F 0627
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for
a safe transfer/discharge.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate bed hold process was
followed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) reviewed for bed hold. * Resident 42's bed hold was
cancelled prior to the end of the seven-day bed hold. This failure resulted in Resident 42 not being allowed
to return to the facility when Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital. Findings: On 1/23/26,
CDPH received a complaint regarding Resident 42's bed hold being cancelled prior to the end of the
seven-day bed hold. Review of the facility's P&P titled SAU (Subacute Unit) Transfer, Discharge, Bed-hold
Procedure reviewed 9/2025 showed at the time of transfer/discharge, the patient and family member or
legal representative are given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed
hold and readmission criteria after the bed-hold period ends. In addition, the policy showed the SAU allows
a patient whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan to
return to the SAU immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private room even if the patient
has an outstanding Medicaid balance, if the patient requires the services provided by the SAU and is
eligible for Medicaid nursing SAU services. Furthermore, the policy showed if the SAU determines a patient
who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the SAU, cannot return to the SAU, the SAU
complies with the requirements to notify the patient and the patient's representative of the transfer or
discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in language and manner they understand; the SAU
sends a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; the
written notice of transfer/discharge includes: reason for transfer/discharge, effective date of
transfer/discharge, location to which the patient is transferred/discharge, statement that the patient has the
right to appeal the action to the state, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone
number of the entity which resolves such requests and information on how to obtain an appeal form and
assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; name, address, and
telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman, and for patients with intellectual and
developmental disabilities or related disabilities, mailing address and email address and telephone number
of the agency responsible for protection and advocacy of developmentally disabled. On 1/28/2026 at 1544
hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Hospital Case Manager 1. Hospital Case Manager 1
stated their staff informed the facility on 1/18/26, that Resident 42 was ready to return to the facility. Hospital
Case Manager 1 stated Resident 42 was transferred to the hospital on 1/12/26. Hospital Case Manager 1
stated the facility's Administrator told Hospital Case Manager 1 Resident 42 could not return to the facility
unit where he previously resided and there was no available bed for Resident 42. Closed medical record
review for Resident 42 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was
transferred to the acute care hospital on 1/12/26. Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge
Form dated 1/12/26 showed Resident
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 6
Event ID:
555859
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555859
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf
875 N Brea Blvd
Brea, CA 92821
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
42 was transferred to the acute care hospital, and the transfer or discharge was necessary for the
resident's welfare and the needs cannot be met in the facility. Review of Resident 42's SAU Form-Notice of
Bedhold dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42 has left the SAU for a hospitalization or therapeutic leave on
1/12/26 , and elected to hold his bed from 1/12 to 1/18/26. Review of Resident 42's acute care hospital's
progress notes dated 1/18/25, showed on 1/15/25, Resident 42's condition was stable and Resident 42's
return to the facility could start on 1/16/26, if he continued to improve. Further review of the progress note
showed Resident 42's condition was improving so on 1/17/25, Resident 42's plan to return to the facility
could be started. Another progress note dated 1/18/25, showed Resident 42's condition remained stable
and could return to the facility. On 1/29/2026 at 0841 hours, an interview was conducted with the
Administrator. When asked about Resident 42 not being allowed to return to his room on 1/18/26, the
Administrator stated he was told on 1/14/26, by Hospital Discharge Coordinator 1, via telephone, Resident
42 would not be returning to the facility any time soon. The Administrator stated he then cancelled Resident
42's bed hold, discharged Resident 42 from his room, and gave Resident 42's room to another resident.
The Administrator stated the facility's unit only had a total of 14 rooms which were covered by Resident 42's
insurance. When asked when Resident 42 could return to one of the rooms covered by Resident 42's
insurance, the Administrator stated Resident 42 was on a waiting list, waiting for a room to become
available. On 1/30/2026 at 1546 hours, a follow up interview was conducted with the Administrator and the
DON. When asked if the Administrator had further clarified with Discharge Coordinator 1 or any other
hospital staff about what the statements meant regarding Resident 42 would not be returning to the facility
any time soon and the resident would be in the hospital a few more days to be more accurate on a specific
date Resident 42 would be returning to the facility, the Administrator stated, no. The Administrator stated he
took the statements from Discharge Coordinator 1 to mean Resident 42 would not be returning. Therefore,
on 1/14/26, the Administrator gave Resident 42's room to another resident. On 2/4/26 at 1130 hours, a
telephone interview was conducted with Contracts Unit Chief 1. Contracts Unit Chief 1 stated the facility
could hold Resident 42's room for two weeks, from the date of transfer to the acute care hospital, if
Resident 42 was expected to return. When informed of the above findings, Contracts Unit Chief 1
acknowledged and stated the Administrator should not have cancelled Resident 42's bed hold.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555859
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555859
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf
875 N Brea Blvd
Brea, CA 92821
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or
bed-hold policies.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or
resident's representative was provided with the required information when the resident was transferred
and/or discharged for two of three sampled residents (Residents 39 and 42) reviewed for transfer and
discharge. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 39 and/or their representative were notified of the transfer
and reasons for the transfer in writing when the resident was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility. * The
facility failed to provide facility's bed hold policy and notice of transfer when Resident 42 was transferred to
the acute care hospital and was not permitted to readmit to the facility. These failures resulted in the
interested parties not having the complete information related to the discharge and transfer process. In
addition, this failure had the potential for the resident and/or their representative of not knowing about the
appeals process and the circumstances of the resident's transfer/discharge should the resident and/or their
representative believe the transfer or discharge was inappropriate or involuntary.Findings:
Review of the Facility's P&P titled Transfer Discharge Bed-Hold Procedure dated 9/2025 showed the
patient, if known, the family member, surrogate or legal representative, are notified at least 30 days prior to
the transfer, unless the transfer is affected when.patient has not resided in the facility for 30 days. The
Content of the Written Notice included the following:
Reason for transfer/discharge;
Effective date of transfer discharge;
Location to which the patient is transferred discharged ;
Statement that the patient has the right to appeal the action to the state;
Name, address, and telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman; and,
As applicable, mailing address and telephone number of the agency responsible for protection and
advocacy of developmentally disabled or mentally ill individuals.
Medical record review for Resident 39 was initiated on 1/30/26. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on
[DATE].
Review of Resident 39's H&P examination dated 10/10/25, showed Resident 39 had the capacity to
understand choices and make health care decisions.
Review of Resident 39's Physician Order Sheet showed a physician's order dated 11/11/25, for Discharge
to an Assisted Living.
Review of Resident 39' s Progress Notes dated 11/11/25 at 1629 hours, showed Resident 39 was
transferred to an assisted living facility.
Review of Resident 39's Notice of Transfer/discharge date d 11/11/25, showed transfer location as an
assisted living facility and the reason for transfer was because Resident 39's health was improved
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555859
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555859
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf
875 N Brea Blvd
Brea, CA 92821
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
sufficiently so that Resident 39 no longer required the services provided by the facility. Under the section for
the resident or resident representative signature showed the notice was provided to the resident's
representative via telephone and did not show a signature of the resident's representative. The Notice of
Transfer/Discharge showed if you believe that the proposed transfer discharge is inappropriate in your case,
and is involuntary, you have the right to appeal. The appeal can be filed in writing to, or by calling the
following with provided phone number:
DHCS office of administration hearing and appeals TDA/RTR unit.
Stated Long term care ombudsman office.
State agency for developmentally disabled
State agency for mentally ill
The Notice of Transfer Discharge further showed, If you intend to file an appeal of this transfer/discharge, it
is important that you do so within 10 calendar days of being notified. The decision regarding an appeal will
normally be made within 30 days from the date of Notice of Transfer/Discharge. The ability of the
Department of Health to render a decision on the appeal, maybe jeopardized if the appeal is not submitted
within 10 calendar days.
Further review of Resident 39's medical record did not show if the Written Notice of Transfer/Discharge was
provided in writing when Resident 39 was discharged to an assisted living facility on 11/11/25.
On 1/30/26 at 1057 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 39 was
conducted with RN 3. RN 3 verified Resident 39 was discharged to an assisted living on 11/11/25. RN 3
verified Resident 39's representative was informed of transfer discharge notice via telephone. RN 3 further
stated she was not aware if the facility mailed the written Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the resident or
their representative when the residents in the facility were transferred or discharged . RN 3 was not able to
verify if the written notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided to Resident 39's representative when
Resident 39 was transferred to an assisted living facility on 11/11/26.
On 1/30/26 at 1145 hours, an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Director. The Medical
Records Director stated she faxed the Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the Ombudsman; however, she did
not mail the written notice of transfer/discharge if the resident or their representative was unable to sign at
the time of the transfer or discharge. The Medical records Director verified she did not mail the written
notice of Transfer/Discharge to Resident 39's representative when Resident 39 was discharged to an
assisted living facility on 11/11/25.
On 2/2/26 at 0941 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was informed and
acknowledged the above findings.
2. Review of the facility's P&P titled SAU (Subacute Unit) Transfer, Discharge, Bed-hold Procedure reviewed
9/2025 showed at the time of transfer/discharge, the patient and family member or legal representative are
given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed hold and readmission
criteria after the bed-hold period ends. In addition, the policy showed the SAU allows a patient whose
hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan to return to the SAU
immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555859
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555859
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf
875 N Brea Blvd
Brea, CA 92821
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
room even if the patient has an outstanding Medicaid balance, if the patient requires the services provided
by the SAU and is eligible for Medicaid nursing SAU services. Furthermore, the policy showed if the SAU
determines a patient who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the SAU, cannot return to the
SAU, the SAU complies with the requirements to notify the patient and the patient's representative of the
transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in language and manner they understand;
the SAU sends a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care
Ombudsman; the written notice of transfer/discharge includes: reason for transfer/discharge, effective date
of transfer/discharge, location to which the patient is transferred/discharge, statement that the patient has
the right to appeal the action to the state, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone
number of the entity which resolves such requests and information on how to obtain an appeal form and
assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; name, address, and
telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman, and for patients with intellectual and
developmental disabilities or related disabilities, mailing address and email address and telephone number
of the agency responsible for protection and advocacy of developmentally disabled.
Closed medical record review for Resident was initiated on 1/23/26. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility
on [DATE].
Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge Form dated 1/12/26 showed Resident 42 was
transferred to the acute care hospital, and the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's
welfare and the needs cannot be met in the facility.
Review of Resident 42's SAU Form-Notice of Bedhold dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42 has left the SAU
for a hospitalization or therapeutic leave on 1/12/26, and elected to hold his bed from 1/12 to 1/18/26.
Review of Resident 42's Progress Notes dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42's Family Member 2 was called
to inform Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital.
Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge with effective date of 1/12/26, showed on the line for
Resident/Resident Representative Signature that Family Member 2 was informed via telephone regarding
Resident 42's transfer to the acute care hospital. Further review of Resident 42's Notice of
Transfer/Discharge showed the content of this notice included reason for the transfer to the acute care
hospital and the appeal process in case the resident/resident representative believed the discharge was
inappropriate or involuntary.
On 1/30/26, at 1504 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Family Member 2. When asked if she
had received a copy of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge for Resident 42's transfer to the hospital on
1/12/26, Family Member 2 stated, no. When asked if she knew about the contents of the notice of
Transfer/Discharge, Family Member 2 stated no.
On 1/30/26, at 1533 hours, an interview was conducted with RN 3. When asked about providing Resident
42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge, RN 3 stated the notice was given to the medical records staff. When
asked if a copy of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge was mailed to Resident 42's Responsible
Party, RN 3 stated the nursing staff did not mail the notices.
On 1/30/26, at 1543 hours, an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Director. When asked if
medical records staff had mailed the notice of transfer/discharge to Resident 42s Responsible
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555859
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 6
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
555859
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
02/05/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf
875 N Brea Blvd
Brea, CA 92821
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628
Party, the Medical Records Director stated she did not mail a copy of the notice and she thought nursing
staff mailed the copy of the notice of transfer/discharge to Resident 42's Responsible Party.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
555859
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 6