F 0580
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room,
etc.) that affect the resident.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative(s) when
there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (Resident #1) of three residents
reviewed.
The facility failed to notify the NP immediately when Resident #1 was admitted and they did not have his
prescribed insulin.
This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk of exacerbation of their health conditions and
deterioration of their health.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of stroke, coronary artery disease, and
cholecystitis (inflammation of the gall bladder).
Review of Resident #1's EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected his 5-day MDS assessment had not been completed.
Review of Resident #1's baseline care plan, dated 11/03/24, reflected he had an ADL self-care
performance deficit with an intervention of receiving a therapy evaluations and treatment per physician's
orders.
Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge records, dated 11/02/24, reflected an order for Insulin, 42 units HumuLIN 70/100 units/ML - twice a day.
Review of Resident #1's physician's order, dated 11/02/24, reflected HumuLIN 70/30 Subcutaneous
Suspension (70-30) 100 UNIT/ML - Inject 42 units subcutaneously two times a day for blood sugar.
Review of Resident #1's November 2024 MAR, on 11/04/24, reflected he had not been administered either
dose of insulin on 11/03/24 or his morning dose on 11/04/24.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 4:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 7:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 7
Event ID:
675651
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0580
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/04/24 at 9:03 AM and documented by LVN B, reflected
insulin was not administered due him being a new admission and waiting delivery.
Residents Affected - Few
Review of Resident #1's blood sugar readings in his EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected the following:
11/02/24 9:32 PM - 176.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 7:33 AM - 184.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 1:00 PM - 283.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 4:40 PM - 245.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 8:15 PM - 237.0 mg/dL
11/04/24 8:05 AM - 200.0 mg/dL
11/04/24 12:51 PM - 312.0 mg/dL
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:05 PM, Resident #1 stated he was not sure if he had been getting his
insulin as he was still groggy from his procedure in the hospital. He stated it was hard to know if he felt off
(regarding his sugar levels) due to him having an infection and being in pain. He was asked if it was normal
for his sugar levels to be in the upper 200's. His eyes opened wide and he said, Absolutely not! and that
was very concerning to him.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:11 PM, LVN B stated she noticed Resident #1 did not have insulin to
be administered that morning and had reached out to the pharmacy. She stated she was not sure why no
one had reached out to the pharmacy sooner. She stated that particular dosage of insulin was not in their
e-kit but the pharmacy assured her it would be delivered that day.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:55 PM, Resident #1's NP stated she was not notified about the
insulin until that day (11/04/24). She stated she ideally would have liked to have been notified sooner. She
stated if she had been notified sooner, she would have reinforced to reach to the pharmacy or could have
placed an order for a different type of insulin. She stated a negative outcome of going too long without
insulin could be hyperglycemia or other acute issues.
During a telephone interview on 11/04/24 at 1:05 PM, RN A stated she was the nurse who admitted
Resident #1 on 11/02/24. She stated she was pretty new to the facility and had put his orders in and was
just waiting for the medications to be delivered. She stated she thought it would be a given that they needed
the insulin STAT so she did not think to tell the pharmacy. She stated she kept a close eye on his sugar
levels and they never reached 400 or above .
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 2:09 PM, the DON stated when a resident was being admitted they
would come in with orders, the nurses would put the orders in, and the orders went straight to the
pharmacy. She stated they did have insulin in their e-kit, but not specific insulin Resident #1 had an order
for. She stated she would have expected RN A to contact the on-call NP to notify her. She stated it was not
okay to go without scheduled insulin and they could have given him an alternate.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0580
Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised May of 2007, reflected the following:
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
It is the policy of this facility to prepare, administer, and document medications.
.
Residents Affected - Few
12. Any irregularity in pouring or administering must be reported to the doctor.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a
licensed pharmacist.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that
assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one
(Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medications.
The facility failed to administer three doses of insulin after Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] due to
pending delivery from the pharmacy.
This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk of exacerbation of their health conditions and
deterioration of their health.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of stroke, coronary artery disease, and
cholecystitis (inflammation of the gall bladder).
Review of Resident #1's EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected his 5-day MDS assessment had not been completed.
Review of Resident #1's baseline care plan, dated 11/03/24, reflected he had an ADL self-care
performance deficit with an intervention of receiving a therapy evaluations and treatment per physician's
orders.
Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge records, dated 11/02/24, reflected an order for Insulin, 42 units HumuLIN 70/100 units/ML - twice a day.
Review of Resident #1's physician's order, dated 11/02/24, reflected HumuLIN 70/30 Subcutaneous
Suspension (70-30) 100 UNIT/ML - Inject 42 units subcutaneously two times a day for blood sugar.
Review of Resident #1's November 2024 MAR, on 11/04/24, reflected he had not been administered either
dose of insulin on 11/03/24 or his morning dose on 11/04/24.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 4:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 7:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/04/24 at 9:03 AM and documented by LVN B, reflected
insulin was not administered due him being a new admission and waiting delivery.
Review of Resident #1's blood sugar readings in his EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected the following:
11/02/24 9:32 PM - 176.0 mg/dL
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
11/03/24 7:33 AM - 184.0 mg/dL
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
11/03/24 1:00 PM - 283.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 4:40 PM - 245.0 mg/dL
Residents Affected - Some
11/03/24 8:15 PM - 237.0 mg/dL
11/04/24 8:05 AM - 200.0 mg/dL
11/04/24 12:51 PM - 312.0 mg/dL
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:05 PM, Resident #1 stated he was not sure if he had been getting his
insulin as he was still groggy from his procedure in the hospital. He stated it was hard to know if he felt off
(regarding his sugar levels) due to him having an infection and being in pain. He was asked if it was normal
for his sugar levels to be in the upper 200's. His eyes opened wide and he said, Absolutely not! and that
was very concerning to him.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:11 PM, LVN B stated she noticed Resident #1 did not have insulin to
be administered that morning and had reached out to the pharmacy. She stated she was not sure why no
one had reached out to the pharmacy sooner. She stated that particular dosage of insulin was not in their
e-kit but the pharmacy assured her it would be delivered that day.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:55 PM, Resident #1's NP stated she was not notified about the
insulin until that day (11/04/24). She stated she ideally would have liked to have been notified sooner. She
stated if she had been notified sooner, she would have reinforced to reach to the pharmacy or could have
placed an order for a different type of insulin. She stated a negative outcome of going too long without
insulin could be hyperglycemia or other acute issues.
During a telephone interview on 11/04/24 at 1:05 PM, RN A stated she was the nurse who admitted
Resident #1 on 11/02/24. She stated she was pretty new to the facility and had put his orders in and was
just waiting for the medications to be delivered. She stated she thought it would be a given that they needed
the insulin STAT so she did not think to tell the pharmacy. She stated she kept a close eye on his sugar
levels and they never reached 400 or above .
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 2:09 PM, the DON stated when a resident was being admitted they
would come in with orders, the nurses would put the orders in, and the orders went straight to the
pharmacy. She stated they did have insulin in their e-kit, but not specific insulin Resident #1 had an order
for. She stated she would have expected RN A to contact the on-call NP to notify her. She stated it was not
okay to go without scheduled insulin and they could have given him an alternate.
Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised May of 2007, reflected the following:
It is the policy of this facility to prepare, administer, and document medications.
.
12. Any irregularity in pouring or administering must be reported to the doctor.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant
medications errors for one of one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for significant medication
errors.
Residents Affected - Some
The facility failed to administer three doses of insulin after Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] due to
pending delivery from the pharmacy.
This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk of exacerbation of their health conditions and
deterioration of their health.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of stroke, coronary artery disease, and
cholecystitis (inflammation of the gall bladder).
Review of Resident #1's EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected his 5-day MDS assessment had not been completed.
Review of Resident #1's baseline care plan, dated 11/03/24, reflected he had an ADL self-care
performance deficit with an intervention of receiving a therapy evaluations and treatment per physician's
orders.
Review of Resident #1's hospital discharge records, dated 11/02/24, reflected an order for Insulin, 42 units HumuLIN 70/100 units/ML - twice a day.
Review of Resident #1's physician's order, dated 11/02/24, reflected HumuLIN 70/30 Subcutaneous
Suspension (70-30) 100 UNIT/ML - Inject 42 units subcutaneously two times a day for blood sugar.
Review of Resident #1's November 2024 MAR, on 11/04/24, reflected he had not been administered either
dose of insulin on 11/03/24 or his morning dose on 11/04/24.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 4:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/03/24 at 7:27 PM and documented by RN A, reflected
insulin was not administered due to it not being available.
Review of Resident #1's progress note, dated 11/04/24 at 9:03 AM and documented by LVN B, reflected
insulin was not administered due him being a new admission and waiting delivery.
Review of Resident #1's blood sugar readings in his EMR, on 11/04/24, reflected the following:
11/02/24 9:32 PM - 176.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 7:33 AM - 184.0 mg/dL
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 7
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675651
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
1600 N I H 35
San Marcos, TX 78666
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0760
11/03/24 1:00 PM - 283.0 mg/dL
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
11/03/24 4:40 PM - 245.0 mg/dL
11/03/24 8:15 PM - 237.0 mg/dL
Residents Affected - Some
11/04/24 8:05 AM - 200.0 mg/dL
11/04/24 12:51 PM - 312.0 mg/dL
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:05 PM, Resident #1 stated he was not sure if he had been getting his
insulin as he was still groggy from his procedure in the hospital. He stated it was hard to know if he felt off
(regarding his sugar levels) due to him having an infection and being in pain. He was asked if it was normal
for his sugar levels to be in the upper 200's. His eyes opened wide and he said, Absolutely not! and that
was very concerning to him.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:11 PM, LVN B stated she noticed Resident #1 did not have insulin to
be administered that morning and had reached out to the pharmacy. She stated she was not sure why no
one had reached out to the pharmacy sooner. She stated that particular dosage of insulin was not in their
e-kit but the pharmacy assured her it would be delivered that day.
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:55 PM, Resident #1's NP stated she was not notified about the
insulin until that day (11/04/24). She stated she ideally would have liked to have been notified sooner. She
stated if she had been notified sooner, she would have reinforced to reach to the pharmacy or could have
placed an order for a different type of insulin. She stated a negative outcome of going too long without
insulin could be hyperglycemia or other acute issues.
During a telephone interview on 11/04/24 at 1:05 PM, RN A stated she was the nurse who admitted
Resident #1 on 11/02/24. She stated she was pretty new to the facility and had put his orders in and was
just waiting for the medications to be delivered. She stated she thought it would be a given that they needed
the insulin STAT so she did not think to tell the pharmacy. She stated she kept a close eye on his sugar
levels and they never reached 400 or above .
During an interview on 11/04/24 at 2:09 PM, the DON stated when a resident was being admitted they
would come in with orders, the nurses would put the orders in, and the orders went straight to the
pharmacy. She stated they did have insulin in their e-kit, but not specific insulin Resident #1 had an order
for. She stated she would have expected RN A to contact the on-call NP to notify her. She stated it was not
okay to go without scheduled insulin and they could have given him an alternate.
Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, revised May of 2007, reflected the following:
It is the policy of this facility to prepare, administer, and document medications.
.
12. Any irregularity in pouring or administering must be reported to the doctor.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675651
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 7