F 0637
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment within 14
days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in
the resident's physical or mental condition a significant change of condition for 1 of 14 residents reviewed
for assessments. (Resident #25)
Residents Affected - Few
The facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS for Resident #25 within 14 days after the resident
was admitted to hospice services.
This failure could place residents who experienced a significant change in their condition requiring an MDS
assessment at risk of not receiving needed services.
Findings Included:
Record review of a face sheet dated 07/15/24 indicated Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old-male with a
readmission date of 06/20/24 and an admission date of 09/15/22. Resident #25 was admitted with
diagnoses including atherosclerosis (a buildup of fats and other substances in and on the artery walls) and
heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should).
Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #25's BIMS was 12 out of
15 indicating cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment indicated Resident #25 had a diagnosis
of heart failure.
Record review of a care plan initiated on 06/28/24 indicated Resident #25 had chosen to have hospice care
for heart failure.
Record review of physician orders indicated an order on 06/28/24 indicated Resident #25 was admitted to
hospice services with a diagnosis of heart failure.
Record review of the electronic medical record on 07/16/24 indicated Resident #25's MDS section had a
significant change MDS with an ARD of 7/5/24 in progress but not completed.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 1:50 p.m., the MDS Nurse said she was responsible for all MDS in the
facility. She said the Corporate MDS Coordinator was her back-up. She said she was educated on MDS
completion and timing of significant change MDS. The MDS Nurse said Resident #25 was admitted to
hospice services on 06/28/24 and she should have completed the significant change MDS by 07/11/24.
She said she opened the MDS in the computer system but was unable to complete the MDS timely due to
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
675695
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0637
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
being part time and only working 3 days a week at the facility. She said at times she was unable to stay
caught up, especially during the middle of the month when there were a lot of admissions. The MDS nurse
said the possible negative outcome was an incorrect care plan. She said she completed the comprehensive
triggered care plans.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 2:10 p.m., the DON said the MDS Nurse was responsible for all MDS at
the facility. She said the MDS nurse was educated on completion and timeliness of MDS. The DON said
Resident #25's significant change MDS was not completed timely due to being possibly overlooked. She
said there was no negative outcome, the care plan was updated but policy was not followed. The DON said
her expectation was all MDS completed accurately and timely.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 2:15 p.m., the Regional Nurse said the facility follows the RAI (Resident
Assessment Instrument) for a MDS policy.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 2:20 p.m., the Administrator said the MDS nurse was responsible for all
MDS in the facility. She said the Corporate MDS nurse was a double check and audited some MDS
assessments. The Administrator said the possible negative outcome was not following facility policy. The
administrator said her expectation was all MDS completed accurately and timely.
Attempted phone interview on 07/16/24 at 3:00 p.m., with the Corporate MDS Coordinator was not
successful.
Record review of the, Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated,
October 2023, indicated, . Chapter 2 . An SCSA {significant change in status assessment} is required to be
performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed
hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The ARD
{assessment reference date} must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which
can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). An SCSA
must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on the resident. This is to
ensure a coordinated plan of care between the hospice and nursing home is in place. The MDS completion
date (item Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days from the ARD (ARD + 14 calendar days) and no later
than 14 days after the determination that the criteria for an SCSA were met.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and
care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan,
and the residents' choices for 1 of 14 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #85)
Residents Affected - Few
The facility did not assess or obtain orders for a post-surgical incision to Resident #85's left hip.
This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest
practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Findings included:
Record review of physician orders dated July 2024 indicated Resident #85, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE]
year-old female with a diagnosis of displaced intertrochanteric closed fracture of the left femur (fracture of
the hip that is made up of the thigh bone and the pelvis [socket]. The orders did not indicate the resident
had orders to treat the left hip incision.
Record review of the clinical record dated 07/14/24 indicated the admission MDS was in progress and had
not been completed.
Record review of the baseline care plan dated 07/14/24 indicated Resident #85 had potential/actual
impairment to skin integrity. Focus: The resident has potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Observe
and identify any new affected skin area, intervene with treatment as necessary and notify MD. Does the
resident have a surgical site? . Yes . Goal: The resident's surgical site will show signs of healing and/or
remain free from infection by/through review date. Intervention: Documentation to include measurement of
each area of skin impairment: width, length, depth, type of tissue, exudate, and any other notable changes
upon observations. Intervention: Follow-up with surgeon per physician order. Treatment of surgical site to be
provided per physician order. Monitor for s/s of infection, change in appearance, or increased
pain/discomfort, intervene and notify surgeon/MD upon significant change.
Record review of a hospital emergency room record dated 07/03/24 indicated Resident #85 had a fall from
the bed at home, was in pain to the left hip area and had a CT scan (a computer imaging test which can
diagnose life threatening conditions) performed. The CT scan dated 07/10/24 indicated the resident had an
acute impact fracture of the left intertrochanteric femur with minimal displacement. The Discharge summary
dated [DATE] indicated Resident #85 had an open reduction and internal fixation repair (a surgical
procedure that treats severe fractures and dislocations) of the left hip. The instructions indicated to contact
your health care provider if: . you have more redness, swelling or pain at the incision area, if you have more
fluid or blood coming from your incision or leaking through the dressing, you notice your incision feels warm
to the touch, you have pus or a bad odor coming from the incision. There were no wound care instructions
noted.
Record review of an admission assessment dated [DATE] at 2:46 p.m., indicated Resident #85 had a
surgical dressing to the left trochanter. There was no documentation of the incision site.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 10:16 a.m., the ADON/treatment nurse said she was responsible
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
for making sure Resident #85's wound was assessed. She said she should have assessed the wound and
obtained an order for the wound care yesterday on 07/15/24 and she did not. She said she did not have
orders for the left hip dressing to be changed. She said the possible negative outcome of not assessing the
incision site is that it could be infected, or the edges could possibly not be approximated.
During interview and record review on 07/16/24 at 1:36 p.m., the ADON/treatment nurse said the wound
specialist NP came in today 07/16/24 and looked at Resident #85's incision and gave orders for treatment.
She provided an order for Resident #85 dated 07/16/24 that read: cleanse surgical incision with dermal
wound cleanser, pat dry, apply cut to fit adaptic gauze (a gauze designed to protect regenerating tissue),
apply a non-adherent dressing and cover with tegaderm dressing (a transparent self-adhesive dressing),
change today and then on 7/22/24. The ADON/treatment nurse said she was unable to get the surgeon to
return her call. She said the wound specialist NP who was in the same group as the orthopedic surgeon,
was familiar with the post orthopedic surgery protocol.
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 12:53 p.m., the DON said her expectation was for newly admitted
residents to have orders from the hospital where they were coming from and if not, the physician should be
notified to receive orders. She said Resident #85's incision should have been assessed and the physician
called for orders. She said the possible negative outcome would be the site could possibly get infected or
the resident would not receive treatment in a timely manner.
During observations on 07/16/24 at 1:46 p.m., Resident #85's surgical dressing to the left hip was not dated
or initialed. The ADON/treatment nurse removed the dressing to the incision. The incision was clean, dry,
without signs of infection and the edges were approximated. She performed wound care without concerns
noted.
During an interview on 07/17/24 at 12:14 p.m., LVN A said she was working Sunday 07/14/24, when
Resident #85 was admitted . She said it was her responsibility to assess the newly admitted residents from
head to toe and make sure she had orders for Resident #85's incision. She said she did not take Resident
#85's dressing off and she did not call the doctor for orders related to care of the incision. She said she
should have assessed the incision and called the doctor. She said when the resident was admitted she was
resisting care, and she did not take the dressing off. She said the possible negative outcome would be the
incision could be infected or the sutures might not have been intact.
Record review of a Provision of Quality of Care policy with a copyright date of 2023 indicated: Based on
comprehensive assessments, the facility will ensure that residents receive treatment and care by qualified
persons in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care
plans, and the residents' choices. 1. Each resident will be provided care and services to attain or maintain
his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 4. Qualified persons will provide
the care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and
the resident's choices.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a
licensed pharmacist.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including
procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and
biologicals) for 4 of 14 residents (Residents #10, #20, #21, and #24) and failed to establish a system of
records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate
reconciliation and drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for
1 of 14 residents (Resident #10) to meet the needs of each resident for reviewed for pharmacy services.
LVN A did not prepare medications for Resident #21 per the facility policy.
RN D did not flush Resident #10's gastric tube (tube surgically inserted through the wall of the abdomen
directly into the stomach) per gravity and did not destroy the used fentanyl (scheduled II controlled
medication used for severe pain) patches in a sharps container per policy and with a witness for
destruction.
LVN A did not prepare medications for Resident #20 and Resident #24 per the facility policy.
These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed
medications and at risk of drug diversion.
Findings included:
1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 06/10/24, indicated the resident was admitted to the
facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, diabetes, and post-surgical repair of
fractured hip.
Record review of Resident #21's admission MDS indicated it was in process and had not been completed
due to required timeframe.
Record review of Resident #21's care plan, dated 06/13/24, indicated the resident had impaired cognitive
function related to short term memory loss.
During an observation and interview on 07/15/24 at 8:25 a.m., Resident #21 was eating breakfast in her
room. A plastic medicine cup was observed next to the resident's breakfast tray containing 8 unidentifiable
pills. Resident #21 said the staff gave her the medication daily before breakfast and she took them after she
ate her meal. She said staff did not return to ensure the medications were consumed.
During an observation and interview on 07/15/24 at 8:35 a.m., LVN A said she only left Resident #21's
morning medications with the resident during medication pass. She said Resident #21 preferred to have
morning medications available to take after the morning meal. LVN A said she had been trained in safe
medication administration and knew medication was not left at bedside. She said she had been trained to
prepare medications and to observe residents consuming medications to ensure all were taken. She said
potential negative outcomes of leaving the medications at a resident's bedside unsupervised, would be not
knowing if the resident swallowed the medication or not, medications could be
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
dropped, lost, or not taken. She said she always came back to check to see if the medications were taken.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 07/17/24 at 10:45 a.m., the DON said her expectations were for nursing staff to
never leave resident medications at their bedside. She said nurses should always stay with residents to
ensure medications were taken. The DON said potential negative outcomes included resident not taking
medications, not swallowing all medications, or even a resident with wandering behaviors could go into
room and take medications that did not belong to them.
Residents Affected - Some
During an interview on 07/17/24 at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator said her expectations of staff included
medications should not be left at any resident's bedside and should always be administered by licensed
personnel while in attendance with the resident. She expected licensed nursing staff to abide by facility
policies. She said staff were trained in medication administration policy and procedures.
2. Record review of the admission record dated 07/16/24 indicated Resident #10 was female [AGE] years
old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, and pain.
Record review of the physician's orders dated 07/16/24 indicated Resident #10 was to receive a fentanyl
transdermal patch 72 Hour (75 MCG/HR) Apply 1 patch transdermal every 72 HRS related to pain,
unspecified and remove per schedule with start a date of 12/15/2023. The orders included dilute each
medication with 5-10 cc of water and flush with 30 cc of water before and after medications with start date
of 04/03/24.
Record review quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10 was severely impaired with
cognition with BIMS of 00. A nutritional approach indicated feeding tube during last 7 days while she was a
resident. The pain management section indicated she received routine pain medication.
Record review of the care plan revision dated 10/20/23 indicated Resident #10 had chronic pain and
received fentanyl 75MCG/HR patch Q 72 HRS.
Record review of the MAR dated July 2024 indicated Resident #10's fentanyl patch was applied 07/07/24
and removed on 07/10/24 and the patch was applied on 07/10/24 and removed on 07/13/24.
Record review of the count sheet for Resident #10 dated 06/26/24 indicated no witnesses on 07/07/24,
07/10/24, and 07/13/24 for the disposal of the fentanyl patch.
During an observation and interview on 7/16/24 at 9:23 a.m., RN D went to apply Resident #10's fentanyl
patch and RN D removed an old patch dated 7/13/24 on left arm. She reached over to apply a new patch
on the r arm and there were 2 more fentanyl patches dated 7/7/24 and 7/10/24 on the resident right arm.
RN D removed both patches and placed all 3 used fentanyl patches in the sharp's container without a
witness. She looked on the residents back for any more patches, reviewed her v/s and applied the new
patch dated 7/16/24. She said if the used patches were not removed the resident could receive too much
fentanyl and could be over medicated. She said the resident should have only had one patch on as
ordered.
During an observation and interview on 07/16/24 at 9:30 a.m., RN D checked placement with aspiration
and auscultation and said the tube was in place, then flushed the gastric tube for Resident #10 with 30 cc
of water per syringe not to gravity. RN D gave each medication mixed with 5-10 cc water per
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
gravity then flushed with 30 cc of water per syringe not by gravity.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 9:35 a.m., RN D said she thought the water flushes were to be pushed
like an IV flush and had not been trained any differently here and works as needed here.
Residents Affected - Some
During an interview on 07/16/24 at 9:45 a.m., the DON said the fentanyl patch should be removed every 3
days before the new patch was applied and if a resident had multiple patches could receive more than what
was ordered. She said the medications and water flush was to be given by gravity for all residents with
gastric tubes per our policy.
During an interview on 7/16/24 2:30 p.m., LVN E said she had forgotten to remove Resident #10's fentanyl
patch on 07/10/24 and 07/13/24. She said she initialed she had removed the patch, but she got busy and
forgot to remove it and she was responsible. She said if the resident had multiple patches the resident
might receive the wrong dose of medications.
Record review of the undated policy titled flushing a feeding Tube indicated it is the policy of this facility to
ensure that staff providing care and services to the resident via a feeding tube are aware of, competent in
and utilize facility protocol regarding feeding nutrition and care.
Record review of the Narcotic Pain Patch policy dated February 2023 indicated It is the policy of this facility
to maintain records of all narcotic patches at the time of receiving in the facility until destruction.10. Upon
placement of the new patch, the used patch will be disposed by folding the patch in half with sticky sides
together and flush down the sink or toilet or disposed of via a DEA-compliant drug disposal system and
verified by the nurse removing and the nurse verifying discard of the patch.
3. Record review of the admission record dated 07/16/24 indicated Resident #20 was male [AGE] years old
and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkison's disease (disorder which affects movement) and
high blood pressure.
Record review of the physician orders dated 07/16/24 indicate Resident #20's orders included buspirone
(used for anxiety) 5 mg three times a day, and Carbidopa-Levodopa ( used for Parkinson's disease) 25-100
MG give 2 tablets twice daily, and colace (used for constipation) 100 MG daily, Lasix (used for edema) 20
MG daily.
Record review of the admission record dated 07/16/24 indicated Resident #24 was male [AGE] years old
and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of high blood pressure and heart disease.
Record review of the physician orders dated 07/16/24 indicate Resident #24's orders included amlodipine
tablet (used for high blood pressure 10 MG, Coreg Oral Tablet 12.5 MG (used for high blood pressure,
Gabapentin (used for nerve pain)100 MG three times a day, and Sertraline (used for depression) 100 MG
daily.
During an observation and interview on 07/15/24 at 8:46 a.m., LVN A was administering medications to
residents who resided on the 200 hall. She was standing in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and said, I still
have both of these residents to give medications but cannot give with you because I prepared them earlier.
She said she knew the policy was not to set up medications ahead of time. She said she was to assess the
resident vital signs then prepare medications and then give medications to prevent medication errors or
having to dispose of medications.
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675695
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
07/17/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
College Street Health Care Center
4150 College St
Beaumont, TX 77707
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0755
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
During an interview on 07/15/24 at 11:00 a.m., the DON said medications should not be set up ahead of
time because the assessment and vital signs should be done before medications were prepared. She said
medications were to be prepared at the door of the resident's room or by the resident. She said this was to
prevent medication errors or prevent medications from having to be wasted if not needed.
Record review of the undated Medication Administration indicated Policy: Medications are administered by
licensed nurse, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician
and in accordance with professional standards of practice . 8. Obtain and record vital signs . 10. Ensure that
the six rights of medication are followed .11.Review MAR to identify medication to administered. 16.
Observe resident consumption of medication.18 Sign MAR after administered. For those medications
requiring vital signs, record the vital signs onto the MAR.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675695
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8