Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Sherwood Oaks Post AcuteCMS #5557942 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 2 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555794 10/09/2024 Sherwood Oaks Post Acute 250 Fairview Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91361
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a care planned intervention to monitor the intake and output of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Residents Affected - Few This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experince negative outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 had a urinary tract infection on 6/22/24, with an intervention for staff to Monitor intake and output. During a concurrent record review and interview, on 10/9/24, at 4:21 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and Medical Records Director (MRD 1), Resident 1's Care Plan was reviewed. The DON 1 and the MRD 1 verbalized they were unable to provide documentation indicating Resident 1's care planned intervention to monitor intake and output was carried out by staff. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2001, indicated in part A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy further indicated in part The comprehensive, person-centered care plan .describes the services that are to be furnished. Page 1 of 2 555794 555794 10/09/2024 Sherwood Oaks Post Acute 250 Fairview Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91361
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for catheter care, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). Residents Affected - Few This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience negative outcomes including an increased risk for developing urinary tract infection(s). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/9/24, starting at 4:30 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and the Medical Records Director (MRD 1), Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), was reviewed. Resident 1's TAR indicated in part Resident 1 had a physician order of Indwelling catheter: Monitor for change in urine character .every shift for f/c (foley catheter) management. The physician order was active from 5/30/24 to 8/23/24. Resident 1's TAR indicated missing/blank entries on 6/8/24, 6/17/24, 7/2/24, 7/5/24, 7/7/24, 7/19/24, 7/21/24, 7/28/24, 7/29/24, 7/30/24, 7/31/24, 8/8/24, 8/12/24, 8/13/24. The DON 1 and MRD 1 confirmed the missing entries. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/9/24, starting at 4:30 p.m., with the DON 1 and the MRD 1, Resident 1's TAR was reviewed. Resident 1's TAR indicated in part Resident 1 had a physician order to Monitor proper placement, no kinking or compression that could obstruct urine flow to a gravity bag during catheter care Q (every) shift every shift for f/c management. The physician order was active from 5/30/24 to 8/23/24. Resident 1's TAR indicated missing/blank entries on 6/8/24, 6/17/24, 7/2/24, 7/5/24, 7/7/24, 7/19/24, 7/21/24, 7/28/24, 7/29/24, 7/30/24, 7/31/24, 8/8/24, 8/12/24, 8/13/24. The DON 1 and MRD 1 confirmed the missing entries. 555794 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

2 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 9, 2024 survey of Sherwood Oaks Post Acute?

This was a inspection survey of Sherwood Oaks Post Acute on October 9, 2024. The surveyor cited 2 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Sherwood Oaks Post Acute on October 9, 2024?

Yes, 2 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.