F 0636
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every
12 months.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 calendar
days after admission as required for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents records reviewed for comprehensive
assessments and timing.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a completed admission/comprehensive MDS
assessment within 14 days following his admission to the facility.
This deficient practice could result in newly admitted residents not receiving the proper care required to
attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated admission record revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted
to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included: surgical aftercare following surgery on the
genitourinary system (surgery on the organs in the urinary system), malignant neoplasm of bladder
(bladder cancer), altered mental status, diabetes (high blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of
kidney function), muscle weakness, high blood pressure, chronic pain, heart disease, and heart failure.
Review of Resident #1's MDS summary screen in his EHR on 03/21/25 revealed Resident #1's admission
MDS was still in progress. His MDS was last edited on 3/18/25.
In an interview on 03/21/25 at 1:19 pm, the RRM stated that the CCM was responsible for completing MDS
assessments. She stated she knew about Resident #1's MDS not being completed on time because she
was working on it on 3/17/25 with the CCM before the CCM left early that day due to illness. She stated that
she was responsible for training the MDSC and that she had already gone over the timelines for
assessments with her. Additionally, she stated that the items that still remained for Resident #1's MDS
needed to be completed on-site.
In an interview on 03/21/25 at 1:28 pm, the ADM stated it was his expectation that MDS assessments be
completed on time and that he is aware the admission assessments must be done within 14 calendar days
of admission. He stated that the CCM was recently hired into that position, and before being promoted she
was a floor nurse. He stated she left early on 3/17/25 due to illness and that might be why the assessment
was not completed. He stated that the RRM helps out when needed. The ADM stated he was not sure what
a negative outcome to the residents would be for late MDS assessments.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
675144
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675144
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Burleson
600 Maple St
Burleson, TX 76028
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0636
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
During a telephone interview on 3/21/25 at 2:44 pm, the CCM stated that she originally started at the facility
in August of 2024 and was promoted in February 2025 to the CCM. She stated she had prior experience in
MDS but that was about 4-5 years ago, and she was having to learn all over again. She recalled doing an
admission assessment on Resident #1 and did not recall why it was not completed. She stated that the due
date would show up for her in the EHR. She further stated that she was trained by the RRM on timeliness,
and she was aware of the 14-day timeframe.
Review of the CCM's job description dated last revised 4/22/22 reflected under Essential Functions:
Manages the RAI Process from resident admission to discharge to maintain clinical compliance and receive
appropriate funding from Medicare, Medicaid and Managed Care pay sources. Completes MDS
assessments according to the LTC Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI) in a
timely, accurate, documentation-supported and case mix optimized manner. The job description was signed
by the CCM on 1/30/25.
Review of the CCM Checklist dated last revised 2/01/21 reflected, the CCM completed the MDS
Submission/Analyze/Validation training on 1/30/25.
Review of the facility's current MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes policy revised July 2017
reflected the following:
1. The Assessment Coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are
submitted to CMS' QIES Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with
current federal and state guidelines.
2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements
published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual.
Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1
dated last revised October 2024, required OBRA Assessments for the MDS table reflected that the
admission (comprehensive) assessment reference date is due no later than the 14th calendar day of the
resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days).
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675144
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675144
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Burleson
600 Maple St
Burleson, TX 76028
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate
catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary
catheter received treatment and services for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for indwelling urinary
catheters.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's urinary drainage bag tubing and bag were kept from touching and
resting on the floor.
This deficient practice could affect any resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and place them at risk of
developing or increased UTIs.
The findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated admission record revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted
to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included: surgical aftercare following surgery on the
genitourinary system (surgery on the organs in the urinary system), malignant neoplasm of bladder
(bladder cancer), altered mental status, diabetes (high blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of
kidney function), muscle weakness, high blood pressure, chronic pain, heart disease, and heart failure.
Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan, dated 3/06/25, revealed it addressed Resident #1's
urinary catheter. No intervention approaches were included to keep the urinary catheter securely in place.
No risks or complications were listed. Additionally, the care plan addressed a problem start date of 3/10/25
for I pull off my urostomy and that staff will notify nurse if resident removes urostomy.
Observation on 3/21/25 at 10:12 a.m., revealed Resident #1 resting in bed. The Foley Catheter drainage
bag and tubing were resting directly on the floor on the right side of his bed. The drainage bag was nearly
empty, but the tube closest to Resident #1's midsection had urine in it. The drainage bag was only visible if
someone walked into the resident's room. The left side of his bed was against the wall closest to the door.
An additional observation on 3/21/25 at 11:05 am, revealed Resident #1 resting in bed with the Foley
Catheter bag inside a privacy bag resting directly on the floor on the right side of his bed. The surveyor
attempted to obtain an interview with Resident #1, but he preferred to sleep.
An interview on 3/21/25 at 1:32 PM with Resident #1's FM revealed that Resident #1 had recently
experienced a decline and the FM was devastated they were having to meet with a hospice agency that
day. The FM stated that Resident #1 had a urostomy as well as an indwelling catheter and for some reason
the urostomy was not adhering to Resident #1's skin very well. The FM also acknowledged awareness of
Resident #1 kicking the drainage bag off his bedside during his sleep and expressed a wish for that to be
managed by the facility to keep the bag from being on the floor.
An interview on 3/21/25 at 2:10 p.m., the DON revealed Resident #1's catheter drainage bag and tubing
should not have been touching the floor because the bag and tubing would get contaminated and could
cause infections. The DON stated that if the drainage bag was covered by a privacy bag and
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675144
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675144
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
03/21/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Burleson
600 Maple St
Burleson, TX 76028
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0690
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
knocked to the ground staff could place the bag back onto the bed hook, but if the drainage bag is outside
of the privacy bag, they would need to replace the drainage bag due to infection control issues. She stated
that when colostomy/urostomy/catheter care is performed all supplies needed for the care should be
brought into the room so that the staff are not having to leave and get other supplies before the care is
completed. When asked if there was anything they could do to keep the catheter bag off the floor she stated
she would need to get with the ADM to see what interventions he has used in the past.
An interview on 3/21/25 at 11:19 a.m., CNA A revealed she had worked at the facility since August 2024.
She stated during catheter care they were trained to make sure the catheter bag was toward the end of the
bed when hanging them, and to ensure residents stayed clean by changing their briefs often and cleansing
their skin. She stated that Resident #1 tended to kick his catheter bag onto the ground, sometimes he was
calm but sometimes had outbursts like taking off all his clothes and talking like he saw people in his room
who were not there. She stated the catheter bag was to be hooked onto the bed, not necessarily in a
certain place, but just to keep it downward so it can drain/flow right. She stated it was always supposed to
be covered with a privacy bag. If a privacy bag was not in there, they would get a new one from the supply
room. She did not know if he tended to take his urostomy out or not. She is unsure if he toileted himself to
have bowel movements. She stated that he was 1 of 2 residents on his hall and the CNAs rotate who work
that hall so she does not have much experience with him but from the few times she had worked with him
those were her observations.
An interview on 3/21/25 at 12:01 p.m., the ADON revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a
catheter and urostomy. She stated they had to change his catheter bag often, and that he recently had the
urostomy placed, but for some reason it would not stick to his skin, and that when he sat himself up, it
would come loose. She stated they contacted the doctor to look at it, and the doctor made a visit on 3/20 to
observe the area on his skin, and he recommended a different kind of tape be used. She stated they had a
urine panel come back on 3/19 but it said it was still pending the results of a UTI. She further stated they
had to do frequent monitoring with him regarding the catheter bag, and if a CNA observes the bag on the
ground, they were to tell the ADON, and if they found it on the floor, they had to replace it due to infection
control procedures. She also stated that the privacy bag should be on there at all times. The ADON stated
that there was not any one CNA in particular who had the most experience working with Resident #1 as the
CNA's rotated working that hall.
Record review of facility policy titled Catheter Care dated 12/2023 indicated:
It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter
care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use.
1. Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel.
2. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use.
3. Privacy bags will be changed out when soiled, with a catheter change or as needed.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675144
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4