Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTERCMS #6756331 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0880 Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for two (Resident #1 and, Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for infection control in that:-LVN A failed to perform hand hygiene and changed her gloves at the appropriate times while providing urostomy care for Resident #1.-CNA B failed to perform hand hygiene and change his gloves at the appropriate times while providing incontinence care for Resident #2.These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/16/25, revealed a 90- year- old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (occurs when an injury or disease disrupts the electrical signals between the nervous system and bladder function), muscle weakness and Alzheimer's disease (a degenerative brain disorder that leads to a progressive and irreversible decline in memory and cognitive abilities). Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 09/01/25, revealed Resident #1 required total dependence with most ADLs and one-person assistance with transfer. Resident #1 had a urostomy (a device that redirects the ureter (transport tube) to the abdomen to bypass the bladder after bladder or urinary tract problems). Review of Resident #1 's care plan, dated 09/18/25, revealed Resident #1 had urostomy due to diagnosis of bladder obstruction. The Its goal was to show no signs and symptoms of urinary infection through review date of 09/28/25. Observation of urostomy care on Resident #1 on 10/15/25 at 1:30 p.m. revealed LVN A washed her hands and put on gloves before the start of care. She prepared a clean field on a bedside table. LVN A removed Resident #1's brief. She emptied the urine from the pouch and removed the whole pouching system. The drained urine was clear yellow without sediments. She cleansed the stoma (a surgically created opening in the skin). There was no swelling, irritation or redness noted on the stoma area. LVN A's gloves were visibly soiled. She did not change gloves, washed her hands, or performed hand hygiene. She retrieved a new pouching system with the same soiled gloves. She prepped the skin area before inserting a new pouch system. LVN A used the same soiled gloves throughout the urostomy care. She removed her gloves and washed her hands. LVN A picked up the trash before exiting Resident #1's room. During In an interview on 10/15/25 at 1:46 p.m., LVN A said she was employed by the facility since February 2025 and received infection control training about 3 months ago. LVN A stated she should have washed her hands and performed hand hygiene before picking up the new and clean pouching system for the urostomy. LVN A said she was nervous., She said that was the reason she failed to follow a good infection control practice. She noted Resident #1 could get an infection and become sick. Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 10/16/25, revealed the resident was an 81- year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of retention of urine, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder ((occurs when an injury or disease disrupts the electrical Residents Affected - Some (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675633 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675633 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/03/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center 1201 Holland Lake Dr Weatherford, TX 76086 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0880 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete signals between the nervous system and bladder function), presence of urogenital implants (a medical device used to treat various conditions of urinary incontinence), constipation, muscle weakness, and dementia ( a general term for a decline in cognitive functions that interferes with daily activities). Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/09/25, revealed Resident #2 required moderate assistance with most ADLs and one person assistance. Resident #1 was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 10/14/23, revealed a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder with history of retention. During an observation of incontinence care for Resident #2] on 10/16/25 at 12:45 a.m., CNA B did not wash his hands but put on gloves before the start of care. He removed Resident #2's fecal matter soiled brief. CNA B wiped the resident from front to back. He made five strokes of cleaning with the same soiled wipes. CNA A did not change his gloves and continued to clean Resident #2. CNA B's gloves were visibly soiled with fecal matter. He did not wash his hands, change gloves, or perform hand hygiene before putting on Resident #2's clean brief, and placing it underneath the resident, and fastened.it. CNA B retrieved the trash and walked out of Resident #2's room without washing his hands. During In an interview on 10/16/2052 at 12:58a.m, CNA B stated he was employed by the facility for about two 2 years. CNA B stated he could not remember the last time he received infection control training. He noted that night shift employees don't receive much training on infection control. CNA B stated cross contamination meant mixing clean with dirty. He stated he should have washed his hands and changed gloves at the appropriate times while providing care. He stated Resident #2 could get an infection as a result of for not using good infection control practices. During an interview on 10/16/25 at 1:34 p.m. the DON stated being aware of some of the concerns raised about infection control practice. She stated she and ADON C were responsible for infection control in the facility. The DON stated employees received training on hire and annually. She noted that she conducts spot checks and training with return demonstration periodically. The DON explained aides were expected to follow standard precautions including washing hands and changing gloves while providing care. The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2015, revealed the following:Policy Statement:This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections.Policy Interpretation and Implementation1) All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections.2) All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors.3) Hand hygiene products and supplies (sinks, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use to encourage compliance with hand hygiene policies.4) E-containing soaps will not be used.5) Residents, family members and/or visitors will be encouraged to practice hand hygiene through the use of fact sheets, pamphlets and/or other written materials provided at the time of admission and/or posted throughout the facility. 6) Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations:a. When hands are visibly soiled; andb. After contact with a resident with infectious diarrhea including, but not limited to infections caused by norovirus, salmonella, shigella and C. difficile. Event ID: Facility ID: 675633 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0880GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F880 - Infection Control

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 3, 2025 survey of HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER on December 3, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at HOLLAND LAKE REHABILITATION AND WELLNESS CENTER on December 3, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.