F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the
resident's status for 3 (Resident #7, #8, and #9) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment,
in that:
Residents Affected - Some
-The facility failed to ensure Residents #7's, #8's, and #9's MDS accurately reflected the residents' history
of falls.
This deficient practice could affect residents at the facility who had been assessed for risk of falls and could
contribute to inadequate care.
Findings included:
Resident #7:
Record review of Resident #7's admission Record dated 03/19/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female
was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia
(impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and
unsteadiness on feet.
Record review of Resident #7's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 06 indicating that the resident had
severe cognitive impairment. Section I - Active Diagnoses revealed resident diagnosed with unsteadiness
on feet. Section J - Health Conditions under fall history revealed that resident had not had any falls since
admission or re-entry to the facility.
Review of Resident #7's fall history revealed that Resident #7 had a fall on 01/27/2025.
Record review of Resident #7's Care Plan dated 02/27/2025, reads in part on 1/27/25: Resident had an
actual fall with injury related to dementia with behaviors, poor safety awareness, impulsive behaviors.
Another part of the plan revealed that resident was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems,
dementia, history of falls, self-transferring, high risk medications, recurrent falls, and poor safety awareness.
Resident #8:
Record review of Resident #8's admission Record dated 03/19/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with
an admission date of 09/06/2023. Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or
make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), unsteadiness on feet, and
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
675025
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675025
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/13/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
White Acres Wellness & Rehabilitation
7304 Good Samaritan Court
El Paso, TX 79912
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
history of falling.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 04 indicating that the
resident had severe cognitive impairment. Section I - Active Diagnoses revealed resident diagnosed with
unsteadiness on feet. Section J - Health Conditions under fall history revealed that resident had not had any
falls since admission or re-entry to the facility.
Residents Affected - Some
Review of Resident #8's fall history revealed that Resident #7 had a fall on 01/12/2025.
Record review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 02/27/2025, reads in part resident was found on the floor
mat with no injury related to confusion and stated she was looking for her children. Another care area reads
resident was at risk for falls related to weakness, anxiety, poor safety awareness, prefers to lie at the edge
of the bed, confusion, nightmares, and history of recurring falls.
Resident #9:
Record review of Resident #9's admission Record dated 03/19/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male with
admission date of 11/30/2018. Diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make
decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and unsteadiness on feet.
Record review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 12 indicating that the
resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section I - Active Diagnoses revealed resident diagnosed with
unsteadiness on feet. Section J - Health Conditions under fall history revealed that resident had not had any
falls since admission or re-entry to the facility.
Review of Resident #9's fall history revealed that Resident #7 had a fall on 01/1/2025.
Record review of Resident #9's Care Plan dated 02/27/2025, reads in part resident was at risk for falls
related to CVA (cerebrovascular accident) weakness, left hemiparesis, history of falls, attempts to get out of
bed. Another care area reads on 1/1/25 resident had an actual fall with minor injury of
discoloration/abrasion/bruise to back of right hand.
During an interview on 02/28/2025 at 1:04 p.m., the MDS Coordinator said an MDS covers everything
about a resident's health conditions. The MDS Coordinator said it was very important for the MDS to be
accurate as it was used to care plan. The MDS Coordinator said she was responsible to ensure that MDS
was accurate and up to date. The MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident #7's, #8's, and #9's MDS's and said
that the falls should have been captured on the assessments. The MDS Coordinator said the facility had
undergone a change in ownership back in November 2024 and believes that she may not have had all the
correct information when completing the MDS's for the residents. The MDS Coordinator said she should
have followed up to ensure she had all the information she needed to complete the MDS .
During an interview on 02/28/2025 at 3:15 p.m., the DON said the purpose of the MDS was assess resident
in all care areas. The DON said it was very important for the MDS to be accurate as it may impact care
planning for a resident. The DON said the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the MDS completion and
accuracy. The DON said the MDS was done annually, quarterly, and when there was any change in
condition including falls. The DON said the risk of falls not being captured accurately on the MDS may
impact the interventions that were in place for the residents .
Review of facility provided Fall Evaluation and Prevention policy dated 08/2020, reads in part The
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675025
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675025
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/13/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
White Acres Wellness & Rehabilitation
7304 Good Samaritan Court
El Paso, TX 79912
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
facility will evaluate residents for their fall risk and develop interventions for prevention.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of RAI Version 3.0 manual dated October of 2019, reads in part regarding Section J fall
assessment, the review period is from the day after the ARD of the last MDS assessment to the ARD of the
current assessment; Review all available sources for any fall since the last assessment, no matter whether
it occurred while out in the community, in an acute hospital, or in the nursing home. Include medical records
generated in any health care setting since last assessment. All relevant records received from acute and
post-acute facilities where the resident was admitted during the look-back period should be reviewed for
evidence of one or more falls; Review nursing home incident reports and medical record (physician,
nursing, therapy, and nursing assistant notes) for falls and level of injury; Ask the resident, staff, and family
about falls during the look-back period. Resident and family reports of falls should be captured here,
whether or not these incidents are documented in the medical record; Review any follow-up medical
information received pertaining to the fall, even if this information is received after the ARD (e.g.,
emergency room x-ray, MRI, CT scan results), and ensure that this information is used to code the
assessment .
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675025
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3