Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

OCEAN PARK HEALTHCARECMS #5557862 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555786 02/24/2025 Ocean Park Healthcare 2828 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90405
F 0552 Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three (Resident 2) received care and support through informed, deliberative decision making that promote respect for the values, needs, and interests through bioethics committee (crucial advisors, assisting with ethical decision-making in complex situations) by serving as decision makers on behalf of Resident 2 and providing psychoactive medication without consent. Residents Affected - Few This deficient practice violated the residents' right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychoactive medications. Findings: During a record review, Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included psychosis (severe mental disorder that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (Excessive worry or fear, Feeling tense or on edge, Difficulty concentrating, Irritability, and Feeling overwhelmed), and Parkinson ' s (chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects the brain's ability to control movement) During a record review, Resident 2's History and Physical report completed on 9/17/2024, indicated Resident 2 could make needs known but cannot make medical decisions. During a record review, Resident 2s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 9/17/2024, indicated Resident 2 ' S cognition was severely impaired. During a record review, Resident 2 ' s Physicians Order summary report dated 9/17/2024, indicated the following medications orders: 1. Depakote Sprinkles capsule 125 give 2 capsules by mouth in the morning for mood Disorder manifested by (m/b) sudden outburst of anger that interferes with activities of daily living (ADL). 2. Lorazepam Tablet 1 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for increased agitation/aggression m/b yelling and throwing. 3. Mirtazapine tablet 15mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression m/b poor oral (po) intake. Page 1 of 5 555786 555786 02/24/2025 Ocean Park Healthcare 2828 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90405
F 0552 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few 4. Risperdal oral tablet 1mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for schizoaffective disorder m/b striking out and yelling that interferes with ADL care. 5. Invega Sustenna (Intramuscular [into muscle] suspension pre-filled syringe 156mg/1ml inject 156mg/ml intramuscularly one time day starting on the 9/27/2024 and ending on the 27th every month for psychosis (m/b) restlessness and persistently pacing that interfere with her ADL care. During record review, Resident 2's informed consent dated 9/17/2024, indicated the facility obtained informed consent for, Depakote, Lorazepam, Mirtazapine, Risperdal and Invega Sustenna. The informed consent listed the Resident ' s physician was signed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP), Activity Director (AD) and SSD. did not include the name of the physician who obtained the informed consent. The informed consent had no names or signatures verifying with the resident or resident's, responsible party (RP) and/or that the physician obtained informed consent prior initiation of therapy. During record review, Resident 2 ' s record indicated facility applied for probate conservatorship investigation for Resident 2 on 9/18/2024. During record review, Resident 2 ' s record indicated a letter dated 10/01/2024 received from Department of Mental Health (DMH) acknowledging receipt of facilities probate conservatorship investigation application, also indicated on the letter was the name and contact of the Senior Public Guardian (Sr. DPG) assigned to investigate if Resident 2 qualified for probate conservatorship. During a telephone interview on 2/27/2025 at 3:50 PM, the Sr. DPG stated a letter was sent to the facility on [DATE] indicating Resident 2 did not qualify for probate conservatorship. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 2:55 PM Social Services Assistant (SSA) stated SSA received a letter dated 10/01/2024 from the DMH acknowledging receipt of Resident 2 ' s probate conservatorship application that listed the name and contact of the assigned investigator. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 3:00 PM Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facilities Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of health professionals from different disciplines who work together to treat a patient) was making medical decisions for Resident 2. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 4:13 PM DON stated she was not sure Resident 2 had a bioethics committee, DON stated she was unsure Resident 2 ' s doctor was aware Resident 2 had no surrogate decision maker, guardian, next of kin and/or legal representative, DON also stated facility had applied for legal guardianship from department of mental health was awaiting response. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 5:15 PM DON stated Resident 2 to did not have and should have had a Bioethics committee in place. DON stated the importance of a bioethics committee is to discuss patient ' s condition, overall health and to come up with a comprehensive plan of care for the Resident 2. DON stated plan of care could not be properly coordinated, complex decision could be delayed for Resident 2 by not having a Bioethics committee for the Resident 2. During a record review, the facility Policy and Procedures (P&P) titled Unrepresented Residents dated 12/2023 indicated, It is the policy of this facility to support a resident ' s right to have a legally-recognized representative to participate in care decisions. When there is not available 555786 Page 2 of 5 555786 02/24/2025 Ocean Park Healthcare 2828 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90405
F 0552 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm decision-maker, and the resident lacks capacity to make medical decisions, the resident is considered unrepresented and the following procedure will be followed .Unrepresented Residents who present with complex healthcare or psychosocial needs, and who experience a change in condition wherein non-routine medical decisions must be met, are referred to the facility ' s Bioethics Committee for interdisciplinary case review prior to initiating, withholding or changing treatment which requires a physician ' s order. Residents Affected - Few 555786 Page 3 of 5 555786 02/24/2025 Ocean Park Healthcare 2828 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90405
F 0600 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately separate residents after a report allegation of physical abuse (willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Abuse, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Revised 4/2021, by failing to protect resident from possible further abuse for a resident-to-resident altercation. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further elder abuse. Findings: During a record review, Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/27/023 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough), generalized muscle weakness (feeling weak in most areas of the body), and metabolic encephalopathy (a brain condition that occurs when there ' s an imbalance of chemicals in the blood). During a record review, Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P - physician ' s examination of the patient0 dated 11/28/2024, indicated Resident 1 had altered mental status to understand and make decisions. During a record review, Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/30/2024, indicated Resident 1 had cognitive impairment (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday life). The MDS indicated Resident 1 required partial/moderate staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs- activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily). During a record review, the facility ' s census dated 2/23/2024, indicated Resident 1 and Resident 2 remained in the same room where the resident-to-resident altercation happened on 2/19/2025. During an interview on 2/24/2025, at 12:50 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that on 2/19/2025 at 3:45 A.M., Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) called her a few minutes after the incident stating that Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the hand. The DON stated she spoke with both Resident 1 and Resident 2, but both Resident 1 and Resident 2 did not seem to recall the incident and so the facility did not conduct a room change for Resident 1 and/or Resident 2. The DON further stated that Resident 1 and Resident 2 were cognitively impaired, could make needs known but were unable to make sound decisions. The DON stated that the facility process after a resident-to-resident altercation, the residents involved in the altercation are immediately separated to prevent escalation or reoccurrence of the incident and further aggression that can cause injury to the resident/s. During a record review, the facility P&P, titled Abuse, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised 4/2021, indicated the resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consist of a facility wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 555786 Page 4 of 5 555786 02/24/2025 Ocean Park Healthcare 2828 Pico Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90405
F 0600 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm b. other residents . Residents Affected - Few 10. Protect residents from any further harm during investigations. 555786 Page 5 of 5

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0552GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F552 - Planning and Implementing Care

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • 0600GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F600 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 24, 2025 survey of OCEAN PARK HEALTHCARE?

This was a inspection survey of OCEAN PARK HEALTHCARE on February 24, 2025. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at OCEAN PARK HEALTHCARE on February 24, 2025?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.