Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCCMS #6750341 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to provide a 30-day written notice of discharge as well as discharge planning for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for discharge planning. * The failure to provide a 30-day written discharge notice and discharge planning could result in residents experiencing psychosocial harm due to inappropriate discharges and placed residents at risk of being discharged without alternate placement and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and denying them their rights in the appeal process. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 5/24/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of type 2 Diabetes (when the body can't use insulin properly, causing sugar to build up in the blood), cognitive communication deficit (trouble thinking, understanding, or expressing themselves due to problems with the brain), and atherosclerotic heart disease (when the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed or blocked by a buildup of plaque). Record review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated a discharge assessment of return not anticipated. The type of discharge indicated on the report specified as unplanned with a discharge date of 4/16/25. The discharge status indicated to home/community. The behavioral section indicated no physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed to others. The behavioral section indicated no other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others. Record review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record on 05/24/25 did not reveal a 30-day discharge notice. Record review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record did not reveal discharge planning. Record review of Resident #1's Recapitulation of Stay Resident Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated resident was discharged on 4/16/25. The discharge summary revealed Resident was in the skilled nursing facility for long term care and was discharged to home with family. Record review of Resident #1's Care plan dated 5/24/25 reflected a documented status of being a sex offender. Interventions included notifying physician/family/police/probation officer of any known inappropriate behavior and psych services as needed. Further interventions revealed the following for sexually inappropriate behaviors: evaluate the resident's ability to understand behavior and the (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 675034 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675034 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 05/24/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC 901 Pennsylvania Ave Fort Worth, TX 76104 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm consequences of that behavior, explain to the resident the acceptable expressions of sexuality based on the cognitive evaluation, listen/talk to the resident - see if they will tell you why they do the behavior, Psychiatric Services consult as needed, reinforce with staff that clear, firm limits are healthy and required when resident makes inappropriate gestures or statements, and report incidents of target behavior to charge nurse. Residents Affected - Few Record review of Resident #1's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 5/24/25 did not indicate a reason for discharge. Record review of Incidents by Incident Type log with a date range of 02/23/2025 - 05/23/2025, dated 05/23/2025 revealed no incidents that involved Resident #1. Interview with Administrator on 5/24/25 at 12 p.m. revealed she discharged Resident #1 because he was a registered sex offender and was getting too friendly in the dining room. The Administrator reported the friendliness was not directed toward any certain resident. She reported she never received any reports by other residents regarding Resident #1 being inappropriate toward other residents. When asked to explain what too friendly meant, the Administrator stated Resident #1 would say he wanted a girlfriend and he wanted to sit by females in the dining room. The Administrator stated Resident #1 was not given a 30-day notice. The Administrator stated she discharged planned the day prior with the social worker and family member over the phone. An attempt to interview the Social Worker was made on 5/24/25 at 10:23 a.m. and was unsuccessful. Interview with Director of Nursing on 5/24/25 at 11:40 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was discharged due to making comments about wanting a girlfriend and because of his history of being a sex offender. When asked if there was discharge planning completed, the Director of Nursing stated the discharge was discussed with the social worker a couple of days prior to the discharge date between the Administrator and Social Worker. She spoke to the family member the day he was discharged and shared their concerns about Resident #1 and that another facility had accepted Resident #1. The Director of Nursing stated the family member told her that facility was too far and agreed to take him home. The Director of Nursing stated a 30-day notice was not provided to Resident #1 or his family member. Interview with Resident #1's family member on 5/24/25 at 10:34 a.m. revealed he was called on 4/16/25 by the facility and was told to come pick up Resident #1 or the cops would be called to remove him. The family member stated he was told the reason for discharge was inappropriate behavior but was not told what the behavior was. The family member stated that was the only time he spoke to anyone at the facility. The family member stated the facility offered another facility, but it was too far. He stated he brought Resident #1 home and then Resident #1 went to another facility. Interview with Weekend Supervisor on 5/24/25 at 11:29 a.m. revealed she was not aware of why Resident #1 was discharged . She reported that she completed Resident #1's Recapitulation of Stay. She stated you need to know why the resident went home when completing the form; she stated she documented that why the resident was discharged on the form. The Weekend Supervisor stated she never saw Resident #1 being inappropriate toward other residents. Interview with RN A on 5/24/25 at 10:39 a.m. revealed she did not know why Resident #1 was discharged . She reported she never had concerns about his behavior. She stated Resident #1 usually stayed to himself in his room. (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675034 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675034 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 05/24/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC 901 Pennsylvania Ave Fort Worth, TX 76104 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0627 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Interview with RN B on 5/24/25 at 11:18 a.m. revealed she did not know why Resident #1 was discharged . She reported she was not aware of any inappropriate behaviors by Resident #1. Interview with CNA A on 5/24/25 at 10:54 a.m. revealed she did not know why Resident #1 was discharged . She stated Resident #1 stayed mostly in his room and never saw him act inappropriately toward other residents. CNA A stated Resident #1 would sit at a table with all men at lunch. Interview with CNA B on 5/24/25 at 11:08 a.m. revealed she did not know why Resident #1 was discharged . She reported she never saw him being too friendly with other residents. She stated Resident #1 barely spoke. She stated she never saw him hanging out with other residents. Interview with Dietary Aide A on 5/24/25 at 10:59 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was a nice man and never saw him doing anything wrong to other residents. Interview with Dietary Aide B on 5/24/25 at 11:02 a.m. revealed he never saw Resident #1 being inappropriate toward other residents. Interview with Human Resources on 5/24/25 at 10:24 a.m. revealed she was familiar with Resident #1 and was not aware of any incidents of him being inappropriate toward other residents. She reported she was not aware of the reason for his discharge. Interview with 14 Residents selected for sample on 5/24/25 between 8:15 a.m. and 9:23 a.m. revealed no concerns for safety or inappropriate behaviors from other residents. Record review of the facility transfer and discharge policy on 5/24/25 was dated and revised on 6/2020. The policy stated To ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing provider. The Facility may transfer or discharge a resident for the following reasons. A. The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility, B. The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so that the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility, C. The safety of individual in the facility is endangered by the resident's presence, D. The health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered by the resident's presence, E. The resident has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for (or to have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility. For a resident who becomes eligible for Medicaid after admission to a facility, the facility may charge a resident only allowable charges under Medicaid, or F. The facility ceases to operate. IV. Facility staff will provide the resident with reasonable advance notice of the transfer or discharge before it occurs. Unless exigent circumstances exist, the notice should be provided 30 days prior to the proposed date of transfer/discharge. Situations that may prevent 30 days' notice include: A. The resident poses a threat to the health or safety of other individuals at the facility, B. The resident's health improves sufficiently to allow for more immediate transfer/discharge, C. The resident is experiencing urgent medical needs, or D. The resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days. III. Prior to transfer/discharge, Social Services Staff or designee will provide the resident or responsible party with reasonable notice that the resident is going to be transferred or discharged . FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675034 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0627GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F627 - Transfer and discharge-

    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 24, 2025 survey of Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC?

This was a inspection survey of Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC on May 24, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC on May 24, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transf..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.