Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

PINE CREEK CARE CENTERCMS #5558011 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555801 08/09/2023 Pine Creek Care Center 1139 Cirby Way Roseville, CA 95661
F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity were promoted for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) for a census of 98 when Resident 1 and Resident 3 were left in urine-soaked briefs and Resident 2 lay in a wet brief on the transfer lift sling (a mesh or padded fabric material with belt straps to attach to the lift hooks) in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 1 staying in a cold brief and feeling insignificant, and increased the potential for developing skin issues for the residents who were confused. Findings: During a phone interview on 8/7/23 at 8:45 a.m., the complainant stated on 7/25/23, when she began her shift, the residents in her care had not been changed, but left soaked wet in urine when she started her night shift duty. The complainant stated the previous shift Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, who was from a registry agency, did not change the residents' briefs or answer the residents call lights during the PM shift. In an interview on 8/7/23 starting at 11:10 a.m., the Director of Staff Development /Assistant Director of Nursing (DSD/ADON), with the Staffing Coordinator (SC) present, stated the wet briefs issue was brought up to Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, the PM shift nurse on 7/25/23. The DSD stated LN 1 and LN 2, the night shift nurse, immediately checked on the residents that CNA 1 had been assigned to and found almost all residents were not changed and had been left in wet briefs. The SC stated most of the residents were confused or fairly confused in the section; therefore, there were no complaints from the residents about the wet briefs. However, the SC stated the facility took it as residents' dignity and care issue. In an interview on 8/7/23 at 12:52 p.m., in the activity room, Resident 1 was in her wheelchair among other residents. Resident 1 stated recently she was left in a soaking wet brief for a long period during the night. Resident 1 stated she used the call light for help, but no one answered so she had to stay in a wet brief. Resident 1 stated the wet brief felt cold and waiting for help in a wet brief made her feel insignificant. Review of Resident 1's clinical record, care plan for Skin: At risk for skin breakdown ., reviewed 6/12/23, included interventions to Keep the call light within reach and encourage resident to call for assistance .Monitor for incontinence and provide pericare every shift and after each incontinence episode. Page 1 of 2 555801 555801 08/09/2023 Pine Creek Care Center 1139 Cirby Way Roseville, CA 95661
F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few In a telephone interview on 8/7/23 at 3:37 p.m., LN 1 stated she worked the PM shift on 7/25/23 with CNA 1. LN 1 stated she was supposed to sign CNA 1 off at the end of the shift as she was from a registry company but was not able to locate her when the shift changed. LN 1 stated, She [CNA 1] was gone. LN 1 recounted that the night shift CNA complained to her at around midnight that the residents had not been changed during the PM shift. LN 1 went room to room and checked the residents and found Resident 2 was in a wet brief and laying on the transfer lift sling in her bed. LN 1 stated CNAs were supposed to remove the sling after the resident was transferred back in bed, but the sling was not removed. LN 1 indicated Resident 2 was confused and unable to tell staff to remove the sling underneath her and stated had she not checked the resident, Resident 2 could have been laying on the transfer sling all night. LN 2 stated, That was unacceptable .That was not right .they were dignity issues. Review of the facility's policy and procedure, Dignity, revised February 2021, stipulated, Each resident shall be care for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem .Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. 555801 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0550GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F550 - Resident Rights

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 9, 2023 survey of PINE CREEK CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of PINE CREEK CARE CENTER on August 9, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at PINE CREEK CARE CENTER on August 9, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her right..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.