Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

GRANDVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTERCMS #6753691 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to revise comprehensive person-centered care plans for three (3) of nine (9) residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update the care plans for Residents #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 to match the dietary orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met and communicated to providers in a timely manner and could result in injury and a decline in physical well-being. Findings included:Resident #1 Review of face sheet, dated 8/24/2025, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease (progressive neurological disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), Type 2 diabetes (blood sugar regulation disorder), heart Failure, muscle weakness, and dementia (loss of cognitive memory ability).Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS of 8 suggesting mild cognitive impairment. MDS section K on nutritional status reflected resident had no swallowing difficulties but was on a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #'1 dietary order, dated 3/28/2023, reflected: NAS, LCS diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 8/24/2025 reflected the focus: [Resident #1] is on a minced moist no addedsalt, low concentrated sweet diet related to his diagnosis of hypertension and Diabetes. Resident #2 Review of face sheet, dated 8/24/2025, revealed Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes (blood sugar regulation disorder), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral infarction (stroke - brain attack due to bleed or blockage.) Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS of 15, suggesting no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's dietary order, dated 12/22/2023, reflected: NAS, LCS diet, Mechanical Soft texture, Regular consistency.Review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 8/24/2025, reflected the focus: She is on a Regular, no added salt, low concentrated sweets diet related to her diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes. Resident #3 Review of face sheet, dated 8/24/2025, revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Sepsis (systemic infection), heart failure, Encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function of structure), Urinary Tract infection, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS of 11 suggesting mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's orders reflected she had a dietary order, dated 4/10/2025, Regular diet, Mechanical Soft texture, Regular consistency. Review of Resident #3's care plan dated, 8/254/2025, reflected the focus, She is on a Regular diet. She has avitamin D deficiency.During an interview on 8/24/2025 at 6:07 pm, the MDS coordinator stated it was her responsibility to ensure [care plans were updated to match diet orders. She stated when she reviewed the care plans for Resident's #1, #2 and #3 on 8/24/2025, they did not match the orders. She stated she did not remember how long ago the orders were changed or why they did not get updated (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675369 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675369 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/24/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Grandview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 301 W Criner St Grandview, TX 76050 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete on the care plans. She stated it was important that the care plan match the order so everybody knows what goes with each resident and how to care for them, so we care for them correctly. She stated she had reviewed Resident #1's care plan and realized his diet was not correct and then found several other care plans that were not correct. She stated she started an audit today of all the care plans to ensure the diet orders matched the care plan. During an interview on 8/24/2025 at 6:25 pm, the DON stated she was not aware the diet orders did not match the care plans. She stated he was important for care plans to match because it gives you the snapshot of what the resident needs and if the orders didn't get carried out correctly it could make them sick, worsen their condition. There could be choking, and this could end very poorly [including] in death. She stated the MDS coordinator was responsible for updating care plans but ultimately at the end of the say it is her [DON] that is responsible. During an interview on 8/24/2025 at 6:39 pm, the ADM stated she was not aware the care plans did not match the diet orders. She stated it was the MDS coordinator's responsibility to update the care plan with day-to-day changes. She said ultimately it was the DON's responsibility to ensure the care plans were correct and then herself [ADM]. She stated there was a diet order report that she would pull and give to dietary to ensure all the diet cards in the kitchen were correct. She stated a review of the dietary cards for all the residents reflected the current orders and diet cards were correct and only the care plans were not correct. She stated she would start running the diet order report and give it to the MDS coordinator to ensure the care plans are correct. ADM stated they had their annual survey the beginning of May 2025 and the facility had been cited for accuracy of their care plans. She stated they completed their plan of correction, continued their audit of the care plans, but had not yet gotten to an audit of the dietary focus areas. Review of facility policy, dated 1/6/2025, titled Comprehensive Care Plans reflected: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan foreach resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meeta resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified inthe resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. 5. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. Event ID: Facility ID: 675369 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0656GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F656 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 24, 2025 survey of GRANDVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of GRANDVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER on August 24, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at GRANDVIEW NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER on August 24, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be ..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.