F 0640
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate and complete discharge
MDS was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for
4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for discharge MDS assessments.
Residents Affected - Some
1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's discharge MDS was completed and transmitted.
2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's discharge MDS was completed and transmitted.
3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's discharge MDS was completed and transmitted.
4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's discharge MDS was completed and transmitted.
These deficient practices placed residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a
timely manner as required.
The findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet accessed on [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year
old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction with
hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side (stroke resulting in weakness and paralysis), Type
II diabetes (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses blood sugar), and local infection of the skin
and subcutaneous (under the skin) tissue.
Record review of Resident #1's EMR revealed a discharge summary signed by MD C indicating the
resident's discharge date was [DATE]. Resident #1's disposition was Acute care hospital.
Record review of Resident #1's EMR revealed a progress note signed by the DON dated [DATE] indicating
Resident #1 was still in the hospital and would not be returning to the facility.
Record review of Resident #1's electronic MDS assessments revealed no documented evidence of a
discharge MDS was completed or transmitted to CMS.
2. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet accessed on [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year
old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), encephalopathy (a
disease affecting the brain structure or function, causing altered mental state and confusion), and
end-stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys do not function normally and
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
675138
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675138
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Inspiration Hills Rehabilitation Center
1939 Bandera Rd
San Antonio, TX 78228
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0640
require external support to meet the daily requirements of life).
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
Record review of Resident #2's EMR revealed a progress note signed by LVN D dated [DATE] indicating
Resident #2 was picked up by transport ambulance and taken to the hospital for evaluation and treatment.
There were no additional progress notes in Resident #2's EMR.
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of Resident #2's electronic MDS assessments revealed no documented evidence of a
discharge MDS was completed or transmitted to CMS.
3. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet accessed on [DATE] revealed the resident was [AGE] year old
male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COVID-19 (a disease caused by a virus named
SARS-CoV-2) and Type II diabetes.
Record review of Resident #3's EMR revealed a progress noted dated [DATE] signed by LVN D that stated
Resident #3 was discharged to home in a personal vehicle accompanied by his spouse and another family
member with all his belongings and medications.
Record review of Resident #3's electronic MDS assessments revealed no documented evidence of a
discharge MDS was completed or transmitted to CMS.
4. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet accessed [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old
female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic
inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), Type II diabetes and acute kidney
failure.
Record review of Resident #4's EMR revealed the last note in the resident's progress note was dated
[DATE] and signed by LVN E, indicating Resident #4 expired and a call was placed to the resident's hospice
provider.
Record review of Resident #4's electronic MDS assessments revealed no documented evidence of a
discharge MDS was completed or transmitted to CMS.
During an interview on [DATE] at 2:02 PM with the Administrator, she stated LVN A left this facility to go to a
sister facility on [DATE]. Prior to his departure he had been the MDS LVN at this facility for 9 years. The
ADON took over the position of the MDS nurse on [DATE].
During an interview on [DATE] at 3:51 PM with LVN B she stated she had only been doing MDS work for
one week. She had been trained by her predecessor and the corporate office. LVN B stated she knew she
was supposed to submit an MDS for residents who were newly admitted , had a significant change,
quarterly, and upon their discharge.
During an interview on [DATE] at 4:05 PM with the DON she stated she knew the facility was cited in the
past for MDS assessments not being transmitted in a timely manner. She stated the LVN responsible for
their transmission at that time stated there wasn't a trigger in the EMR for him to submit the discharge MDS
for a resident who passed away. The DON further stated she was responsible for ensuring MDS
assessments were submitted on time.
During an interview on [DATE] at 4:20 PM with the Administrator and DON, they acknowledged Residents
#1, #2, #3 and #4 had all discharged from the facility on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675138
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675138
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/11/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Inspiration Hills Rehabilitation Center
1939 Bandera Rd
San Antonio, TX 78228
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0640
Level of Harm - Potential for
minimal harm
respectively. They further acknowledgeed a discharge MDS should have been completed on all four
residents, the discharge MDS assessments had not been completed, and the LVN responsible for their
completion no longer worked at the facility. The Administrator and DON both stated it was important to
properly close out the records of residents who had been discharged from the facility. The facility did not
have a policy on the submission of discharge MDS assessments.
Residents Affected - Some
Record review of the RAI Manual OBRA Assessment Summary, dated [DATE], revealed, Discharge refers
to the date a resident leaves the facility or the date the resident ' s Medicare Part A stay ends but the
resident remains in the facility. A day begins at 12:00 a.m. and ends at 11:59 p.m. Regardless of whether
discharge occurs at 12:00 a.m. or 11:59 p.m., this date is considered the actual date of discharge. There
are three types of discharges: two are OBRA required-return anticipated and return not anticipated; the
third is Medicare required-Part A PPS Discharge. A Discharge assessment is required with all three types
of discharges. Further review revealed Discharge Assessment refers to an assessment required on resident
discharge from the facility, or when a resident ' s Medicare Part A stay ends, but the resident remains in the
facility (unless it is an instance of an interrupted stay, as defined below). This assessment includes clinical
items for quality monitoring as well as discharge tracking information. Continued review revealed OBRA
Discharge assessments consist of discharge return anticipated and discharge return not anticipated. [ .]
Must be completed (item Z0500B) within 14 days after the discharge date (A2000 + 14 calendar days).
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675138
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3