Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

FOWLER CARE CENTERCMS #5559181 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

555918 06/07/2024 Fowler Care Center 8448 East Adams Avenue Fowler, CA 93625
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 5/15/24 at 7:40 PM and was found by the Sheriff's Department on 5/16/24 at 4 AM in the orchard a mile away from the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility without supervision for over eight hours which had the potential to cause injuries. Findings: During an observation on 7/7/24 at 2:35 PM Resident 1 was sitting in the lobby smiling and waving hello to visitors. Resident 1 had an approximately 1-millimeter dot size scabbed on the forehead and on the forearm. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-contains important information about a patient such as their personal details, the reason for admission and medical history), dated 6/10/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (TBI, serious injury to the brain that affects problems with how a person thinks, understands, moves, communicates, and acts), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 2/23/24, the CP indicated Resident 1 is an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness, Resident wanders aimlessly. The resident's safety will be maintained. The resident will not leave facility unattended. The CP dated 3/5/24 indicated Resident 1 has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to head injury (TBI). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 5/15/24, at 11:10 PM, the PN indicated Resident 1 .had not been seen in facility. All staff was searching the entire facility, rooms, restrooms, outside perimeter, parking lot, and nearby streets. Resident was unable to be located . [local police department] were notified. During a review of the facility document titled Event 5-Day Follow Up (FU), dated 5/20/24, the FU indicated, On 5/15/24, at 7:40 PM PST [Pacific Standard Time] staff notified charge nurse that resident had not been seen in facility. Facility staff started searching entire facility, rooms, restrooms, outside perimeter, parking lot and nearby streets. Resident was unable to be located. [Local law enforcement and many others] went on search for missing resident. Resident was found by [local law Page 1 of 4 555918 555918 06/07/2024 Fowler Care Center 8448 East Adams Avenue Fowler, CA 93625
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few enforcement] unit at 4 AM PST on 5/16/24. Resident was found hiding in fields about 1 mile from facility. Around the time resident is estimated to leave the facility [a] family of another resident was leaving the facility. Resident may have slipped out with the group. During an observation of the facility on 6/7/24, at 1:59 PM, an approximately 7-foot-tall metal fence was noted in front of the facility. The entry from the parking area was locked gate with signs indicating FOR OUR RESIDENT'S SAFETY ALWAYS CLOSE AND LOCK THIS GATE and PLEASE SHUT GATE visible from the entry (parking lot) side. A doorbell was present, and once rung, a staff person came and opened gate with a metal key inserted into the gate's doorknob. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/7/24, at 2:11 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the entire perimeter of the facility was observed. The 7-foot-tall metal fence was noted surrounding the entire facility. The IP stated there were a total of four gates to the facility, but the staff and visitors enter and leave the facility through the main gate, which was always kept locked with a key. The other three gates were noted to be tightly closed with a padlock and/or chain. There were no visible means for a resident to climb over, or through, the fence. The same signs were noted at the exit (facility side) side of main gate indicating, FOR OUR RESIDENT'S SAFETY ALWAYS CLOSE AND LOCK THIS GATE and PLEASE SHUT GATE. The IP verified the findings and stated, There's no way [Resident 1] could have gotten over this fence. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 6/7/24, at 2:40 PM, the DON stated, We are a locked facility. The fence surrounds the entire building, and the only way in or out is through the locked gate. The DON stated Resident 1 was ambulatory. The DON stated before the incident Resident 1 wanted to go to his daughter's house approximately 25 miles from the facility. The DON stated Resident 1 was observed standing near the entry gate watching visitors and staff in and out the facility. The DON stated only the facility staff had a key to the gate. The DON stated we searched for Resident 1 and looked for chairs, barrels against the fence, any methods for him to climb over the fence, and we did not find anything. The DON stated we determined Resident 1 was not in the facility and notified the Sheriff's department. The DON stated Resident 1 was found by Sheriff's department hiding in an orchard a mile from the facility. The DON stated Resident 1 had minor scratches and have healed in a week. The DON stated Resident 1 had cognitive issues and was not able to tell us how he got out. The DON stated we had some visitors leave the facility on 5/15/24 at about 7:40 PM he must have exited the facility when the visitors left. The DON stated facility staff had to be there to unlock the gate for the visitors to exit the facility. The DON stated more likely Resident 1 exited the facility with the visitors without facility staff noticing. During a review of the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Elopements and Wandering Residents, dated 10/24, the P&P indicated, in part, Policy: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization. and/or any necessary supervision to do so. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms to help avoid elopements. Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents or elopements. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a high risk for elopement when Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 5/15/24 at 7:40 PM and was found by the Sheriff's Department on 5/16/24 at 4 AM in the orchard a mile away from the facility. 555918 Page 2 of 4 555918 06/07/2024 Fowler Care Center 8448 East Adams Avenue Fowler, CA 93625
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility without supervision for over eight hours which had the potential to cause injuries. Findings: During an observation on 7/7/24 at 2:35 PM Resident 1 was sitting in the lobby smiling and waving hello to visitors. Resident 1 had an approximately 1-millimeter dot size scabbed on the forehead and on the forearm. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-contains important information about a patient such as their personal details, the reason for admission and medical history), dated 6/10/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (TBI, serious injury to the brain that affects problems with how a person thinks, understands, moves, communicates, and acts), and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 2/23/24, the CP indicated Resident 1 is an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness, Resident wanders aimlessly. The resident's safety will be maintained. The resident will not leave facility unattended. The CP dated 3/5/24 indicated Resident 1 has impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to head injury (TBI). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 5/15/24, at 11:10 PM, the PN indicated Resident 1 .had not been seen in facility. All staff was searching the entire facility, rooms, restrooms, outside perimeter, parking lot, and nearby streets. Resident was unable to be located . [local police department] were notified. During a review of the facility document titled Event 5-Day Follow Up (FU), dated 5/20/24, the FU indicated, On 5/15/24, at 7:40 PM PST [Pacific Standard Time] staff notified charge nurse that resident had not been seen in facility. Facility staff started searching entire facility, rooms, restrooms, outside perimeter, parking lot and nearby streets. Resident was unable to be located. [Local law enforcement and many others] went on search for missing resident. Resident was found by [local law enforcement] unit at 4 AM PST on 5/16/24. Resident was found hiding in fields about 1 mile from facility. Around the time resident is estimated to leave the facility [a] family of another resident was leaving the facility. Resident may have slipped out with the group. During an observation of the facility on 6/7/24, at 1:59 PM, an approximately 7-foot-tall metal fence was noted in front of the facility. The entry from the parking area was locked gate with signs indicating FOR OUR RESIDENT'S SAFETY ALWAYS CLOSE AND LOCK THIS GATE and PLEASE SHUT GATE visible from the entry (parking lot) side. A doorbell was present, and once rung, a staff person came and opened gate with a metal key inserted into the gate's doorknob. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/7/24, at 2:11 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the entire perimeter of the facility was observed. The 7-foot-tall metal fence was noted surrounding the entire facility. The IP stated there were a total of four gates to the facility, but the staff and visitors enter and leave the facility through the main gate, which was always kept locked with a key. The other three gates were noted to be tightly closed with a padlock and/or chain. There were no visible means for a resident to climb over, or through, the fence. The same signs were noted at the exit (facility side) side of main gate indicating, FOR OUR RESIDENT'S SAFETY ALWAYS 555918 Page 3 of 4 555918 06/07/2024 Fowler Care Center 8448 East Adams Avenue Fowler, CA 93625
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few CLOSE AND LOCK THIS GATE and PLEASE SHUT GATE. The IP verified the findings and stated, There's no way [Resident 1] could have gotten over this fence. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 6/7/24, at 2:40 PM, the DON stated, We are a locked facility. The fence surrounds the entire building, and the only way in or out is through the locked gate. The DON stated Resident 1 was ambulatory. The DON stated before the incident Resident 1 wanted to go to his daughter's house approximately 25 miles from the facility. The DON stated Resident 1 was observed standing near the entry gate watching visitors and staff in and out the facility. The DON stated only the facility staff had a key to the gate. The DON stated we searched for Resident 1 and looked for chairs, barrels against the fence, any methods for him to climb over the fence, and we did not find anything. The DON stated we determined Resident 1 was not in the facility and notified the Sheriff's department. The DON stated Resident 1 was found by Sheriff's department hiding in an orchard a mile from the facility. The DON stated Resident 1 had minor scratches and have healed in a week. The DON stated Resident 1 had cognitive issues and was not able to tell us how he got out. The DON stated we had some visitors leave the facility on 5/15/24 at about 7:40 PM he must have exited the facility when the visitors left. The DON stated facility staff had to be there to unlock the gate for the visitors to exit the facility. The DON stated more likely Resident 1 exited the facility with the visitors without facility staff noticing. During a review of the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Elopements and Wandering Residents, dated 10/24, the P&P indicated, in part, Policy: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization. and/or any necessary supervision to do so. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The facility is equipped with door locks/alarms to help avoid elopements. Adequate supervision will be provided to help prevent accidents or elopements. 555918 Page 4 of 4

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 7, 2024 survey of FOWLER CARE CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of FOWLER CARE CENTER on June 7, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at FOWLER CARE CENTER on June 7, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.