Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

VICTORIA POST ACUTE CARECMS #5558041 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555804 04/17/2024 Victoria Post Acute Care 654 S. Anza El Cajon, CA 92020
F 0624 Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Residents Affected - Few As a result, Resident 1 was inappropriately discharged to an independent living facility (ILF; a residence for individuals who have the mental capacity to live independently without medical or physical assistance with their daily living tasks) that placed Resident 1 at risk for harm and/or injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 2/16/24 to an ILF with diagnoses that included a history of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) with behavioral disturbances. A record review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical dated 9/1/23 completed by Resident 1 ' s medical doctor (MD) indicated .This resident does NOT have the capacity to understand and make decisions . A record review of Resident 1 ' s quarterly rehabilitation screen dated 12/19/23 indicated .Pt (patient) [sic] continues with cognitive (the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding) impairment that dec (declines) [sic] her safety and awareness . A record review of Resident 1 ' s MD note dated 1/22/24 was conducted. The MD note indicated .She is wandering about and trying to get to a locked unit [sic] followed by Psychiatry.confused and not able to follow directions . A record review of Resident 1 ' s MD note dated 1/25/24 was conducted. The MD note stated .She still is really confused [sic] and we are trying to get her to a locked unit for dementia . A record review of Resident 1's discharge (completed for the purpose of discharging the resident) Minimum Data Set (MDS- used to develop a plan of care) dated 2/16/24, indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- cognitive status 0-7 severe impairment, 8-12 moderately impaired, 13-15 cognitively intact) score of 0 out of 15 points. A record review of Resident 1 ' s discharge MDS dated [DATE] included information on Resident 1 ' s usual performance with self-activities of daily living (ADL: skills required to manage one's basic physical needs, including personal hygiene or grooming, dressing, toileting, transferring or Page 1 of 2 555804 555804 04/17/2024 Victoria Post Acute Care 654 S. Anza El Cajon, CA 92020
F 0624 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm ambulating, and eating). The information was gathered within the last three days before Resident 1 was discharged . Per this record, Resident 1 was not fully independent with ADLs. Resident 1 required moderate assistance (helper lifts, holds, or supports trunks [torso] or limbs [arms, legs] but provides less than half the effort) with self-care ADLs that included showering, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and tub/showering transfers. Residents Affected - Few A record review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record related to self-medication administration (the ability of an individual to administer his/her own medication) was conducted. There were no records that indicated Resident 1 was evaluated for safe self-medication administration. On 4/15/24 at 10:46 A.M., an interview was conducted with the social services director (SSD). The SSD stated she assisted the case manager with discharge placements. The SSD stated that residents who discharged to an ILF were usually independent residents who did not require assistance with ADLs, but it was her understanding that the ILF took care of individuals who had dementia. On 4/15/24 at 11:50 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the case manager (CM). The CM stated that Resident 1 was placed in an ILF .because it was the cheapest option. The CM reviewed Resident 1 ' s discharge notes and stated that Resident 1 was discharged to the ILF with her belongings and medications but was unable to find documentation related to safety evaluations for self-administration of medications. The CM stated Resident 1 had dementia with memory loss, required cueing (prompting/reminder), and was eating and walking independently without supervision when Resident 1 was at the facility. The CM stated it was determined that an ILF was considered because she thought the ILF provided 24-hour resident care, and that options such as locked units or assisted living were not available, and/or had wait lists. The CM stated, I think we should have looked at other safety concerns to evaluate such as self-medication administration, ADLs, and their [residents in facility] mental capacity prior to discharging our residents. The CM concluded that the safest discharge option would have been for Resident 1 to be discharged to a locked unit or an assisted living that specialized in dementia care. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 4/16/24 at 12:45 P.M. The DON stated that Resident 1 had memory deficits (loss) because of dementia, was able to walk around independently, and was not evaluated for self-medication administration or other safety evaluation because Resident 1 only required queuing. The DON acknowledged Resident 1 was not fully independent with ADLs and that an ILF was the last resort for Resident 1 to be discharged to. The DON acknowledged that the safest option would have been for Resident 1 to discharge to a locked unit for dementia care. A review of facility's discharge policy and procedure dated 1/20/22, Discharge Planning Process Policy, indicated .1b. Ensure that the discharge needs for each resident are identified on admission. 4. The Facility shall document, complete on a timely basis based on the resident ' s needs, and include in the clinical record, the evaluation of the resident ' s discharge needs and discharge plan . e. Consider . and the resident's .capacity and capability to perform required care, as part of the identification of discharge needs . 555804 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0624GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F624 - Transfer and discharge-

    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 17, 2024 survey of VICTORIA POST ACUTE CARE?

This was a inspection survey of VICTORIA POST ACUTE CARE on April 17, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at VICTORIA POST ACUTE CARE on April 17, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.