Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Village Healthcare and RehabilitationCMS #6756891 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0684 Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. Residents Affected - Few The facility failed to document, monitor, and assess Resident #1's abnormal skin discoloration prior to and upon return of Resident #1's outing (on pass) to her home after RP reported the discoloration to staff. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of delay medical treatment, hospitalization, decline in condition, and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 9/25/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to facility on 9/8/23 with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and Hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of body) following cerebral infraction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, Contracture left knee, contracture left ankle. Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident#1 had a BIMS score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the facility's Sign Out / Sign In Log revealed Resident #1 was signed out of facility by RP on 9/23/23 at 12:45 pm initialed by RN D and Signed in on 9/23/23 at 4:45 pm initialed by LVN T. In an interview on 9/24/23 at 6:07 pm, the RP said he told RN D before taking Resident #1 out on pass to their home, that he noticed bruising on Resident #1's left leg. He said that LVN D looked at the leg and asked if she had any pain and Resident #1 said no. In an interview on 9/24/23 at 5:22 pm RN D stated RP voiced a concern on 9/23/23 at approximately 12:35 pm stating that Resident #1 had discoloration to her leg area. RN D said she assessed the resident and found no cause for concern. She said the resident did not complain of pain. RN D also said she did not document at the time or at that day when it happened and she could not say why. She said she should have documented but did not. She also said she did not relay this information to the oncoming afternoon nurse or the DON. She said she didn't document it at the time because it wasn't any cause of concern. In a follow up interview RN D said the discoloration was Resident #1's baseline (that was her norm). She said she could not remember the exact color so she could not answer what color (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 675689 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675689 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/02/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation 615 N Ware Rd McAllen, TX 78501 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684 it was. RN D also said that she could not remember if she assessed range of motion. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm In an interview on 9/24/23 at 5:05 pm with LVN T stated he conducted an assessment on Resident #1 when she returned to the facility on 9/23/23 at approximately 4:45 pm. He said he found no bruising, no complaints of pain were expressed by either Resident #1 or RP. He said he was later informed, at approximately 7:30 pm by RP that Resident #1 had complained of pain to her left leg. LVN T assessed Resident#1 and notified MD and ordered x-rays. Follow up interviews on 9/29/23 LVN T revealed he did not conduct a full head to toe assessment of the injured area as the resident had socks on and they were not removed LVN T said after Resident#1's return from her outing, he assessed her head to toe. However, he did not assess or look at her leg or foot because she had socks on and he did not want to intrude on her. Residents Affected - Few Record review of Resident#1's Radiology Interpretation dated 9/23/23 at 11:18 p.m. found R#1 findings; Spiral angulated fractures of the distal tibial and fibular shafts. Generalized osteoporosis. Record review on 9/23/23 of Resident #1's progress notes revealed no progress noted on assessment done on R#1 at the time of the assessment. Record review on 9/23/23 of Resident #1's assessments revealedno assessment, or change of condition done by RN D prior to R#1's outing. In an interview on 9/26/23 at 11:48 am, the DON stated that RN D was supposed to document a concern but she got very busy with a patient, so she forgot to. She has to do a late entry, just a progress note. DON said if RN D documents what she did in progress notes, that is sufficient. She also said RN D did not let her know of the concern. DON said that Record review of facilities policy titled Significant Change in Condition, Response original date 5.2007, Revision/Review Date(s): 06.2019, 1.2022 states; Policy It is the policy of this facility to ensure each resident receives quality of care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the interdisciplinary comprehensive assessment and plan of care. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675689 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0684GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F684 - Quality of care

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 2, 2023 survey of Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation?

This was a inspection survey of Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation on October 2, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation on October 2, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.