Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTERCMS #5559081 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) received all necessary services including an appointment with his oncologist (a medical professional specializing in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer) as prescribed.This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving an evaluation and treatment plan for resident's non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, a cancer that affects the lymphatic system [a network of organs, vessels and tissues that moves colorless fluid back to the bloodstream]).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-Hodgkin lymphoma , end stage renal disease (ESRD - irreversible kidney failure ), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not provide adequate blood flow to meet the body's needs), and adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity). During a review of Resident 1's General Acute Hospital (GACH) 1 Discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Summary and Transfer Orders, dated 5/6/2025, the Discharge Summary and Transfer Orders indicated Resident 1 had low grade b cell lymphoma (a type of NHL) and will be started on a treatment with rituximab (primarily used to treat various type of cancers) as outpatient. The Discharge Summary and Transfer Orders also indicated a follow up appointment scheduled with Oncologist 1 on 5/9/2025. During a review of Resident 1's Order Listing Report, the Order Listing Report indicated an appointment at GACH 1 on 5/9/2025 at 7:30 AM with Oncologist 1. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 5/9/2025, the Progress Notes indicated Resident 1 was not seen by Oncologist 1 at his appointment on 5/9/2025 at GACH 2 because of [medical] insurance problems. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 7/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had intact cognitive ((mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity) with eating and required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) personal hygiene. Resident 1 was dependent (helper does all the effort) with toileting hygiene and shower/bathing. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/15/2025 at 2:54 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's electronic medical chart was reviewed. The DON stated the electronic medical chart did not indicate a notification to Medical Doctor 1 (MD 1, Resident 1's primary care physician).MD 1 that Resident 1 was not seen at his oncology appointment on 5/9/2025 with Oncologist 1. The DON also stated the electronic medical chart did not indicate a rescheduled or completed appointment with the Oncologist 1. The DON stated Resident 1 was not seen by the Oncologist 1 due to insurance issues and per facility protocol, MD 1 should have been notified by staff so that another appointment could be scheduled. During an interview on 10/15/2025 at 3:54 PM with MD 1, MD 1 stated Residents Affected - Few (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 555908 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 555908 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 11/25/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE South Pasadena Care Center 904 Mission St South Pasadena, CA 91030 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete he should have been notified by staff when Resident 1 was not seen on 5/9/2025 by Oncologist 1 so he could find another oncology specialist that worked with Resident 1's insurance. During an interview on 10/16/2025 at 12:17 PM with the DON, the DON stated the facility did not follow the policy to ensure Resident 1 was seen by Oncologist 1 as prescribed. The DON also stated MD 1 was not and should have been notified. The DON stated and appointment was not rescheduled and should have been. The DON stated this was an important appointment for this resident so if it was cancelled, it should have been endorsed to Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor for her to follow up. The DON stated that without the oncology appointment, we could not ensure Resident 1 received all necessary care for cancer. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Referral to Medical Specialist, dated 1/6/2025, the P&P indicated the purpose of the policy is to ensure timely, appropriate and coordinated referral of residents to medical specialist when indicated by clinical condition, physician recommendation, or resident/family request. The P&P also indicated:1. The facility will facilitate resident access to necessary medical specialist consultations in collaboration with the attending physician, interdisciplinary team, and/or resident's responsible party.2. Referrals shall be clinically justified, documented, and followed up in accordance with regulatory standards and facility procedures.3. The Social Services Designee or Unit nurse contacts the specialist office to schedule the appointment. Event ID: Facility ID: 555908 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 25, 2025 survey of SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER on November 25, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at SOUTH PASADENA CARE CENTER on November 25, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.