F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or
her rights.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive
services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for five (Resident
#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) of fifteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility
failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1, #2. #3, #4, and #5's rooms was in a position that was
accessible to the residents on 08/12/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to
obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #1
Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 10/09/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted
to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness, hemiplegia (paralysis of one
side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #1's
Quarterly MDS Assessment (assessment used to determine functional capabilities and health needs),
dated 09/01/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment (the resident required significant
assistance and support in daily life) in cognition with a BIMS (screening tool used to assess cognitive
status) score of 05. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the resident required maximal
assistance for dressing, bed mobility, and transfer. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care
Plan, dated 09/23/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls and one of the interventions was to be
sure the resident's call light was within reach. During an observation and interview on 10/09/2025 at 9:32
AM revealed Resident #1 was in her bed, awake. It was observed that the resident's call light was on the
resident's side table and was not within reach. When asked where her call light was, the resident looked at
her side and said she could not find her call light. Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated
10/09/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed
with muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated
07/14/2025, reflected the resident was cognitively intact (resident capable of normal cognition and needs
little support) with a BIMS score of 13. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the resident required
moderate assistance for dressing, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of Resident #9's Comprehensive Care
Plan, dated 09/10/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls and one of the interventions was to be
sure the resident's call light was within reach. During an observation and interview on 10/09/2025 at 9:36
AM revealed Resident #2 was in his wheelchair, awake. It was observed that the resident's call light was on
the floor behind his side table. He said the call light was behind his side table for some time. Resident #3
Review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 10/09/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the
facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Review of
Resident #3's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 08/14/2025, reflected the resident had severe impairment
in cognition with a BIMS score of 03. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the resident required
moderate assistance for dressing, bed
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
675783
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675783
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Villa at Mountain View
2918 Duncanville Rd
Dallas, TX 75211
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
mobility, and transfer. Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 09/30/2025, reflected the
resident was at risk for falls and one of the interventions was to be sure the resident's call light was within
reach. An observation on 10/09/2025 at 9:39 AM revealed Resident #23 was in his bed with eyes closed. It
was observed that the resident's call light was on the floor under his bed. Resident #4 Review of Resident
#4's Face Sheet, dated 10/09/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE].
The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and muscle wasting. Review of Resident #4's Quarterly
MDS Assessment, dated 09/26/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview to
determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the resident required maximal
assistance for dressing, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan,
dated 09/23/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls and one of the interventions was to be sure the
resident's call light was within reach. During an observation and an attempted interview on 10/09/2025 at
9:43 AM revealed Resident #4 was in her bed, awake. It was observed that the resident's call light was on
the floor. When asked where her call light was, the resident did not answer. Resident #5 Review of Resident
#5's Face Sheet, dated 10/09/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE].
The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait. Review of Resident #5's
Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 09/01/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete the interview
to determine the BIMS score. The Quarterly MDS Assessment indicated that the resident required
supervision for dressing, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan,
dated 09/24/2025, reflected the resident was at risk for falls and one of the interventions was to be sure the
resident's call light was within reach. During an observation and an attempted interview on 10/09/2025 at
9:47 AM revealed Resident #5 was sitting at the side of her in her bed. It was observed that the resident's
call light was on the floor under a walker. When asked where her call light was, the resident did not reply.
During an observation and interview on 10/09/2025 at 9:57 AM, CNA C stated the call lights should be with
the residents at all times because the call lights were used by the residents to call the staff if they needed
something or if they needed help. She said without the call lights, the residents might fall if they tried to do
things by themselves or might get mad because they cannot get hold of anybody. She said the call lights
were for all the residents, whether independent or dependent residents. She went inside Resident's #1's
room, took the call light from her side table, and placed it where Resident #1 could reach it. She then went
to Resident #2's room and pulled his call light from behind the resident's side table and placed it where the
resident could reach it. She then went to Resident #3's room and took the call light from the floor. She also
did the same for Resident #4 and Resident #5. She said she went to the residents' rooms to change them
but did not made sure that the call lights were with residents when she left their rooms. She said she would
a round on her assigned hall to check the call lights. In an interview on 10/09/2025 at 10:31 AM, LVN B
stated call lights should be with the residents in case they needed to call the staff because they needed to
be changed, needed pain medications, or needed a refill of water. She said the CNAs and herself were
responsible in making sure the call lights were with the residents. She said she did not notice the call lights
were not with the residents when she checked on them. In an interview on 10/09/2025 at 11:19 AM, ADON
A stated call lights should be with the residents at all times because the call lights were their lifeline. He
said the residents used the call lights to call the staff if they were in distress or just needed a refill of water.
He said the call lights were for independent or dependent residents. He said an independent resident might
be having a heart attack and no one would know because the call light was not within reach. He said all the
staff were responsible in checking if
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675783
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675783
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/24/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Villa at Mountain View
2918 Duncanville Rd
Dallas, TX 75211
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
the call lights were with the residents and the expectation was for the staff to make sure the call lights were
with the residents every time they left the rooms. He said an in-service had been going around and that he
would coordinate with the DON to randomly check if the call lights were with the residents. In an interview
on 10/09/2025 at 11:28 AM, the DON stated the expectation was for the staff to make sure the call lights
were with the residents at all times. She said the call lights were used by the residents to call the staff if
they needed something. She said residents might try to go to the bathroom by themselves because she
had no way to call the staff that might result to a fall and injuries. She said all the staff were responsible for
the call lights, including her. The DON said an in-service was already initiated and she would monitor the
staffs' compliance about call lights. In an interview on 10/09/2025 at 11:48 AM, the Administrator stated the
staff should make sure the call lights were with the residents before they leave the room. She said, for some
residents, the call light was their sense of protection that if something happened to them, they would be
able to call the staff for help. She said without the call light the residents might feel helpless. She said
everybody was responsible in making sure the call lights were with the residents, whether the resident was
independent or not. She said the DON already started an in-service about call lights. Record review of the
facility's In-Service Training Report, dated 10/09/2025, reflected Call lights should be always be withing
residents' reach/ability to push button/activate call light. Use clip for positioning. Everyone has the
ability/responsibility to pick up call light and make sure it is in residents reach at all times. Record review of
the facility's policy entitled Answering the Call Light 2001 MED-PASS, Inc. revised October 2010 reflected
Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs . General
Guideline . 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of
the resident.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675783
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3