F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained
as free of accident hazards as was possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for
two (Residents #4 and #10) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a fall mat in place at the bedside as indicated in her care plan.
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #10 when he fell from his wheelchair in his
room.
This failure could place residents at risk of falls with injury and hospitalization.
The findings were:
1.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 9/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who originally
admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, in part, dementia,
pain, need for assistance with personal care, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (an ongoing lung
condition caused by damage to the lungs).
Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 3 out of
15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. She required assistance from staff with ADL care. She had
1 fall since admission or reentry or the prior assessment with no injury.
Record review of Resident #4's care plan revised on 8/27/24 revealed she was at risk for falls and injuries
as evidenced by an actual fall on 2/25/24 and 8/26/24. Interventions included to have a fall mat at the
bedside (date initiated 2/26/24).
In an observation on 9/15/24 at 1:24 p.m. revealed Resident #4 was asleep in bed on an air mattress. There
were no fall mats on either side of the bed.
In an observation on 9/15/24 at 4:46 p.m. of Resident #4 revealed she was in bed. There were no fall mats
at the bedside.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 4:48 p.m. LVN S said Resident #4 fell around one month ago. She said the
facility put the fall mat in place after she fell. She said she had a fall mat, but it was not there anymore. She
said she would need to check the orders to verify but the fall mat should be in
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
675078
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675078
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/15/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Woodway Nursing & Rehab
2808 Stoneybrook Drive
Houston, TX 77063
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
place, and she was unsure what happened. She said Resident #4 complained about the fall mat and did
not want it there because the mat interfered with the tray. She said all staff should check if it was in place.
She said she was unsure if there was a risk to the resident if the mat was not in place.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 4:53 p.m. CNA Y said Resident #4 did not need a fall mat because she did not
move. She said no one told her she needed a fall mat.
In an observation on 9/15/24 at 4:57 p.m. of Resident #4's room revealed there was a fall mat standing up
against the other bed in the room.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 4:58 p.m. the DON said Resident #4 should have a fall mat to the right side of
the bed and it was normally down. She said the facility put the fall mat in place because the resident had a
fall and liked to lean to the side on her air mattress. She said the direction to put a fall mat down was
located on the [NAME]. She said she would start an in-service on reviewing the [NAME].
In an observation on 9/15/24 at 5:02 p.m. the DON entered Resident #4's room and put her fall mat in
place. The DON explained to the resident that the fall mat needed to be in place.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 5:05 p.m. the DON said the fall mat was an intervention. She said the mat
would not prevent a fall but could prevent injury.
2. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 9/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who
readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central
nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), epilepsy (seizures), blindness right eye
category 5, blindness left eye category 5, chronic kidney disease, dementia, restlessness and agitation,
weakness, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations.
Record review of Resident #10's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 5/15/23 revealed he was alert or comatose, he
had no falls in past 3 months of eval, he was chair bound, required restraints and assistance with
elimination, his vision was poor, he had a balance problem while standing, decreased muscular
coordination, and required use of assistive device. There was no noted drop in systolic blood pressure
between lying and standing, no medication taken currently or within the last 7 days of assessment, no
change in medication or dosage in past 5 days, and no predisposing disease. His fall risk was 7 out of 35.
Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 3 out
of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. He required assistance from staff with ADL care. He had
no falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment.
Record review of Resident #10's Un-witnessed Fall incident report dated 9/7/24 at 3:28 p.m. written by LVN
B read in part, .Nurse heard yelling coming from the hall went to make rounds and found patient on the
floor he hit his head . Resident's vitals were taken, nurse cleaned his head with normal saline . Nurse was
calling 911 because the resident hit his head .Injury: abrasion at top of scalp .
Record review of Resident #10's care plan revised on 9/9/24 revealed he was at risk for falls and injuries as
evidenced by blindness, unsteady gait, and decreased mobility. He had an actual fall on 9/7/24 (date
initiated 6/10/23, revised on 9/9/24). Interventions were to anticipate needs - provide
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675078
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675078
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/15/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Woodway Nursing & Rehab
2808 Stoneybrook Drive
Houston, TX 77063
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
prompt assistance and assist resident in bed after being up (date initiated 6/10/23 and revised on 9/9/24).
Ensure call light was in reach - answer promptly (date initiated 6/10/23). Resident #10 was at risk for injury
from increased tremors, involuntary muscle movements, and decline in ADLs (initiated 3/22/24).
Interventions were to observe for increased tremors, unsteady gait, etc. - report to the MD. (initiated
3/22/24).
Residents Affected - Few
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 10:42 a.m. CNA D said if Resident #10 was in the wheelchair she had to
watch him because he leaned and could slide. She said he did not get out of bed much, but his family
member wanted him up for 30 minutes and then back to bed.
In a telephone interview on 9/15/24 at 1:02 p.m. Resident #10's family member said on 9/7/24 she reviewed
the camera located in the resident's room and saw the facility staff place the resident, who had advanced
dementia, in his wheelchair at 12:15 p.m. She said no one checked on him afterward and he was left
unattended until he fell (at 3:21 p.m. per the video footage).
In an observation on 9/15/24 at 1:35 p.m. of video footage dated 9/7/24 at 3:21 p.m. revealed Resident #10
was in his room sitting in his wheelchair on top of a yellow pillow. He was leaning forward with his head
down. He tapped his foot slightly on the floor and then immediately toppled forward on the floor headfirst.
After falling to the floor, the wheelchair rolled backwards. No one else was observed in the room and a call
light could not be seen in reach.
In an attempted interview on 9/15/24 at 1:09 p.m. with CNA E who was assigned to Resident #10 on 9/7/24
on the 2 p.m. - 10 p.m. shift was unsuccessful.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 2:32 p.m. CNA Y said she was new to the facility and worked as needed. She
said she worked 6 a.m. - 2 p.m. on 6/7/24, the day of the incident. She said the Medication Aide (name
unknown) told her to get Resident #10 up in the wheelchair per family request. She said she got him up
after lunch, around 1:00 p.m., cleaned him up, and sat him directly in front of the camera. She said that was
her first time working with him by herself and never saw him in a wheelchair before. She said she
understood residents could sit in the wheelchair for a maximum of 2 hours. She said there were no signs in
the room that indicated he was a fall risk, and he did not have a fall risk band on his arm. She said she
walked up and down the hall and conducted rounds approximately every 30 minutes and saw him before
the end of her shift at 2:00 p.m. She said he was still sitting comfortably in the chair. She said things can
happen after a round and did not know about the fall until later.
In a telephone interview on 9/15/24 at 2:50 p.m. LVN B said she and CNA Y sat Resident #10 up in a
wheelchair right after lunch around 12:00 p.m. She said he could normally sit up for an hour or two, but she
told CNA Y to only keep the resident up for 30 minutes and put him back to bed per family request. She said
around 2:15 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. she was sitting at the nursing station and heard screaming. She said she
made a round and found the resident on the floor. She said Resident #10 should be a fall risk while sitting in
the wheelchair because an aide told her days after the incident that he could tilt over and fall. She said that
was the first time she saw the resident in the chair and never saw him tilt previously. She said she called
911 because he was bleeding from the forehead but there were no negative findings from the hospital tests.
She said if the resident was in the wheelchair, it should be locked at all times to keep him safe and secure.
She said he was unable to self-propel. She said nursing staff round every 2 hours.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 3:26 pm CNA Y said she did not hear the staff say to put Resident #10
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675078
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675078
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/15/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Woodway Nursing & Rehab
2808 Stoneybrook Drive
Houston, TX 77063
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
back to bed after 30 minutes.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 3:38 p.m. the DON said Resident #10 was sent to the hospital after the fall but
returned that night and was fine. She said his family member called the facility a few days later and was
upset because the resident was up in the wheelchair for 3 hours, which the DON said was not an
unreasonable amount of time. She said the resident was previously not known to fall and was at moderate
risk of falls. She said she did question why he was left in the room. She said it was best practice to lock the
wheelchair while he was in it for safety reasons because it could move. She said he was unable to move the
wheelchair on his own. She said she did not think it would have made a difference, regarding his fall, if the
wheelchair was locked or unlocked.
Residents Affected - Few
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 3:57 p.m. the Administrator said she was notified of Resident #10's fall. She
said when residents were up, they have a right to fall, and could not be restrained or tied to a chair. She
said residents could fall even if they sat in front of the nursing station. She said the facility could not sit with
Resident #10 for 24 hours and said 2-3 hours was not an unreasonable time to be in a chair. She said
family requests could be honored but it would need to be care planned. She said the family member's
request of the resident being up for 30 minutes was not care planned and was unreasonable for the facility.
She said the resident's family member changed her mind weekly on the resident being up. She said
wheelchairs should not be locked because it could be considered a restraint and safety risk. She said he
was a fall risk because he was blind and that was the only fall he had.
In a telephone interview on 9/15/24 at 4:21 p.m. CNA D said around 2 weeks ago Resident #10's family
member requested that the resident start to get up in the wheelchair for lunch. She said while the resident
was in the chair, she saw him lean to the side. She said the resident was contracted and he would lean over
easily. She said she would tell him to sit back up and he sat back up. She said she would stay by him, not
leave his side, and push the wheelchair all the way to the table so he would not tip over. She said someone
would need to watch him if he was up in the wheelchair. She said she did not tell anyone because he was
not tipping over and it was not bad, just a little slouch. She said she would report it if he was falling over in
his chair. She said during her shift, nursing staff never left him in the wheelchair by himself. She said if the
resident was left alone in the wheelchair, she could redirect him to sit back up during rounds. She said she
would lock the wheelchair if he was sitting in it and pull him all the way up to the table so he would not fall.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 4:34 p.m. Administrator said no one told her Resident #10 was leaning in his
wheelchair.
In an interview on 9/15/24 at 5:07 p.m. the DON said she never saw Resident #10 up in the wheelchair. She
said he may not be ready to be in the room but maybe at the nursing station or in activities. She said when
he was up in the chair staff should anticipate his needs. She said she would want staff to report any leaning
in the wheelchair to better anticipate his needs, update the care plan and [NAME], and individualize his
care.
Record review of the facility's Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy dated 2018 read in part, .Based on
previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific
risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling .
2. Resident conditions that may contribute to the risk of falls include . c. delirium and other cognitive
impairment, i. functional impairments; j. visual deficits . Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls
and Fall Risk 1. The staff, with the input of the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675078
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675078
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/15/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Woodway Nursing & Rehab
2808 Stoneybrook Drive
Houston, TX 77063
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk
factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls.
Record review of the facility's Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy dated 2018 read in part,
.A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet
the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident
Record review of the facility's Wheelchair policy dated 3/4/2020 read in part, .it is the policy of this center to
utilize wheelchairs for residents and to promote safety. Procedure . 1. Apply brakes to lock wheels of
wheelchair for transfer; for resident with ability to propel wheelchair but lack intact cognition to unlock do not
lock wheels to avoid restraining mobility .10. Permit the resident to remain in the wheelchair according to
the physician's order or as tolerated .14. Leave resident in comfortable position with call light within reach .
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675078
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5