F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the each
resident's status for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #6) reviewed for accuracy of assessment .
Residents Affected - Few
The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #6's MDS assessment correctly noted their
behaviors.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.
Findings include:
1. A record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 07/06/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was
admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's had diagnoses which included Chronic Diastolic
Congestive heart failure (a condition where the lower left chamber of the heart is not able to fill properly
with blood during the diastolic phase, reducing the amount of blood pumped out to the body),
Schizophrenia (delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that don't exist), unusual
physical behavior, and disorganized thinking and speech and Type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens
because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). Resident #2 was discharged
to the hospital on [DATE].
A record review of Resident #2's admisson MDS , section E, dated 06/26/23, revealed no behaviors were
exhibited in the 7-day look-back period. No behavior of rejection of care had occurred during that time.
A record review of Resident #2 care plan, last revised on 06/20/23, revealed he required secure unit
placement related to being an elopement risk. Resident #2 had poor impulse control, on 06/19/23. Resident
#2 made a sexual comment to the aide and yelled loudly. On 06/20/23 Resident #2 refused incontinent
care. The interventions included educating the resident regarding the outcome of not complying. Give
Resident #2 a clear explanation of care activities and encourage Resident #2 to make his own choices and
remain independent during care.
2. A record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 07/10/23, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was
admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting
memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with your daily life), Delusional disorder,
and Major depressive disorder . Resident #2 was located on the facility's secure unit.
A record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed section E, for behaviors,
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675032
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675032
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/10/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cedar Hill Healthcare Center
230 S Clark Rd
Cedar Hill, TX 75104
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
reflected no delusions and no behaviors were documented.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
A record review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 03/25/22, revealed the resident was a wander and
elopement risk. No other behaviors were noted on the care plan.
Residents Affected - Few
A record review of Resident#6's progress notes from 05/26/23 to 06/02/23 reflected the following:
06/02/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D
06/01/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D
05/31/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D
05/30/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D
05/29/23- Was a behavior observed? Yes, completed by Nurse D
An interview with the SW on 07/10/23 at 11:09 AM revealed she completed section E of the residents MDS.
She completed the section based on the 7-day look-back period for the residents. She would review the
records of the residents before completing the section. She was not aware of Resident #2 or Resident #6
displaying behaviors within the look-back period . The SW revealed she had not documented behaviors for
each resident , though records reflected that Resident #2 and Resident #6 had behaviors. The SW stated
she reviewed the records and had not seen any documentation of behaviors for each of the residents.
An interview with the ADM on 07/10/23 at 12:52 PM revealed Resident #2's care plan reflected there had
been behaviors within the look-back period. She had no knowledge of why the SW had not documented
correctly on the MDS. Resident #6 had behaviors, and the SW should have completed the MDS to reflect
those behaviors. The ADM stated the facility did not have a policy regarding MDS accuracy, however, the
facility followed the RAI manual for completing MDS assessments.
An interview on 07/10/23 at 2:34 PM with Nurse D, revealed Resident #6 had behaviors non-stop. The
nurse stated Resident #6's behaviors included wandering into other residents' rooms. Resident #6's
behaviors also included exit-seeking throughout the secure unit. Nurse D stated Resident #6 would often be
redirected after attempting to push other residents that were in the wheelchair, to be helpful .
Record review of the CMS RAI manual, dated 10/19, reflected Steps for Assessment 1. Review the
resident's medical record for the 7-day look-back period. 2. Interview staff members and others who have
had the opportunity to observe the resident in a variety of situations during the 7-day look-back period. 3.
Observe the resident during conversations and the structured interviews in other assessment sections and
listen for statements indicating an experience of hallucinations, or the expression of false beliefs
(delusions).
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675032
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2