, it could lead to medication dependance or a higher tolerance, which could be harmful. An interview was conducted with the DON on 3/21/25 at 11:55 A.M. The DON stated she expected nurses to follow the physician orders related to pain medication administration. The DON stated there was a potential risk of addiction and the physician should have been notified that the order was not followed. According to the facility's policy, titled Pain-Clinical Protocol, dated October 2022, .Treatment/Management: .4. If the physician determines that opioid medication is an appropriate option for managing acute (or in some cases chronic) pain in the resident, the lowest possible effective dose is prescribed fore the shortest time possible . 555745 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0697GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F697 - Pain Management

    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 21, 2025 survey of BAYSHIRE CARLSBAD?

This was a inspection survey of BAYSHIRE CARLSBAD on March 21, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at BAYSHIRE CARLSBAD on March 21, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.