Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

MILPITAS CARE CENTERCMS #5557571 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555757 01/09/2025 Milpitas Care Center 120 Corning Avenue Milpitas, CA 95035
F 0880 Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow it's Policy and Procedure titled Isolation-Initiating Transmission- Based Precautions, when the facility failed to implement the transmission-based precautions for isolation precaution (process of creating barriers between people and germs to help prevent the spread of infectious microbes) when residents develop signs and symptoms of productive cough and suspected of respiratory illness during the outbreak for five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5). This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease to other residents and staff at the facility. Residents Affected - Some Findings: During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:08 a.m., with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IP), the IP stated in March 2024 about eight to nine residents with symptoms of runny nose and cough were reported. The IP stated they notified the doctor to get an order for cough and an order for isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak then placed residents on isolation. During a review of the Long-Term Care Respiratory line list (an excel spreadsheet of all persons involved in the outbreak) the spreadsheet indicated, nine (9) residents had respiratory symptoms (runny nose and cough) from 3/5/24 to 3/7/24 during the respiratory illness outbreak. The spreadsheet indicated 1 staff member had respiratory related symptoms on 2/24/24. 1. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR communication (a structured communication tool that stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation.) dated 3/04/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident was noted to have a persistent cough, non-productive. During a review of Resident 1's physician's order dated 3/11/24, physician's order indicated, guaifenesin (used to relieve chest congestion) oral liquid 100 milligram (mg, unit of measure)/5 milliliter (ml) give 10 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for cough/congestion for 14 days. There was no documented evidence for Resident 1 was on isolation precautions during respiratory illness outbreak. During a review of Resident 1's Care plan dated 3/05/24, Care plan indicated, Resident has persistent non-productive cough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/24 at 11:20 a.m., with the IP, she stated there was no physician order of isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak for Resident 1. IP stated there should have a physician order for isolation precaution. The IP stated, there was no evidence documenting Resident 1 was placed on isolation during the respiratory illness outbreak. Page 1 of 3 555757 555757 01/09/2025 Milpitas Care Center 120 Corning Avenue Milpitas, CA 95035
F 0880 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some 2. During a review of Resident 2's SBAR communication dated 3/06/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident was noted with productive cough. During a review of Resident 2's physician's order dated 3/06/24, physician's order indicated, guaifenesin liquid 100 mg/5 ml give 10 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for cough/congestion for 14 days. There was no documented evidence for Resident 2 was on isolation precautions during respiratory illness outbreak. During a review of Resident 2's Care plan dated 3/06/24, Care plan indicated, Resident has productive cough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/24 at 11:21 a.m., with the IP, she stated there was no physician order of isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak for Resident 2. IP stated there should have an order for isolation precaution. The IP stated there was no documented evidence for Resident 2 was placed on isolation during the respiratory illness outbreak. 3. During a review of Resident 3's SBAR communication dated 3/07/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident was noted with productive cough. During a review of Resident 3's physician's order dated 3/07/24, physician's order indicated, guaifenesin liquid 100 mg/5 ml give 10 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for cough/congestion for 14 days. There was no documented evidence for Resident 3 was on isolation precautions during respiratory illness outbreak. During a review of Resident 3's Care plan dated 3/07/24, Care plan indicated, Resident has productive cough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/24 at 11:22 a.m., with the IP, she stated there was no physician order of isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak for Resident 3. IP stated there should have an order for isolation precaution. The IP stated, there was no documented evidence Resident 3 was placed on isolation during the respiratory illness outbreak. 4. During a review of Resident 4's SBAR communication dated 3/07/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident was noted with productive cough. During a review of Resident 4's physician's order dated 3/07/24, physician's order indicated, guaifenesin oral liquid 100 mg/5ml give 10 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for cough/congestion for 14 days. There was no documented evidence for Resident 4 was on isolation precautions during respiratory illness outbreak. During a review of Resident 4's Care plan dated 3/07/24, Care plan indicated, Resident has productive cough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/24 at 11:23 a.m., with the IP, she stated there was no physician order of isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak for Resident 4. IP stated there should have an order for isolation precaution. The IP stated there was no documented evidence Resident 4 was placed on isolation during the respiratory illness outbreak. 5.During a review of Resident 5's SBAR communication dated 3/07/24, the SBAR indicated, Resident 555757 Page 2 of 3 555757 01/09/2025 Milpitas Care Center 120 Corning Avenue Milpitas, CA 95035
F 0880 noted with productive cough during shift. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During a review of Resident 5's physician's order dated 3/07/24, physician's order indicated, guaifenesin liquid 100 mg/5 ml give 10 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for cough/congestion for 14 days. There was no documented evidence for Resident 5 was on isolation precautions during respiratory illness outbreak. Residents Affected - Some During a review of Resident 5's Care plan dated 3/07/24, Care plan indicated, Resident has productive cough. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/10/24 at 11:24 a.m., with the IP, she stated there was no physician order of isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak for Resident 5. IP stated there should have an order for isolation precaution. The IP stated, there was no documented evidence Resident 5 was placed on isolation during the respiratory illness outbreak. During a review of the facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 2001, the P&P indicated, 6. Outbreak management a. Outbreak management is a process that consists of: . (3) preventing the spread to other residents . During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Isolation-Initiating Transmission- Based Precautions, the P&P indicated, Transmission-Based Precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection .1. If the resident is suspected of, or identified as, having a communicable disease, the charge nurse or nursing supervisor notifies the infection preventionist and the resident's attending physician for evaluation of appropriate transmission-based precautions . 555757 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0880GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F880 - Infection Control

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 survey of MILPITAS CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of MILPITAS CARE CENTER on January 9, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at MILPITAS CARE CENTER on January 9, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.