Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

KERN RIVER TRANSITIONAL CARECMS #5559121 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555912 05/16/2025 Kern River Transitional Care 5151 Knudsen Drive Bakersfield, CA 93308
F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: Residents Affected - Few 1. Ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was wearing non-skid socks (non-slip socks are designed with rubberized grips on the soles, offering the traction needed to walk safely. This feature is particularly vital for elderly residents or those with balance problems, significantly reducing the risk of falls and related injuries) according to the plan of care when Resident 1 was high risk for falls. 2. Follow their in-service on Falls to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) initially assessed one of three residents (Resident 1) who was found on the floor when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not wait for the RN to assess before transferring Resident 1 from the floor to the wheelchair and to the bed. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 1 falling and sustaining a left hip fracture (broken bone). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation (CCE), dated 3/29/25, the CCE indicated, Resident [1] had an unwitnessed fall in her room attempting to the restroom [sic] without assistance. Pain level was assessed. Resident c/o [complained of] pain on her left hip. Resident [1] was then helped into her wheelchair and subsequently into her bed. During a review of Resident 1's Fall Risk Observation/Assessment (FROA), dated 3/12/25, the FROA indicated, Score: 26 [score of 16-42 means high risk for falls]. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 3/13/25, the CP indicated, [Resident 1] is at risk for falls. Interventions: Provide proper well-maintained footwear as indicated (Non-Skid Socks, etc). During an interview on 5/16/25 at 9:08 a.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was not wearing non-skid socks when she fell. CNA 1 stated she removed Resident 1 ' s non-skid socks when she placed Resident 1 in bed prior to the fall incident. During an interview on 5/16/25 at 9:32 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated Resident 1 should be wearing non-skid socks at all times. During an interview on 5/17/25 at 10:22 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated when he went to assess Page 1 of 2 555912 555912 05/16/2025 Kern River Transitional Care 5151 Knudsen Drive Bakersfield, CA 93308
F 0684 Resident 1 after the fall incident, Resident 1 was not wearing non-skid socks. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Falls-Clinical Protocol dated March 2018, the P&P indicated, Based on preceding assessment, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent fals and to address the risks of clinically significant consequences of falling. Residents Affected - Few 2. During an interview on 5/16/25 at 9:08 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated LVN 1 called her when LVN 1 found Resident 1 on the floor by the door of the bathroom. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 complained of left hip pain. CNA 1 stated she asked LVN 1 to help her lift Resident 1 back to bed. CNA 1 stated LVN 1 lifted Resident 1 by her upper body and CNA 1 lifted Resident 1's legs to the wheelchair then to Resident 1 ' s bed. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 continued to complain of pain. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/25 at 9:30 a.m. in Resident 1's room, with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in bed with a bed alarm attached to the bed. Resident 1 stated she remembered she had a pain in her left hip when she fell. During an interview on 5/16/25 at 10:35 a.m. with RN Supervisor (RNS), RNS stated he was called to assess Resident 1 after the fall incident. RNS stated he went to see Resident 1 in less than five minutes. RNS stated, When I got there [Resident 1 ' s room], she [Resident 1] was already in bed. Resident [1] was holding her left hip complaining of pain. RNS stated he suspected hip fracture right away, so he sent Resident 1 to the acute care hospital. RNS stated LVN 1 did not wait for him to assess Resident 1 before transferring Resident 1 to the bed. During an interview on 5/17/25 at 10:22 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated he was aware RNS should initially assess Resident 1 prior to transferring Resident 1 after the fall incident. LVN 1 stated he did not wait for RNS prior to moving/transferring Resident 1. During a review of the facility's in-service on Falls dated 3/4/25, the in-service on Falls indicated, If a fall occurs: Supervisor [RN] to assess resident prior to moving or touching the resident. Residents must be assessed prior to lifting or transferring resident to ensure it is safe to do so. RN supervisor will delegate if the resident should be referred to 911 services. 555912 Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 16, 2025 survey of KERN RIVER TRANSITIONAL CARE?

This was a inspection survey of KERN RIVER TRANSITIONAL CARE on May 16, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at KERN RIVER TRANSITIONAL CARE on May 16, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.