F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive
person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's
medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical,
mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for care plans. The facility
failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed Resident #31's behaviors.
This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or
services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs.Findings included: Record review
of Resident #31's face sheet dated 12/31/25, revealed admission on [DATE] to the facility. Diagnoses
included dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusions, hallucinations, and depression. Record review of
Resident #31's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive
impairment and disorganized thinking was also coded in this section. Mood was not coded. Behaviors
section E - Rejection of care and wandering were both coded as a 1 which indicated these behaviors
occurred 1 to 3 days during this look back period. Record review of Resident #31's Care Plan dated
4/16/2025, revealed there was no focus, goal, or intervention section for Resident #31's history of
wandering or rejection of care. During an interview on 12/31/25 at 1:45 PM, with the DON she stated these
behaviors should have been care planned because it was part of the resident's behavior and needed to be
documented. The DON stated the MDS department was responsible for ensuring that it was care planned.
The DON stated the purpose of the care plan was to provide the care for the resident and for everyone to
know what the resident needed. The DON stated that it was necessary for the care of the resident. During
an interview on 12/31/25 at 2:29 PM, with the MDS coordinator, she stated it was the responsibility of the
MDS department to ensure the care plans were correct. The MDS coordinator stated there was no
wandering or rejection of care, care planned for Resident #31. The MDS coordinator stated it should have
been care planned for Resident #31's wandering to be able to keep an eye on her. The MDS coordinator
stated the purpose of the care plan was to notify the staff of Resident #31's behaviors. The MDS
coordinator stated the risk could be needs not being met. Record review of the facility Care Planning policy
dated 03/2022, revealed 1. The IDT in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal
representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident.7.
The comprehensive person-centered care plan:b. Describes the services that are to be furnished to attain
or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 5
Event ID:
675599
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675599
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St
Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate
supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for
transfers in that: NA A and CNA B failed to safely transfer Resident #3 with a gait belt. CNA C and CNA D
failed to demonstrate the skills to safely transfer the DON. These failures could place residents at risk for
injuries due to not receiving the appropriate level of assistance to prevent accidents.Findings included:
Review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 12/30/25 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a neurological
disorder causing movement and cognitive impairment), muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet.
Resident #3 was on hospice. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS Assessment, dated 11/25/25,
revealed:Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 3 of 15 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). He showed
signs of delirium including inattention and disorganized thinking that fluctuated.Resident #3 had upper and
lower range of motion impairment on both sides.Resident #3 used a wheelchair.Resident #3 needed
substantial to maximum assistance with transfers. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed:Initiated
11/28/25: Focus: Resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, and
Parkinson's Disease. Goal: Declines will be addressed promptly. Identified interventions included: Transfer
with one assist. Initiated 11/28/25 Focus: The resident has Parkinson's. Goal: Discomfort or complications
related to Parkinson's disease through review date will be addressed promptly. Identified interventions
included: encourage daily exercise, mobility as tolerated. Observation on 12/30/2025 at 10:42 AM revealed
Resident #3 was in the recliner, CNA B put a gait belt on Resident #3. NA A and CNA B locked the
wheelchair and helped Resident #3 slide forward to the edge of the recliner. NA A held the gait belt in the
back and slid her arm under Resident #3's arm. CNA B held the front of the gait belt and held Resident #3's
pants by the waistband. The aides assisted Resident #3 in standing and pivoting to the wheelchair.
Interview on 12/30/2025 at 11:14 AM NA A stated she was a new aide and received training on transfers
prior to working the floor. NA A stated she was trained to make sure the gait belt was on, the wheels were
locked, the resident had non-slip footwear on, and make sure the resident's knees touched the sitting
surface prior to the resident sitting down. NA A said she thought the transfer went pretty well and they
completed the transfer how they were shown. NA A said she might be wrong in putting her arm under
Resident #3's arm. NA A said she thought being lifted by the arm felt tight and pressured and was not
comfortable. Interview on 12/30/2025 at 11:43 AM CNA B said she worked at the facility for 4 years. CNA B
said she received training in how to do a two-person gait-belt transfer. CNA B stated she was trained to
have each aide stand on either side of the resident, put on the gait belt, make sure the resident was ready,
that the resident had a good foot surface, then help them stand, pivot and sit down. CNA B said she was
trained that an arm went under the resident's arm when assisting the resident to stand. CNA B stated she
thought she did that and was confident in how she did. CNA B said pulling up a resident by the seat of the
pants could cause a skin tear and could be uncomfortable. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 9:50 AM the PTA E
stated she was at the facility for over two years. PTA E stated Resident #3 was receiving therapy services
and they worked on standing and safety awareness. PTA E stated the level of assistance Resident #3
needed fluctuated from a one person to a two-person transfer. PTA E stated for two-person assistance, the
staff needed to put a gait belt on, one staff stand in front of the resident while the other stood behind
guiding the resident to the wheelchair. PTA E stated hooking under a resident's arm was not supposed to
be done during transfers. PTA E said she was not
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675599
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675599
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St
Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
sure about the consequences, but it could hurt the shoulder. PTA E stated she did see the aides transfer by
hooking under the arms. PTA E said she did not usually transfer residents by the waistband of their pants.
Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:02 AM the PT stated a safe two-person gait-belt transfer looked like
someone in front of the resident and someone behind the resident controlling the transfer from the
resident's hips. The PT stated the therapy department did not do specific training with the aides on how to
do a transfer, but they did talk to the aides constantly about what kind of transfer a resident needed. The PT
said aides did not want to lift residents by the shoulders because the aides needed more control and it was
not safe. The PT said aides needed to be careful with the arms because it could pull or dislocate the arm.
The PT said using the gait belt in front and grabbing the waistband was not the safest and did not give
enough control. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:21 AM the DON stated the facility did train aides to complete
a two person gait belt transfer. The DON stated they trained the staff to have one staff in front and one staff
behind to assist with the stand and pivot maneuver. Observation on 12/31/2025 at 10:27 AM CNA C and
CNA D demonstrated a two-person gait-belt transfer on the DON. The CNAs placed the gait belt around
DON's waist. Each held the gait-belt in the back and assisted the DON to stand by holding the DON's
forearm. The CNAs completed the sitting transfers also by holding the DON's forearm. Interview on
12/31/2025 at 10:29 AM the DON stated the ADON did train the aides to complete the transfer that way.
The DON said the ADON was out of town on vacation and unable to be reached. The DON said aides were
instructed not to pull or tug on the residents' arms. The DON said hooking an arm under the resident's arm
was uncomfortable could cause skin tears and bruising and it was not a safe transfer. The DON stated
grabbing a resident by the waistband could cause a wedgie and was not comfortable. The DON said the
consequence of holding a resident under the arm could cause injury like skin tears or bruising. The DON
said the facility did a skills fair training where they checked aides off on two-person gait-belt transfers. The
DON said the purpose of the gait belt was to slow down a fall. The DON said transfers were not
continuously monitored. The DON said the ADON and charge nurses were responsible for keeping an eye
on transfers. Review of the facility's policy and procedure on Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents,
revised 7/2017, revealed: In order to protect the safety and wellbeing of staff and residents, and to promote
quality of care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Resident
safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the
safe lifting and moving of residents. Review of the Training Inservice Summary for Skills Fair, completed
5/27/25, revealed the facility in-serviced staff for annual compliance and competency training. CNAs were
trained in mechanical lifting and incontinent care. Methodology included lectures, handouts, and
demonstration with a hands on skills training.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675599
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675599
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St
Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way
that maximizes each resident's well being.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to
demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 1 (Resident #3)
of 4 residents reviewed for competent nursing staff, in that: NA A and CNA B failed to safely transfer
Resident #3 with a gait belt. CNA C and CNA D failed to demonstrate the skills to safely transfer the DON
using a gait belt. These failures could place residents at risk for injuries due to not receiving the appropriate
level of assistance to prevent accidents.Findings included: Review of Resident #3's admission Record,
dated 12/30/25 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses
which included Parkinson's Disease (a neurological disorder causing movement and cognitive impairment),
muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Resident #3 was on hospice. Review of Resident #3's
admission MDS Assessment, dated 11/25/25, revealed:Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 3 of 15 (indicating
severe cognitive impairment). He showed signs of delirium including inattention and disorganized thinking
that fluctuated.Resident #3 had upper and lower range of motion impairment on both sides.Resident #3
used a wheelchair.Resident #3 needed substantial to maximum assistance with transfers. Review of
Resident #3's Care Plan revealed:Initiated 11/28/25: Focus: Resident had an ADL self-care performance
deficit related to activity intolerance, and Parkinson's Disease. Goal: Declines will be addressed promptly.
Identified interventions included: Transfer with one assist. Initiated 11/28/25 Focus: The resident has
Parkinson's. Goal: Discomfort or complications related to Parkinson's disease through review date will be
addressed promptly. Identified interventions included: encourage daily exercise, mobility as tolerated.
Observation on 12/30/2025 at 10:42 AM revealed Resident #3 was in the recliner, CNA B put a gait belt on
Resident #3. NA A and CNA B locked the wheelchair and helped Resident #3 slide forward to the edge of
the recliner. NA A held the gait belt in the back and slid her arm under Resident #3's arm. CNA B held the
front of the gait belt and held Resident #3's pants by the waistband. The aides assisted Resident #3 in
standing and pivoting to the wheelchair. Interview on 12/30/2025 at 11:14 AM NA A stated she was a new
aide and received training on transfers prior to working the floor. NA A stated she was trained to make sure
the gait belt was on, the wheels were locked, the resident had non-slip footwear on, and make sure the
resident's knees touched the sitting surface prior to the resident sitting down. NA A said she thought the
transfer went pretty well and they completed the transfer how they were shown. NA A said she might be
wrong in putting her arm under Resident #3's arm. NA A said she thought being lifted by the arm felt tight
and pressured and was not comfortable. Interview on 12/30/2025 at 11:43 AM CNA B said she worked at
the facility for 4 years. CNA B said she received training in how to do a two-person gait-belt transfer. CNA B
stated she was trained to have each aide stand on either side of the resident, put on the gait belt, make
sure the resident was ready, that the resident had a good foot surface, then help them stand, pivot and sit
down. CNA B said she was trained that an arm went under the resident's arm when assisting the resident
to stand. CNA B stated she thought she did that and was confident in how she did. CNA B said pulling up a
resident by the seat of the pants could cause a skin tear and could be uncomfortable. Interview on
12/31/2025 at 9:50 AM the PTA E stated she was at the facility for over two years. PTA E stated Resident
#3 was receiving therapy services and they worked on standing and safety awareness. PTA E stated the
level of assistance Resident #3 needed fluctuated from a one person to a two-person transfer. PTA E stated
for two-person assistance, the staff needed to put a gait belt on, one staff stand in front of the resident while
the other stood behind guiding the resident to the wheelchair. PTA E stated hooking
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675599
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 5
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675599
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St
Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0726
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
under a resident's arm was not supposed to be done during transfers. PTA E said she was not sure about
the consequences, but it could hurt the shoulder. PTA E stated she did see the aides transfer by hooking
under the arms. PTA E said she did not usually transfer residents by the waistband of their pants. Interview
on 12/31/2025 at 10:02 AM the PT stated a safe two-person gait-belt transfer looked like someone in front
of the resident and someone behind the resident controlling the transfer from the resident's hips. The PT
stated the therapy department did not do specific training with the aides on how to do a transfer, but they
did talk to the aides constantly about what kind of transfer a resident needed. The PT said aides did not
want to lift residents by the shoulders because the aides needed more control and it was not safe. The PT
said aides needed to be careful with the arms because it could pull or dislocate the arm. The PT said using
the gait belt in front and grabbing the waistband was not the safest and did not give enough control.
Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:21 AM the DON stated the facility did train aides to complete a two person
gait belt transfer. The DON stated they trained the staff to have one staff in front and one staff behind to
assist with the stand and pivot maneuver. Observation on 12/31/2025 at 10:27 AM CNA C and CNA D
demonstrated a two-person gait-belt transfer on the DON. The CNAs placed the gait belt around DON's
waist. Each held the gait-belt in the back and assisted the DON to stand by holding the DON's forearm. The
CNAs completed the sitting transfers also by holding the DON's forearm. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:29
AM the DON stated the ADON did train the aides to complete the transfer that way. The DON said the
ADON was out of town on vacation and unable to be reached. The DON said aides were instructed not to
pull or tug on the residents' arms. The DON said hooking an arm under the resident's arm was
uncomfortable could cause skin tears and bruising and it was not a safe transfer. The DON stated grabbing
a resident by the waistband could cause a wedgie and was not comfortable. The DON said the
consequence of holding a resident under the arm could cause injury like skin tears or bruising. The DON
said the facility did a skills fair training where they checked aides off on two-person gait-belt transfers. The
DON said the purpose of the gait belt was to slow down a fall. The DON said transfers were not
continuously monitored. The DON said the ADON and charge nurses were responsible for keeping an eye
on transfers. Review of the facility's policy and procedure on Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents,
revised 7/2017, revealed: In order to protect the safety and wellbeing of staff and residents, and to promote
quality of care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Resident
safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the
safe lifting and moving of residents. Review of the Training Inservice Summary for Skills Fair, completed
5/27/25, revealed the facility in-serviced staff for annual compliance and competency training. CNAs were
trained in mechanical lifting and incontinent care. Methodology included lectures, handouts, and
demonstration with a hands on skills training.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675599
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 5