Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTERCMS #6756331 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #279) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, and accurately documented for Resident #279. This failure could affect residents by not having their preferences honored concerning advanced directives . Findings included: Record review on [DATE] of Resident #297's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a DNR status and a diagnosis of, unspecified fracture of right femur, and heart disease. Resident #297's Record Review on [DATE] of Resident #297's MDS Section C Cognitive Status, indicated the residents BIMS was 13 (cognitively intact). Record review on [DATE] of Resident #297's physician's orders dated [DATE] revealed there was an order for DNR. Resident #297's CP (Care Plan) dated [DATE] revealed she had a MPA (Medical Power of Attorney) on file with a Full Code status. Record review on [DATE] of Resident #297's electronic health record from [DATE] through [DATE] revealed there was no evidence of the following: *Advanced Directive for Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Order (OOH-DNR) form; *Progress notes related to the DNR status; *Preadmission Advanced Directive Information form; *Advanced Directive for Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Order (OOH-DNR) verbal assessment. During an interview and Record Review on [DATE] at 10:30 AM the DON stated Resident #297's code status was DNR and had documentation of the Physician order in the electronic chart. The DON stated there was a book at the nurse's station that revealed if residents had a DNR code status DNR, indicated (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675633 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675633 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/17/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center 1201 Holland Lake Dr Weatherford, TX 76086 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few by a RED paper, and Full code status, indicated by a green paper. She stated the SW may have the signed consent on her desk if she was a new admission. The DON reviewed Resident #297's CP and stated the resident was a Full Code status, she must have placed the DNR order on the wrong resident and would go take it out of PCC (electronic charting) immediately. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:48 AM the SW stated Resident #297 was a Full Code and did not have a DNR status or a consent form for her. She stated Resident #297's CP also revealed a Full Code status. The SW stated she did not know what the floor nurses looked at during a code, whether it be the book at the nurse's station or the electronic charting. Record Review of the DNR book dated [DATE] revealed Resident #297 had a green paper that indicated a full code status. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:05 AM, LVN A stated when a resident had a code she looks at the electronic charting for that resident. She revealed in PCC where she would have looked for the resident code status (DNR/Full code) under resident name. LVNA stated, if the resident was sent to the ER, the code status would then have looked at the code status book. She stated if there was a DNR status for that resident there would have also been an order, which would verify a consent that the status would be correct. LVN A stated there would be a negative impact to resident with time lost to being resuscitated. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:15 PM the DON stated she was at home and misunderstood her SW when she called to place the code status order and was a mistake on her part. The DON stated the negative impact for resident would have been, residents have not gotten the correct medical treatment such as CPR if a Full code. She stated it was a typo on her (DON) part, as she misunderstood the SW's text message to place an order for DNR status for Resident #297. The DON stated her expectations was for the resident to fill out the paperwork on admission as well as not relying on texts. She stated the nurse placing the order for the DNR status would be present to verify the consent form. Record review of the facility's undated DNR policy on [DATE] revealed there was no evidence that addressed entering the wrong code status on a Resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675633 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 17, 2024 survey of HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER on October 17, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER on October 17, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.