Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Cedar Hill Healthcare CenterCMS #6750321 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0641 Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the each resident's status for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #6) reviewed for accuracy of assessment . Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #6's MDS assessment correctly noted their behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: 1. A record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 07/06/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's had diagnoses which included Chronic Diastolic Congestive heart failure (a condition where the lower left chamber of the heart is not able to fill properly with blood during the diastolic phase, reducing the amount of blood pumped out to the body), Schizophrenia (delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that don't exist), unusual physical behavior, and disorganized thinking and speech and Type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). Resident #2 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. A record review of Resident #2's admisson MDS , section E, dated 06/26/23, revealed no behaviors were exhibited in the 7-day look-back period. No behavior of rejection of care had occurred during that time. A record review of Resident #2 care plan, last revised on 06/20/23, revealed he required secure unit placement related to being an elopement risk. Resident #2 had poor impulse control, on 06/19/23. Resident #2 made a sexual comment to the aide and yelled loudly. On 06/20/23 Resident #2 refused incontinent care. The interventions included educating the resident regarding the outcome of not complying. Give Resident #2 a clear explanation of care activities and encourage Resident #2 to make his own choices and remain independent during care. 2. A record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 07/10/23, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life), Delusional disorder, and Major depressive disorder . Resident #2 was located on the facility's secure unit. A record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed section E, for behaviors, (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675032 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675032 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 07/10/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Cedar Hill Healthcare Center 230 S Clark Rd Cedar Hill, TX 75104 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641 reflected no delusions and no behaviors were documented. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm A record review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 03/25/22, revealed the resident was a wander and elopement risk. No other behaviors were noted on the care plan. Residents Affected - Few A record review of Resident#6's progress notes from 05/26/23 to 06/02/23 reflected the following: 06/02/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D 06/01/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D 05/31/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D 05/30/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D 05/29/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D An interview with the SW on 07/10/23 at 11:09 AM revealed she completed section E of the residents MDS. She completed the section based on the 7-day look-back period for the residents. She would review the records of the residents before completing the section. She was not aware of Resident #2 or Resident #6 displaying behaviors within the look-back period . The SW revealed she had not documented behaviors for each resident , though records reflected that Resident #2 and Resident #6 had behaviors. The SW stated she reviewed the records and had not seen any documentation of behaviors for each of the residents. An interview with the ADM on 07/10/23 at 12:52 PM revealed Resident #2's care plan reflected there had been behaviors within the look-back period. She had no knowledge of why the SW had not documented correctly on the MDS. Resident #6 had behaviors, and the SW should have completed the MDS to reflect those behaviors. The ADM stated the facility did not have a policy regarding MDS accuracy, however, the facility followed the RAI manual for completing MDS assessments. An interview on 07/10/23 at 2:34 PM with Nurse D, revealed Resident #6 had behaviors non-stop. The nurse stated Resident #6's behaviors included wandering into other residents' rooms. Resident #6's behaviors also included exit-seeking throughout the secure unit. Nurse D stated Resident #6 would often be redirected after attempting to push other residents that were in the wheelchair, to be helpful . Record review of the CMS RAI manual, dated 10/19, reflected Steps for Assessment 1. Review the resident's medical record for the 7-day look-back period. 2. Interview staff members and others who have had the opportunity to observe the resident in a variety of situations during the 7-day look-back period. 3. Observe the resident during conversations and the structured interviews in other assessment sections and listen for statements indicating an experience of hallucinations, or the expression of false beliefs (delusions). FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675032 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0641GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F641 - Accuracy of Assessments

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 10, 2023 survey of Cedar Hill Healthcare Center?

This was a inspection survey of Cedar Hill Healthcare Center on July 10, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Cedar Hill Healthcare Center on July 10, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.