Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

KINDRED HOSPITAL BREA D/P SNFCMS #55585924 citations on this visit
24 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 24 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate bed hold process was followed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) reviewed for bed hold. * Resident 42's bed hold was cancelled prior to the end of the seven-day bed hold. This failure resulted in Resident 42 not being allowed to return to the facility when Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital. Findings: On 1/23/26, CDPH received a complaint regarding Resident 42's bed hold being cancelled prior to the end of the seven-day bed hold. Review of the facility's P&P titled SAU (Subacute Unit) Transfer, Discharge, Bed-hold Procedure reviewed 9/2025 showed at the time of transfer/discharge, the patient and family member or legal representative are given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed hold and readmission criteria after the bed-hold period ends. In addition, the policy showed the SAU allows a patient whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan to return to the SAU immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private room even if the patient has an outstanding Medicaid balance, if the patient requires the services provided by the SAU and is eligible for Medicaid nursing SAU services. Furthermore, the policy showed if the SAU determines a patient who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the SAU, cannot return to the SAU, the SAU complies with the requirements to notify the patient and the patient's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in language and manner they understand; the SAU sends a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; the written notice of transfer/discharge includes: reason for transfer/discharge, effective date of transfer/discharge, location to which the patient is transferred/discharge, statement that the patient has the right to appeal the action to the state, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which resolves such requests and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; name, address, and telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman, and for patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities or related disabilities, mailing address and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for protection and advocacy of developmentally disabled. On 1/28/2026 at 1544 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Hospital Case Manager 1. Hospital Case Manager 1 stated their staff informed the facility on 1/18/26, that Resident 42 was ready to return to the facility. Hospital Case Manager 1 stated Resident 42 was transferred to the hospital on 1/12/26. Hospital Case Manager 1 stated the facility's Administrator told Hospital Case Manager 1 Resident 42 could not return to the facility unit where he previously resided and there was no available bed for Resident 42. Closed medical record review for Resident 42 was initiated on 1/28/26. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was transferred to the acute care hospital on 1/12/26. Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge Form dated 1/12/26 showed Resident (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 6 Event ID: 555859 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555859 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/05/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf 875 N Brea Blvd Brea, CA 92821 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital, and the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the needs cannot be met in the facility. Review of Resident 42's SAU Form-Notice of Bedhold dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42 has left the SAU for a hospitalization or therapeutic leave on 1/12/26 , and elected to hold his bed from 1/12 to 1/18/26. Review of Resident 42's acute care hospital's progress notes dated 1/18/25, showed on 1/15/25, Resident 42's condition was stable and Resident 42's return to the facility could start on 1/16/26, if he continued to improve. Further review of the progress note showed Resident 42's condition was improving so on 1/17/25, Resident 42's plan to return to the facility could be started. Another progress note dated 1/18/25, showed Resident 42's condition remained stable and could return to the facility. On 1/29/2026 at 0841 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. When asked about Resident 42 not being allowed to return to his room on 1/18/26, the Administrator stated he was told on 1/14/26, by Hospital Discharge Coordinator 1, via telephone, Resident 42 would not be returning to the facility any time soon. The Administrator stated he then cancelled Resident 42's bed hold, discharged Resident 42 from his room, and gave Resident 42's room to another resident. The Administrator stated the facility's unit only had a total of 14 rooms which were covered by Resident 42's insurance. When asked when Resident 42 could return to one of the rooms covered by Resident 42's insurance, the Administrator stated Resident 42 was on a waiting list, waiting for a room to become available. On 1/30/2026 at 1546 hours, a follow up interview was conducted with the Administrator and the DON. When asked if the Administrator had further clarified with Discharge Coordinator 1 or any other hospital staff about what the statements meant regarding Resident 42 would not be returning to the facility any time soon and the resident would be in the hospital a few more days to be more accurate on a specific date Resident 42 would be returning to the facility, the Administrator stated, no. The Administrator stated he took the statements from Discharge Coordinator 1 to mean Resident 42 would not be returning. Therefore, on 1/14/26, the Administrator gave Resident 42's room to another resident. On 2/4/26 at 1130 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Contracts Unit Chief 1. Contracts Unit Chief 1 stated the facility could hold Resident 42's room for two weeks, from the date of transfer to the acute care hospital, if Resident 42 was expected to return. When informed of the above findings, Contracts Unit Chief 1 acknowledged and stated the Administrator should not have cancelled Resident 42's bed hold. Event ID: Facility ID: 555859 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555859 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/05/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf 875 N Brea Blvd Brea, CA 92821 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative was provided with the required information when the resident was transferred and/or discharged for two of three sampled residents (Residents 39 and 42) reviewed for transfer and discharge. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 39 and/or their representative were notified of the transfer and reasons for the transfer in writing when the resident was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility. * The facility failed to provide facility's bed hold policy and notice of transfer when Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital and was not permitted to readmit to the facility. These failures resulted in the interested parties not having the complete information related to the discharge and transfer process. In addition, this failure had the potential for the resident and/or their representative of not knowing about the appeals process and the circumstances of the resident's transfer/discharge should the resident and/or their representative believe the transfer or discharge was inappropriate or involuntary.Findings: Review of the Facility's P&P titled Transfer Discharge Bed-Hold Procedure dated 9/2025 showed the patient, if known, the family member, surrogate or legal representative, are notified at least 30 days prior to the transfer, unless the transfer is affected when.patient has not resided in the facility for 30 days. The Content of the Written Notice included the following: Reason for transfer/discharge; Effective date of transfer discharge; Location to which the patient is transferred discharged ; Statement that the patient has the right to appeal the action to the state; Name, address, and telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman; and, As applicable, mailing address and telephone number of the agency responsible for protection and advocacy of developmentally disabled or mentally ill individuals. Medical record review for Resident 39 was initiated on 1/30/26. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 39's H&P examination dated 10/10/25, showed Resident 39 had the capacity to understand choices and make health care decisions. Review of Resident 39's Physician Order Sheet showed a physician's order dated 11/11/25, for Discharge to an Assisted Living. Review of Resident 39' s Progress Notes dated 11/11/25 at 1629 hours, showed Resident 39 was transferred to an assisted living facility. Review of Resident 39's Notice of Transfer/discharge date d 11/11/25, showed transfer location as an assisted living facility and the reason for transfer was because Resident 39's health was improved (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555859 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555859 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/05/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf 875 N Brea Blvd Brea, CA 92821 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few sufficiently so that Resident 39 no longer required the services provided by the facility. Under the section for the resident or resident representative signature showed the notice was provided to the resident's representative via telephone and did not show a signature of the resident's representative. The Notice of Transfer/Discharge showed if you believe that the proposed transfer discharge is inappropriate in your case, and is involuntary, you have the right to appeal. The appeal can be filed in writing to, or by calling the following with provided phone number: DHCS office of administration hearing and appeals TDA/RTR unit. Stated Long term care ombudsman office. State agency for developmentally disabled State agency for mentally ill The Notice of Transfer Discharge further showed, If you intend to file an appeal of this transfer/discharge, it is important that you do so within 10 calendar days of being notified. The decision regarding an appeal will normally be made within 30 days from the date of Notice of Transfer/Discharge. The ability of the Department of Health to render a decision on the appeal, maybe jeopardized if the appeal is not submitted within 10 calendar days. Further review of Resident 39's medical record did not show if the Written Notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided in writing when Resident 39 was discharged to an assisted living facility on 11/11/25. On 1/30/26 at 1057 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 39 was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 verified Resident 39 was discharged to an assisted living on 11/11/25. RN 3 verified Resident 39's representative was informed of transfer discharge notice via telephone. RN 3 further stated she was not aware if the facility mailed the written Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the resident or their representative when the residents in the facility were transferred or discharged . RN 3 was not able to verify if the written notice of Transfer/Discharge was provided to Resident 39's representative when Resident 39 was transferred to an assisted living facility on 11/11/26. On 1/30/26 at 1145 hours, an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Director. The Medical Records Director stated she faxed the Notice of Transfer/Discharge to the Ombudsman; however, she did not mail the written notice of transfer/discharge if the resident or their representative was unable to sign at the time of the transfer or discharge. The Medical records Director verified she did not mail the written notice of Transfer/Discharge to Resident 39's representative when Resident 39 was discharged to an assisted living facility on 11/11/25. On 2/2/26 at 0941 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was informed and acknowledged the above findings. 2. Review of the facility's P&P titled SAU (Subacute Unit) Transfer, Discharge, Bed-hold Procedure reviewed 9/2025 showed at the time of transfer/discharge, the patient and family member or legal representative are given a written notice of the bed-hold policy that specifies the duration of the bed hold and readmission criteria after the bed-hold period ends. In addition, the policy showed the SAU allows a patient whose hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeds the bed-hold period under the State plan to return to the SAU immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555859 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555859 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/05/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf 875 N Brea Blvd Brea, CA 92821 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few room even if the patient has an outstanding Medicaid balance, if the patient requires the services provided by the SAU and is eligible for Medicaid nursing SAU services. Furthermore, the policy showed if the SAU determines a patient who was transferred with an expectation of returning to the SAU, cannot return to the SAU, the SAU complies with the requirements to notify the patient and the patient's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in language and manner they understand; the SAU sends a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; the written notice of transfer/discharge includes: reason for transfer/discharge, effective date of transfer/discharge, location to which the patient is transferred/discharge, statement that the patient has the right to appeal the action to the state, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which resolves such requests and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; name, address, and telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman, and for patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities or related disabilities, mailing address and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for protection and advocacy of developmentally disabled. Closed medical record review for Resident was initiated on 1/23/26. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge Form dated 1/12/26 showed Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital, and the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the needs cannot be met in the facility. Review of Resident 42's SAU Form-Notice of Bedhold dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42 has left the SAU for a hospitalization or therapeutic leave on 1/12/26, and elected to hold his bed from 1/12 to 1/18/26. Review of Resident 42's Progress Notes dated 1/12/26, showed Resident 42's Family Member 2 was called to inform Resident 42 was transferred to the acute care hospital. Review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge with effective date of 1/12/26, showed on the line for Resident/Resident Representative Signature that Family Member 2 was informed via telephone regarding Resident 42's transfer to the acute care hospital. Further review of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge showed the content of this notice included reason for the transfer to the acute care hospital and the appeal process in case the resident/resident representative believed the discharge was inappropriate or involuntary. On 1/30/26, at 1504 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with Family Member 2. When asked if she had received a copy of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge for Resident 42's transfer to the hospital on 1/12/26, Family Member 2 stated, no. When asked if she knew about the contents of the notice of Transfer/Discharge, Family Member 2 stated no. On 1/30/26, at 1533 hours, an interview was conducted with RN 3. When asked about providing Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge, RN 3 stated the notice was given to the medical records staff. When asked if a copy of Resident 42's Notice of Transfer/Discharge was mailed to Resident 42's Responsible Party, RN 3 stated the nursing staff did not mail the notices. On 1/30/26, at 1543 hours, an interview was conducted with the Medical Records Director. When asked if medical records staff had mailed the notice of transfer/discharge to Resident 42s Responsible (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555859 If continuation sheet Page 5 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555859 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 02/05/2026 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Kindred Hospital Brea D/P Snf 875 N Brea Blvd Brea, CA 92821 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0628 Party, the Medical Records Director stated she did not mail a copy of the notice and she thought nursing staff mailed the copy of the notice of transfer/discharge to Resident 42's Responsible Party. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 555859 If continuation sheet Page 6 of 6

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

24 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0552GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F552 - Planning and Implementing Care

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • 0578GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F578 - The right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • 0605GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F605 - Respect and Dignity

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

  • 0628GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F628 - Documentation

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • 0679GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F679 - Activities

    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

  • 0686GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F686 - Skin Integrity

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • 0688GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F688 - Mobility

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • 0697GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F697 - Pain Management

    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

  • 0726GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F726 - Nursing Services

    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

  • 0755GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F755 - Pharmacy Services

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • 0756GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F756 - Drug Regimen Review

    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

  • 0759GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F759 - Medication Errors

    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

  • 0761GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F761 - Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • 0812GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F812 - Food safety requirements

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • 0880GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F880 - Infection Control

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • 0883GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F883 - Influenza and pneumococcal immunizations

    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

  • 0887GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F887 - Infection control

    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.

  • 0908GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F908 - Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe

    Keep all essential equipment working safely.

  • 0344GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

  • 0345GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

  • 0353GeneralS&S Fpotential for harm

    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 5, 2026 survey of KINDRED HOSPITAL BREA D/P SNF?

This was a inspection survey of KINDRED HOSPITAL BREA D/P SNF on February 5, 2026. The surveyor cited 24 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at KINDRED HOSPITAL BREA D/P SNF on February 5, 2026?

Yes, 24 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.