F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally
mandated resident assessment tool) assessment was accurate for one resident (Resident 1), when
Resident 1's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a set of medical orders, based on a
patient's preferences, that guide medical care for individuals with serious illnesses) form information was
different from the information documented on Resident 1's MDS assessment.This failure could result in
inappropriate care and treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that
contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of April2025 and
she was her own responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care
and financial matters).A review of Resident 1s MDS assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was
admitted to the facility with a medically complex condition (a broad category of illnesses, diseases, or
impairments that require extensive and ongoing medical care, often involving multiple body systems and
comorbidities). Section S California POLST indicated Resident 1 had chosen for staff to attempt
resuscitation/ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency treatment that's done when someone's
breathing or heartbeat has stopped), full treatment (indicating the patient wishes to receive all medically
appropriate and available treatments to prolong life, including interventions like mechanical ventilation,
intensive care, and other life-sustaining measures), and opted for a trial period of artificial nutrition which
can include the use of a feeding tube (FT, a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot
obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation).A review of
Resident 1's signed POLST form, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 chose Do not Resuscitate (DNR, a
medical order instructing healthcare provider not to perform CPR if a patient's breathing or heartbeat
stops), selective treatment (indicating the patient wants medical conditions treated while avoiding
burdensome measures. This option prioritizes treating the immediate medical issue but avoids measures
like prolonged life support, intensive care, or invasive procedures such as intubation or mechanical
ventilation), and no artificial means of nutrition including feeding tubes.During a concurrent interview and
record review on [DATE] at 11:04 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set coordinator (MDSC), Resident 1's MDS
assessment section S, dated [DATE], was reviewed. The MDSC verified Resident 1's MDS section S
indicated Resident 1 had chosen attempt resuscitation/ cardiopulmonary resuscitation, full treatment, and
trial period of artificial nutrition including feeding tubes. The MDSC stated MDS assessments should be
accurate and the POLST accuracy in MDS section S was important because it provided direction of care in
case of a medical emergency. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:50 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON)
stated the MDS section S information should be filled in from the POLST form signed by Resident 1 and
the physician. The DON stated if the information did not match, it meant the MDS assessment was
inaccurate. The DON stated inaccurate MDS could result in ineffective care and treatment. During a
telephone interview on [DATE] at 2:58 p.m. the DON
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
555826
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555826
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/29/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Redwoods, A Community of Seniors
40 Camino Alto
Mill Valley, CA 94941
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
verified the information on Resident 1s POLS, dated [DATE], and the MDS assessment section S, dated
[DATE], did not match. The DON confirmed Resident 1's MDS assessment section S dated [DATE] was
inaccurate. The DON stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure on MDS assessment. A review
of the American Association of Post Acute Care Nursing article titled understand the MDS trickle-down
effect dated [DATE], it indicated, . well maintained and accurate source of documentation . are essential for
MDS accuracy.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555826
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555826
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/29/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Redwoods, A Community of Seniors
40 Camino Alto
Mill Valley, CA 94941
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) received treatment and
care in accordance with the facility's Infection Control policy for influenza (flu- an illness caused by a virus
[a germ] that is spread from person to person) when: Licensed Nurses (LNs) did not notify Resident 1's
doctor (MD) that Resident 1 had symptoms of the flu and a report of Resident 1had been exposed to a
family member who tested positive for flu; LNs did not notify the MD the facility ran out of flu tests; LNs did
not place Resident 1 on droplet precautions (measures implemented to prevent the spread of infection
when a person who is infected with a pathogen [germs that cause disease] coughs, sneezes, or
talks);These failures resulted in Resident 1's hospitalization from 4/27/25 up to 5/6/25 where she was
diagnosed with Influenza A and Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF, a serious condition where the
respiratory system can't maintain adequate oxygen levels in the blood, potentially leading to organ
dysfunction), received a new order for supplemental oxygen (additional oxygen to a person who is not
receiving enough oxygen from the air they breathe), and decreased the facility's potential to prevent the
spread of flu among other residents, visitors, and staff.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record
indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at the age of [AGE] years old.A review of
Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/27/25,
indicated the primary reason for Resident 1's admission was due to a medically complex condition (a broad
category of illnesses, diseases, or impairments that require extensive and ongoing medical care, often
involving multiple body systems and comorbidities [simultaneous presence of two or more medical
conditions in a patient]) including a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic
lung disease causing difficulty in breathing),.A review of Resident 1's admission Summary progress note,
dated 4/24/25, indicated Resident 1 presented to the facility with stable (within normal limits [WNL] or
acceptable ranges) vital signs (measurements of the body's most basic functions) including pulse (number
of times the heart beats within a minute) at 94 beats per minute (bpm), and oxygen saturation level (O2 sata measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying as a percentage) at 94% without the use of
supplemental oxygen.A review of Resident 1's nurse health status note, dated 4/24/25 at 4:06 p.m.,
indicated Resident 1's daughter notified Licensed Nurse (LN) A that Resident 1 had been exposed to a
family member who tested positive for flu. The note also indicated Resident 1 had complained of sore throat
and earache earlier that day.A review of Resident 1's nurse health status notes, for dates 4/24/25 and
4/25/25 did not indicate Resident 1's physician was notified that Resident 1 had been exposed to flu, had a
reported symptom consistent with flu, and had not been tested for flu due to the facility not having flu
testing supplies.A review of Resident 1's health status note, dated 4/26/25 at 9:56 p.m., indicated,
[Resident 1's] daughter expressed concern regarding her mother's respiratory status. She requested that
MD be notified regarding her concern that [Resident 1] may have flu.[with] [temperature] 98.7 [Fahrenheit, a
unit of measure] ([Resident 1's] daughter notes that this is a high temp [temperature] for her mother.A
review of Resident 1's health status note, dated 4/27/25 at 2:59 p.m., indicated, .[Resident 1] with elevated
temp noted 99.1 [Fahrenheit].with episode of cough noted.family requesting to see MD; MD will be in on
4-28.A review of Resident 1's incident note, dated 4/27/25 at 11:30 p.m. indicated, .[Resident 1's] daughter
called [facility] at approximately [4:30 p.m.] to report her concern that [Resident 1] had loose stools x2 [two
times]. next call from [Resident 1's daughter] came after approximately one hour.that [Resident 1] had
another loose stool.that [Resident 1] needed to be transferred to ‘the hospital' because ‘you are not doing
anything for her'. [Resident 1] left [facility] with EMS [emergency
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555826
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555826
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/29/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Redwoods, A Community of Seniors
40 Camino Alto
Mill Valley, CA 94941
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
medical services] staff at approximately [7 p.m.].[Resident 1] had resisted having vitals taken.A review of
Resident 1's incident note, dated 5/11/25, indicated, late entry /addendum for 4/27/25: assessment of
time.Timing of [Resident 1's] discharge from [facility] with EMS Paramedic staff is now estimated to be
between [9:15 p.m.] and [9:30 p.m.] .A review of the emergency department (ED, provides unscheduled
outpatient services to patients whose condition requires immediate care) provider note, signed 4/28/25,
indicated on 4/27/25 Resident 1 was, .[brought in by ambulance] from [skilled nursing facility] for concerns
of flu.HR [heart rate, the number of times the heart beats per minute] 140s, [O2 sat] 92% . placed on
[supplemental oxygen].Triage vital signs Temp 99 [Fahrenheit], Heart rate 153, [Respiratory Rate] 35, [O2
sat] 97% [on supplemental oxygen].presenting with shortness of breath. wheezing [a high-pitched sound
made when breathing is restricted/obstructed in the lungs] and rhonchi [low-pitched, continuous, snoring or
gurgling sounds heard in the lungs, resulting from mucus or other secretions obstructing the larger airways]
present. Sepsis [a life-threatening response to infection] was present on arrival, specifically at [9:45
p.m.].ED diagnosis:1. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. 2. Influenza A. A review of Resident 1's Hospital
Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated, . Date of admission: [DATE] Date of discharge:
[DATE].Hospital summary.[Resident 1] with complain [sic] of shortness breath, sore throat, cough.Acute
respiratory failure with hypoxia [condition with low oxygen] and hypercapnia [condition with high levels of
carbon dioxide].Influenza A.COPD with exacerbation [worsening of a disease or its signs and symptoms].
Per [oxygen] eval, [Resident 1] will benefit from PRN [as needed] [supplemental oxygen] to keep [O2 sat]
above 92% .[supplemental oxygen] has been ordered and will be delivered to [home health agency].
[Resident 1] influenza positive.COPD made worse by influenza a. discharge disposition: home with home
health.During an interview on 7/29/25 at 10:20 a.m., LN A stated when a facility received a report that a
resident was exposed to flu, [AD1] the facility would test the resident for flu as a precautionary measure. LN
A acknowledged Resident 1 had not been tested for the flu at the facility because there were no flu test kits
available. LN A stated that since there was no confirmation Resident 1 was positive for flu, Resident 1 could
only be suspected of having the flu virus. LN A stated testing for flu was important to protect the residents
and provide Resident 1 with the appropriate treatment. LN 1 clarified, when a resident tested positive for flu,
the resident should be put on transmission-based precaution (TBP, an infection control measures used in
healthcare settings to prevent the spread of pathogens that can be transmitted through contact with an
infected patient, their body fluids, or contaminated surfaces or objects). LN A added placing a resident who
tested positive for flu on TBP was for everyone's safety and to prevent outbreaks (a sudden increase in the
number of cases of a disease in a specific area or population over a short period). During a concurrent
interview and record review on 7/29/25 at 10:26 a.m. with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP, a
healthcare professional who specializes in preventing and controlling infections in healthcare settings),
Resident 1's nurse health status notes, dated 4/24/25 through 4/25/25, were reviewed. The IP verified
Resident 1's daughter had reported that Resident 1 was exposed to flu. The IP stated that since the family
member told the facility staff Resident 1 was exposed to flu, the facility staff should have tested Resident 1
for flu. The IP stated the flu test was not done on Resident 1 because the facility ran out of flu tests. The IP
stated it was important to do the flu test to determine Resident 1 flu status and to provide appropriate
treatment. The IP verified the nurse health status notes dated 4/24/25 through 4/25/25 did not indicate the
MD was notified Resident 1 was exposed to flu, suspected of having flu since she reported a symptom
consistent with flu, or that the facility was unable to test Resident 1 for flu virus due to facility's lack of flu
test. The IP verified, Resident 1's electronic health
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555826
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555826
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/29/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Redwoods, A Community of Seniors
40 Camino Alto
Mill Valley, CA 94941
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
record did not indicate Resident 1 was placed on any TBP.During a concurrent interview and record review
on 7/29/25 at 11:21 a.m., with the IP, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Infection Control PlanInfluenza, dated 02/2024 was reviewed. The IP verified that based on their flu plan, which the facility
follows, Resident 1 was considered a suspect for flu and should have been tested for flu, placed on droplet
precautions and immediately started on antiviral medication. The IP confirmed that none of those actions
were done for Resident 1. The IP stated it was important to test Resident 1 for flu to know her flu status and
to be able to treat her right away. The IP stated placing Resident 1 on droplet precaution ensures the safety
of everyone and could help prevent outbreaks.During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/29/25
at 11:50 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's nurse health status notes from 4/24/25
through 4/27/25 and Resident 1's electronic medication administration record (EMAR, a digital system used
to track and document the administration of medications, ensuring accuracy and timeliness in medication
delivery) for April 2025 was reviewed. The DON verified Resident 1 should have been tested for flu upon
report she had been exposed to flu and was symptomatic but was not tested due to lack of a flu test kit. The
DON verified that when Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and up to the time Resident 1 was sent out to
the hospital on 4/27/25, Resident 1 was not tested for flu, did not receive any antiviral medications nor was
placed on droplet TBP. The DON confirmed Resident 1 was sent to the ED due to concern from Resident
1's daughter that Resident 1's condition was worsening and the belief that the facility was not taking care of
Resident 1. The DON verified the facility's flu policy and procedure (P&P) was not followed, since Resident
1 was suspected of flu, Resident 1 should had been tested for flu, should have been placed on droplet TBP
and should have been started on antiviral medication.A review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Control
Plan-Influenza (Residents/Patients), last reviewed on 2/2024, the P&P indicated, .Healthcare clinic infection
control lead and clinical staff will evaluate, observed or report residents with symptoms and implement daily
surveillance and/or testing and symptoms screening.LTC [long term care] residents who have confirmed or
suspected influenza should receive antiviral treatment immediately as antiviral treatment works best when
started within the first 2 days of symptoms.communications/notifications to residents physicians.A review of
the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the national public health agency for the United States)
document titled, Treating Flu with Antiviral Drugs, dated 9/11/24, indicated, .Treatment of flu with flu antiviral
medications works best when started within 1-2 days after flu symptoms begin. Flu antiviral drugs can
lessen symptoms and shorten the time you are sick. It's very important that flu antiviral drugs are started as
soon as possible to treat patients who are. at increased risk of serious flu complications based on their age
or underling health conditions, if they develop flu symptoms. For example, people with asthma and chronic
lung disease.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555826
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5