F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered
care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for
care plans,
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's code status was properly care planned.
This failure could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a
decreased quality of life.
1. Record review of the face sheet dated 1/30/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male
re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's, heart failure, and
hypertension (elevated blood pressure).
Record review of the physician orders dated 1/30/25 for physician orders active as of 1/3/25 indicated
Resident #1 had an order for Code Status: DNR starting 6/4/24.
Record review of an Out-Of-Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate Order dated 6/4/24 indicated Resident #1 DNR
was effective 6/4/24.
Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 Resident #1 was understood by others and
understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 05 and was severely cognitively
impaired.
Record review of the care plan last revised on 11/20/24 indicated Resident #1 wished to be a full code.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 1:12 p.m. the DON said the facility uses the RAI Manual for care plans.
The DON said the facility did not have a care plan policy.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 2:29 p.m. LVN A said the way she would look up a resident's code status
was to go into the EMR in the resident's profile and under the resident's picture code status can be seen.
LVN A said she did not know if the physician orders or care plan prompted the code status in the EMR.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 2: 39 p.m. MDS Coordinator B said the MDS Coordinators handled the
care plans and ensured they were correct. MDS Coordinator B said the MDS Coordinators were
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675774
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675774
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/30/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Legend Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Greenville
2300 Jack Finney Blvd
Greenville, TX 75402
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
responsible for ensuring the care plan was correct and was checked 7 days after completing an MDS. MDS
Coordinator B said the computer system populated a care plan review. MDS Coordinator B said the MDS,
and care plan code status should be the same. MDS Coordinator B said the orders populate the code
status on the resident's profile under their picture. MDS Coordinator B said the importance of the orders
and care plan code status matching was because the care plan represented the kind of care the facility was
giving.
During an interview on 1/30/25 at 2:46 p.m. the DON said the MDS Coordinators were responsible for
ensuring the care plans were accurate. The DON said she expected the orders and the care plan to match
including a resident's code status. The DON said the importance of ensuring the code status on the care
plan and orders matched was for accuracy.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675774
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2