F 0604
Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled
residents (Resident 1) was free from physical restraints. * The Facility failed to ensure Resident 1 had a
physician's order, consent, and completed assessment prior to the use of the right hand mittens.
Additionally, the facility failed to initiate a care plan when the right hand mitten was provided to Resident 1.
These failures posed the risk for Resident 1 and her responsible party not to be informed of her treatment
and potentially compromising the resident's independence and psychosocial well-being.Findings: Review of
the facility's P&P titled Use of Restraints revised 12/2007 showed the restraints shall only be used for the
safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully.
Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff
convenience, or for the prevention of falls. Examples of the devices that are/may be considered physical
restraints include leg restraints, arm restraints, hand mitts, soft ties or vest, wheelchair safety bars,
geri-chairs, and lap cushions and trays that the resident cannot remove.Prior to placing a resident in
restraints, there shall be a pre-restraining assessment and review to determine the need for restraints. The
assessment shall be used to determine possible underlying causes of the problematic medical symptom
and to determine if there are less restrictive interventions (programs, devices, referrals, etc.) that may
improve the symptoms.Restraints shall only be used upon the written order of a physician and after
obtaining consent from the resident and/or representative (sponsor). The order shall include the following:a.
The specific reason for the restraint (as it relates to the resident's medical symptom);b. How the restraint
will be used to benefit the resident's medical symptom; andc. The type of restraint, and period of time for
the use of the restraint.Care plans for residents in restraints will reflect interventions that address not only
the immediate medical symptom(s), but the underlying problems that may be causing the symptom(s). Care
plans shall also include the measures taken to systematically reduce or eliminate the need for restraint use.
On 8/6/25 at 1320 hours, Resident 1 was observed in bed with bilateral bedrails by the head of the bed and
had a mitten on the right hand. On 8/6/25 at 1325 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2
stated Resident 1 had been using the right hand mitten to prevent the resident from pulling her
tracheostomy. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/6/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/29/25, showed Resident 1 had no
capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE],
showed the resident had no functional limitation in her range of motion in both upper and lower extremities.
Review of Resident 1's Health Status Notes dated 8/1/25 at 1115 hours, showed the resident had hand
mitten on. Review of Resident 1 Order Summary Report dated 8/6/25, failed to show a physician's order for
Resident 1's use of the right hand mittens. Further review of Resident 1's medical records failed to show
documentation if Resident 1 was
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
555751
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0604
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
assessed and any least restrictive measures were implemented prior to the application of the right hand
mitten. Additionally, there was no care plan problem initiated when Resident 1 was provided with the right
hand mitten. On 8/6/25 at 1441 hours, an interview and a concurrent record review was conducted with RN
1. RN 1 verified Resident 1's medical record failed to show a consent was obtained, an assessment was
completed, and the least restrictive measures were provided prior to the use of the right hand mitten. RN 1
also verified a care plan was not developed to address Resident 1's use of the right hand mitten. On 8/8/25
at 1035 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Family Member 1. Family Member 1 stated when
she went to visit Resident 1, Resident 1 already had a right hand mitten on. Family Member 1 further stated
she did not give any consent for the staff to apply the right hand mitten to Resident 1. On 8/8/25 at 1145
hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and DON. The Administrator and DON was
informed and acknowledged the above findings.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive
plan of care to reflect the individualized respiratory care needs for one of five sampled residents. * The
facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed to address Resident 1's episodes of pulling out the
tracheostomy tube, putting the nasal cannula in the mouth, biting the cannula, and chewing the oxygen
tubing. This failure had the potential for not providing Resident 1 the appropriate, consistent, and
individualized care and negatively impact the resident's health and well-being.Findings: Review of the
facility's P&P titled Care Plan (undated) showed the facility develops a comprehensive care plan for each
resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and
psychological needs. The comprehensive care plan has been designed to:a. Incorporate identified problem
areas;b. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems;c. Build on the resident's strengths;d.
Reflect treatment goals and objectives in measurable outcomes;e. Identify the professional services that
are responsible for each element of care;f. Prevent declines in the resident's functional status and/or
functional levels; andg. Enhance the optimal functioning of the resident by focusing on a rehabilitation
program. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/6/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/29/25, showed Resident 1 had no
capacity to understand and make decisions. The H&P examination further showed Resident 1 had
tracheostomy and using supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident 1's Health Status Notes showed the
following:- dated 7/27/25 at 1827 hours, resident self-decannulated; - dated 7/28/25 at 0112 hours, since
initial night rounds resident was observed biting own cannula multiple times and had caused a
displacement of the oxygen;- dated 7/28/25 at 0213 hours, resident was observed chewing the oxygen
tubing; - dated 7/30/25 at 1815 hours, the RT observed a white cap in the resident's back of the throat;
however, two other RT came to help and saw nothing;- dated 7/30/25 at 1837, the RT reported about the
patient possibly chewing and swallowing the trach lavage port;- dated 8/1/25 at 1115 hours, Resident 1's
tracheostomy tube was found halfway out; and- dated 8/2/25 at 1429 hours, the white cap were found on
7/31/25 in the resident's mouth. Review of Resident 1's plan of care failed to show if the facility developed a
care plan problem to address resident's behavior of pulling out the tracheostomy tube, putting nasal
cannula in the mouth, biting the cannula, and chewing the oxygen tubing. On 8/6/25 at 1120 hours, a
telephone interview was conducted with Family Member 1. Family Member 1 stated when she visited
Resident 1 on 7/27/25 at 1730 hours, Resident 1 was observed with excessive respiratory secretion and
coughing more than usual. Family Member 1 stated she called the RT to suction the resident. The RT came
and found Resident 1's tracheostomy tube was out and did not know for how long. Family Member 1 stated
the RT was unable to put the tracheostomy tube back because the stoma had closed. Family Member 1
further stated when she visited Resident 1 on 7/31/25, she observed Resident 1 was chewing on
something. She had called for the RT to check the resident and found a piece of white cap inside the
resident's mouth. On 8/6/25 at 1441 hours, an interview and a concurrent record review was conducted with
RN 1. RN 1 verified resident got decannulated on 7/27/25. RN 1 verified Resident 1's plan of care failed to
show a care plan was developed to address Resident 1's pulling out the tracheostomy tube, putting nasal
cannula in the mouth, and biting own cannula, and chewing the oxygen tubing. On 8/6/25 at 1510 hours, an
interview and a concurrent record review was conducted with the DON. The DON verified Resident 1's
Health Status Notes as above and there was no care plan developed to address the concerns regarding
Resident 1's respiratory supplies. The DON stated a care plan should have
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
been developed to ensure the appropriate care was provided for Resident 1. On 8/8/25 at 1145 hours, an
interview was conducted with the Administrator and DON. The Administrator and DON was informed and
acknowledged the above findings.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services was
provided to one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) who was at risk for fall. * The facility failed to notify
the physician and responsible party, and initiate a care plan when Resident 1 had an incident where her
head was found hanging on the bed. This failure had the potential for the delay in providing the necessary
care and services and posed a risk for Resident 1 to sustain serious injury.Findings: Review of the facility's
P&P titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting (undated) showed all accidents or
incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be
investigated and reported to the administrator. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department
director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. The
following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form:a. The date and time
the accident or incident took place;b. The nature of the injury/illness (e.g., bruise, fall, nausea, etc.);c. The
circumstances surrounding the accident or incident;d. Where the accident or incident took place;e. The
name(s) of witnesses and their accounts of the accident or incident; Review of Facility's P&P titled Change
in a Resident's Condition or Status revised 12/2016 showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident,
his or her Attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition
and /or status. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has
been an accident or incident involving the resident. Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk,
Managing revised on 03/2018 showed based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify
interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and
try to minimize complications from falling. The section for Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls
and Fall Risk showed the staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered
fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of
falls. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/6/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/29/25, showed Resident 1 had no capacity to
understand and make decisions. On 8/7/25 at 1147 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1
stated on 7/29/25, he remembered Resident 1 was leaning towards the right side of the bed and the RT
asked for his assistance to reposition Resident 1. CNA 1 thinks the medication nurse was aware. When
asked for Resident 1's position, CNA 1 stated the head and chest towards the right side, leaning close
towards the bed. CNA 1 further stated he did not remember everything. On 8/7/25 at 1200 hours, an
interview was conducted with LVN 4. LVN 4 stated Resident had no episode of fall in his shift and did not
hear or received a report of Resident 1 falling. On 8/7/25 at 1205 hours, a telephone interview was
conducted with Family Member 1. According to Family Member 1, she was informed by a family member
who stated, Resident 1 was left with her head hanging on the floor and the legs were still on the bed on
7/27/25 at approximately 1840 hours. Family Member 1 further stated she was not informed of the incident
until 8/6/25. On 8/7/25 at 1357 hours, an interview was conducted with Family Member 2 who visited a
resident in the same room as Resident 1. Family Member 2 stated on 7/29/25 as he walked in the room, he
saw a medical personnel went out of the room. He observed Resident 1 with her head hanging off the bed
and touching the floor. Family Member 2 stated no one had returned to the room after 10 minutes, and the
resident head was still hanging; he thought the medical personnel called for help for the resident. Family
Member 2 further stated he went out the door to call for someone to help
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Resident 1. Family member 2 stated two facility staff came in to assist the resident. Family Member 2
further stated he reported the incident to the Administrator a day or two after, then to the DON the following
day. Review of Resident 1's Health Status Notes showed the following:- dated 8/6/25 at 1932 hours, Family
Member 1 reported an incident to the nurse. According to Family Member 1 she was told by a visitor of an
incident where Resident 1's head tilted downwards and dangling from the bed, after several minutes the
facility staff came and repositioned Resident 1 back to bed in safe position. The note further showed the RN
and LVN completed a full body assessment and there were no new findings to report;- dated 8/6/25 at 1951
hours, the nurse was told by Family Member 1 Resident had a fall on a Tuesday (7/29/25) evening around
1900 hours. The note further showed a body assessment was performed on Resident 1 and there were no
new visible wounds, swelling or bruising; and- dated 8/6/25 2100 hours, a new order was received from the
physician for Resident 1 to go to the acute care hospital for further evaluation of the neck. Further review of
Resident 1's medical record failed to show documentation of a fall incident on either 7/27/25 or 7/29/25. In
addition, the medical record failed to show if the physician and responsible party were notified, and a care
plan was initiated when Resident 1 had an incident where her head was found hanging on the side of the
bed. On 8/7/25 at 1610 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated
he was informed by Family Member 2 about Resident 1 was observed with the head hanging on the floor.
The Administrator stated Family Member 2 told him Resident 1 was assisted already by the nurses. The
Administrator further stated he checked, and the resident was in bed already. The Administrator
acknowledged he did not check or asked a nurse of what had happened or if Resident 1 was assessed or
the physician and family was informed. On 8/8/25 at 1145 hours, an interview was conducted with the
Administrator and DON. The Administrator and the DON was informed and acknowledged the above
findings.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0700
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a
resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed
consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the
necessary care/services were performed prior to the use of the bedrails for one of five sampled resident
(Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 had a physician's order, consent, and assessment
prior to the use of the bilateral upper bedrails. Additionally, the facility failed to initiate a care plan when the
bilateral upper bedrails were provided to Resident 1. These failures had the potential to put Resident 1 at
risk for serious injury.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Proper Use for Bed Rails revised 8/2022
showed the use of the bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for use of the bed rails have been met. The
use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising the side rails for episodic use during care) is
prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives,
interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. Prior to the installation or use of a
side or bed rail, alternatives to the use of side or bed rails are attempted. The resident assessment also
determines potential risks to the resident associated with the use of bed rails, including the following:a.
Accident hazards:(1) The resident could attempt to climb over, around, between, or through the rails, or
over the foot board; and/or (2) A resident or part of his/her body could be caught between rails, the
openings of the rails, or between the bed rails and mattress.b. Restricted mobility:(1) Hinders residents from
independently getting out of bed thereby confining them to their beds; (2) Creates a barrier to performing
routine activities such as going to the bathroom or retrieving items in his/her room, eating, hydration and/or
walking; (3) Decline in resident function, such as muscle functioning/balance; and/or( 4) Skin integrity
issues.c. Psychosocial outcomes: (1) Creates an undignified self-image and alters the resident's
self-esteem; (2) Contributes to feelings of isolation; and/or (3) Induces agitation or anxiety.Before using bed
rails for any reason, the staff shall inform the resident or representative about the benefits and potential
hazards associated with bed rails and obtain informed consent. The following information will be included in
the consent:a. The assessed medical needs that will be addressed with the use of bed rails;b. The
resident's risks from the use of bed rails and how these will be mitigated;c. The alternatives that were
attempted but failed to meet the resident's needs; andd. The alternatives that were considered but not
attempted and the reasons. On 8/6/25 at 1320 hours, Resident 1 was observed in bed with the bilateral
upper bedrails elevated. On 8/6/25 at 1325 hours, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated
Resident 1 had been using the bilateral upper bedrails to prevent Resident 1 from falling. Medical record
review for Resident 1 was initiated on 8/6/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of
Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/29/25, showed Resident 1 had no capacity to understand and make
decisions. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed resident had no functional
limitation in her range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident 1's Order
Summary Report dated 8/6/25, failed to show a physician's order for Resident 1's use of the bilateral upper
bedrails. Further review of Resident 1's medical records failed to show documentation if Resident 1 was
assessed and any least restrictive measures were implemented prior to the application of the bilateral
upper bedrails. Additionally, there was no care plan problem initiated to address Resident 1's use of the
bilateral upper bedrails. On 8/7/25 at 1426 hours, an interview and concurrent record review was conducted
with the DON. The DON verified Resident 1's medical record failed to show documentation of the
assessment,
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555751
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center
2570 Newport Blvd
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0700
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
physician's order, and informed consent prior to Resident 1's use of the bilateral upper bedrails. On 8/8/25
at 1145 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and DON. The Administrator and DON
was informed and acknowledged the above findings.
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555751
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8