F 0641
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately
reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments.
Residents Affected - Few
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded on his Quarterly MDS assessment, signed as
completed on 02/11/2025, for a fall with major injury that occurred on 01/12/2025.
This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their
physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He
was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
Record review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report, dated 04/17/2025, reflected a primary and admitting
diagnosis of Hemiplegia (partial to complete loss of muscle function of one side of the body) and
Hemiparesis (muscle weakness of one side of the body) following an unspecified cerebrovascular disease
(a group of conditions that affect the blood flow and blood vessels in the brain) affecting the left
non-dominant side, epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizures), and other reduced mobility.
Record review of Resident #1's Nursing Note, dated 01/12/2025 at 09:31 p.m. by LPN A, reflected Resident
#1 had an unwitnessed fall in his room on 01/12/2024. LPN A noted the fall caused a fracture to Left leg.
Record review of Resident #1's Fall Nurses Note 12hr, signed 01/17/2025 with effective date 01/15/2025 by
LPN A, reflected Resident #1 sustained a fracture to his left leg with swelling and a brace applied for
intervention.
Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, signed as completed on 02/11/2025 by the RN
Assessment Coordinator B, reflected assessment observation end date of 01/29/2025. Resident #1 had a
BIMS score of 10 indicating he was mildly impaired, he required substantial/maximal assistance for
transferring from lying to sitting on the side of the bed or sitting to standing; and he had two or more falls
since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment with no injury. He was documented as had no
major injury since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment. The assessment description for major
injury included bone fractures.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
675638
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675638
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Twin Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation
3301 E Mockingbird LN
Victoria, TX 77904
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
An observation and interview with Resident #1 on 04/17/2025 at 04:25 p.m., revealed Resident #1 was
lying in his bed with his head and shoulders slighted elevated watching television. Resident #1 appeared
clean and groomed. His call light, a side table, and a bedside urinal bottle were in reach. The resident had
two grab bars attached to both sides of his upper bed. Resident #1 revealed he had fallen a couple times at
the facility. He stated on one fall he broke his leg. He stated staff responded okay and he felt safe at the
facility. He revealed he continued to go to therapy.
During an interview on 04/17/2025 at 05:55 p.m., RN Assessment Coordinator B stated for falls, the DON
would discuss the falls that were active or historical with the care team. She stated the DON was also
responsible for care planning and assigning the interventions for a resident. She stated the facility had not
had a DON since around Thanksgiving of the prior year, and the new DON had just started. She stated
without a DON, the responsibility had fallen to the ADONs. She stated she and the other facility MDS
Assessment Coordinator were responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the MDS Assessments; however,
she stated they had to go off the information they could see, and they did not have a system in place to
manually track the facility falls. She revealed when completing an MDS assessment there was a tab in the
EMR that would trigger for any active or historical falls the resident being assessed had. She revealed when
the information on a fall or incident was not completed or still open, then that fall history would not pull into
the information they used to complete the assessments. She stated a missed fall on the MDS assessment
would not have impacted the resident's care in the slightest if the care plan was updated with the
interventions enacted for that fall.
During an interview and record review on 04/17/2025 at 06:21 p.m., RN Assessment Coordinator B stated
in the EMR, when reviewing the risk management tab, it showed a resident's active incidents and, on
another page, the closed incidents. Record review of Resident #1's Historical Incidents Report, undated
and accessed on 04/17/2025 by RN Assessment Coordinator B, revealed Resident #1 had a fall incident on
01/12/2025 at 08:05 p.m. The incident was noted as closed on 03/11/2025 at 02:50 p.m. RN Assessment
Coordinator B stated she assumed Resident #1's fall on 01/12/2025 was not closed until 03/11/2025
because they were unable to determine his injury.
During an interview on 04/17/2025 at 07:13 p.m., the DON stated she had just started working at the facility
on 04/09/2025. She stated it would be the MDS Coordinator's responsibility to ensure the MDS
assessments were accurate. She stated an RN was required to review a completed MDS assessment and
sign it to indicate the assessment was accurate and complete. She stated if an MDS assessment was not
accurate for fall history, but the care plan was updated with the appropriate interventions following the fall,
then the inaccuracy in the assessment would not impact the resident's care.
During an interview on 04/17/2025 at 07:18 p.m., the ADMIN revealed every weekday morning she would
go over the incidents and accidents that occurred during the night with the care team, and then the care
team would also have a stand down meeting at the end of the day to discuss anything that happened
during that day. She stated she also believed incidents and accidents would appear on the staff's
dashboard when they logged into the EMR. She stated during the care team discussions, they discussed
what happened, interventions, and the necessity to update the care plan. She stated the MDS Coordinators
were supposed to attend both daily meetings. She stated she believed it was the MDS Consultant's
responsibility to initially catch MDS errors, but the facility also had a compliance nurse. She stated the MDS
Coordinator would sign the MDS Assessments, but then the MDS Consultant would check them. She
stated she was unsure if the MDS Consultant checked every MDS Assessment. The ADMIN stated the
DON would normally be the person responsible for completing the facility incident documentation in the
EMR, but in the absence of the DON, the compliance nurse was working on them. She stated the
compliance nurse would have been able to see if any incidents
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675638
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675638
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/17/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Twin Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation
3301 E Mockingbird LN
Victoria, TX 77904
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0641
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
were still open and she was usually at the facility weekly or able to do them offsite. The ADMIN stated the
compliance nurse was able to communicate with the ADONs if there were any sections of an incident report
that needed completion. The ADMIN revealed that if the care plan was updated appropriately after a
resident fall, then an inaccurate MDS Assessment would not impact the residents care but may impact the
facility's reimbursement for that care.
Residents Affected - Few
Record review of facility policy, Resident Assessment, noted as a section of the Nursing Policy & Procedure
Manual 2003, revealed 7. Each assessment will be conducted or coordinate with the appropriate
participation of health professionals. Each individual who completes a portion of the assessment must sign
and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675638
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3