Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

THE VILLAGE AT HERITAGE OAKSCMS #6755811 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0558 Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident rights in that: Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to ensure Residents #1's call light was within reach on 03/22/2025. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 03/22/2025 documented an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: hypertensive heart disease with heart failure(high blood pressure damage the heart and blood vessels), hyperlipidemia(high levels of fat particles in the blood),hypokalemia(blood level that s below normal that result in fatigue, muscle cramps, and abnormal heart rhythms),parkinsonism(cause tremors and slow movements, and depression(sadness). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/05/2025, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 12 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance in the areas of Toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, and putting on /taking off footwear. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 03/22/2025, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for ADL self-care performance deficit r/t impaired balance, stroke, and PD. Resident # 1 had an intervention of: Encourage Resident #1 to use call light for assistance. Observation on 03/22/2025 at 12:50 PM., revealed Resident #1's call light was under her bed, in the middle, not in reach. During an interview on 03/22/2025 at 12:50 PM, Resident #1 stated it had been out of reach since early morning. Resident # 1 was not able to recall how long the call light was not in reach or the last time staff had come in to assist her. Resident # 1 stated she needed to be changed and was waiting on staff to pass by her room to call out for staff to assist her. Resident # 1 stated when the call light was not in reach, she would just wait for staff to come to her room. Resident # 1 stated she really didn't want to say too much because she had to stay there and did not want the facility to retaliate against her (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675581 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675581 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/23/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE The Village at Heritage Oaks 3002 W 2nd Ave Corsicana, TX 75110 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few During an interview on 03/22/2025 at 2:29 PM, CNA A stated CNAs should make rounds at least every two hours or as needed. CNA A stated that CNAs should be checking to see if call lights were in reach. CNA A stated she had left Resident # 1's room around 12:30 PM, and the call light was in place when she had entered the room (time entered not recalled). CNA A stated the call light may have fell of when she made Resident #1's bed. CNA A stated she could not recall if the call light was tied to the bed rail when she had left Resident #1's room. CNA A stated if a resident's call light was not within reach, then the resident needs would not have been met. During an interview on 03/22/2025 at 3:10 PM, the DON stated that anyone that entered the resident's room was responsible for ensuring the call light was within reach. The DON stated the purpose of a call light was for resident to notify staff when they needed assistance. The DON stated if a resident's call light was not in reach, then the resident could have an unmet need. The DON stated her expectation was that all resident's call lights were always within reach so the resident could notify staff they need assistance. During an interview on 03/23/2025 at 1:45 PM, the ADM stated the purpose of call light was for the residents to alert staff when they needed assistance. The ADM stated it was everyone's responsibility to ensure call lights were always within reach. The ADM stated that if a call light was not within reach, then a resident desired need would not be met. The ADM stated that she expected for call lights to be always within reach and answered timely. Review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, implemented 05/01/2024 and revised 05/01/2024, reflected, Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light to allow residents to call for assistance. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 1. All staff will be educated on the proper use of the resident call system, including how the system works and ensuring resident access to the call light. 5. .Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured, as needed. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675581 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0558GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F558 - The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 23, 2025 survey of THE VILLAGE AT HERITAGE OAKS?

This was a inspection survey of THE VILLAGE AT HERITAGE OAKS on March 23, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at THE VILLAGE AT HERITAGE OAKS on March 23, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

SourceView on CMS Care Compare

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.