F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed and
implemented within a timely manner for each resident consistent with resident rights to include measurable
objectives and timeframes to meet residents medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in
the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility
failed to add the fall with significant injury, fall mats, and the surgical wound with wound care to Resident
#1's care plan. The facility also failed to complete Resident #1's comprehensive care plan within the
specified time frame.These failures could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate care and services.
Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/10/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old
female with an initial admission date of 08/18/2025 and a current admission date of 09/09/2025. Pertinent
diagnoses included Displaced Oblique Fracture of Shaft of Right Femur (a traumatic injury in which the
femur breaks diagonally), Orthopedic Aftercare (post-surgical care to aide in recovery), History of Falling,
Muscle Weakness, and Unspecified Lack of Coordination.Record review of Resident #1's physician orders
revealed an order with a start date of 08/18/2025 for wound care to surgical wound to right femur.Record
review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], and signed as completed on
08/25/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 03, which revealed severely impaired cognition. The MDS
assessment also revealed Resident #1 had a major orthopedic surgical procedure during the prior inpatient
hospital stay which required active care during the SNF stay, and Resident #1 had a surgical wound
requiring surgical wound care. The MDS assessment also revealed Resident #1 had a fracture related fall in
the 6 months prior to admission/entry or reentry. Record review of Resident #1's care plan initiated
08/18/2025 and revised on 09/09/2025 revealed a care plan for risk of falls with interventions to include:
keep call light within reach, prompt response to all requests for assistance, encourage appropriate
footwear, medication review, OT and PT evaluation, and place bed in low position. There was not a care
plan which addressed specifically the fall with major injury, or the surgical wound with wound care. There
were also no interventions to address the fall mats in place. In an observation on 09/10/2025 at 9:25 AM
Resident #1's bed was observed low to the floor with fall mats on both sides of the bed, and the call light
within reach. In an interview on 09/10/2025 at 8:25 AM the Administrator stated Resident #1 typically
resided in an ALF, but Resident #1 was admitted to the skilled unit for therapy and care after the fall which
caused the fracture requiring surgical intervention. The Administrator stated the MDS nurse was the one
who updated and revised the care plan, and she had 21 days from admission to complete it. In an interview
on 09/10/2025 at 1:30 PM the MDS nurse stated she was not sure why the fall with major injury or the
surgical wound requiring wound care was not on the care plan, but it should have been since it was the
reason Resident #1 was admitted . She stated maybe it had not been added yet since the comprehensive
care plan was still a work in progress as they have
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675773
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675773
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
09/10/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Brookdale Trinity Towers
317 N Carancahua
Corpus Christi, TX 78401
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
21 days from admission to complete it. The MDS nurse stated there was a care plan for skin integrity, but
she agreed it was for Resident #1's skin breakdown to her buttocks since one of the interventions was to
apply a barrier cream. She stated there should have been one specifically for the surgical wound requiring
wound care. The MDS nurse stated the care plan was a clinical tool used by staff to determine how to
address the residents wants, needs, and care. The MDS nurse reiterated and clarified she had 21 days
from admission or 14 days from the date of the comprehensive assessment to finish the comprehensive
care plan, then after looking it up, she stated she was wrong, and it was 7 days from the date the
comprehensive assessment was completed. She stated Resident #1's comprehensive assessment was
completed on 08/25/2025, so her comprehensive care plan should have been completed by 09/01/2025,
and Resident #1's still was not completed because she was still adding interventions, such as bed in low
position (added 09/09/2025) and fall mats (added 09/10/2025).In an interview on 09/10/2025 at 3:05 PM
the DON stated Resident #1 was admitted to the skilled unit for therapy and post-surgical care after a fall
which caused a fracture requiring surgical intervention. She also stated she was not sure why the surgical
wound requiring wound care was not on the care plan, but it should have been since it was the reason
Resident #1 was admitted . The DON stated some things, such as the floor mats, had not been addressed
on the care plan because she was under the impression the facility had 21 days from admission, regardless
of when the comprehensive assessment had been completed. Record review of the facility's
Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, dated November 2017, revealed A comprehensive, person-centered care
plan will be developed for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the
resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that have been identified through a
comprehensive assessment. 1. The Comprehensive Care Plan will describe treatments and services to
assist the resident to attain or maintain the highest level of physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing. 2.
The comprehensive care plan is based on a comprehensive assessment which includes, but is not limited
to, the MDS, Care Area Assessments, clinical assessments and data collection form, therapy evaluations,
psychosocial and cognitive evaluations, physician assessments/consults.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675773
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2