F 0686
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers
receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote
healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of three residents
reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Residents Affected - Few
1. The facility failed to ensure there were PRN wound care orders for Resident #1's Stage 4 sacral pressure
ulcer per professional standards of care.
2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's dressing was replaced when it became dislodged, allowing the
wound to become contaminated with feces.
This failure could place residents at risk of developing infections to wounds.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacrum.
Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected his BIMS score was not calculated
due to his medical condition. His Functional Status assessment indicated he required total assistance from
staff for all of his ADLs. His Skin Conditions did not reflect any pressure ulcers.
Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 09/27/24, indicated he had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to his
coccyx that was being treated by the wound care physician.
Record review of Resident #1's physicians orders reflected an order, dated 11/19/24, which reflected:
Wound Treatment Order: Location: (sacrum and right buttock) Clean with Normal Saline/Wound Cleanser.
Apply:(Dilute 1/4 of Dakins solution onto kerlix). Cover with Primary Dressing:(optiform/bordered dressing).
Once A Day 06:00 AM - 06:00 PM
Observation on 11/23/24 at 11:00 AM of Resident #1 revealed he was on his back in bed, tracheostomy in
place, feeding tube in place with feeding infusing, and a urinary catheter draining amber colored urine. The
resident was not responsive to verbal stimulation.
Observation and interview on 11/23/24 at 11:40 AM with LVN A revealed Resident #1's pressure ulcer
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675792
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675792
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/23/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Avir at Mansfield
1402 E Broad St
Mansfield, TX 76063
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0686
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
did not have dressing in place. The dressing was not present in the resident's brief, and the pressure ulcer
was covered with loose bowel movement. LVN A stated she did not know when the dressing had come off.
She stated this was her first assessment of the resident this shift.
Observation and interview on 11/23/24 at 12:00 PM with the ADON revealed she agreed the dressing for
Resident #1's pressure ulcer was not present in the resident's brief. The ADON stated if the dressing had
been removed while providing care because it was soiled or dislodged. She stated the nurse should have
been notified immediately, so the dressing could be replaced.
Interview on 11/23/24 at 12:05 PM with CNA B revealed she had changed Resident #1's brief, with CNA C
assisting, between 7:30 AM and 8:00 AM. CNA B stated the dressing was in place at that time. CNA B
stated the resident's brief was only wet, not soiled when she changed it. When CNA B was asked if she had
reported the wetness to the nurse, since the resident had a urinary catheter, she stated she did not notify
LVN A. She stated LVN A had been assisting her with Resident #1.
Interview on 11/23/24 at 12:15 PM with CNA C revealed he had not helped CNA B change Resident #1.
Follow-up interview on 11/23/24 at 12:18 PM with LVN A revealed she had not assisted CNA B with
changing Resident #1.
Observation on 11/23/24 at 12:24 PM with LVN A revealed Resident #1's pressure ulcer had been cleansed
of bowel movement. The resident's skin did not appear red or irritated, and the wound measured 10 cm x
15 cm x 4.5 cm. LVN A provided Resident #1 with wound care per the physician order.
Telephone interview on 11/23/24 at 1:40 PM with the Wound Care Nurse revealed Resident #1 had
returned to the facility from an LTAC facility in September 2024. The Wound Care Nurse stated he had gone
to the LTAC after having his tracheostomy placed, with the wound to his coccyx. Prior to his hospital
admission and treatment at the LTAC, Resident #1 had no wounds. The Wound Care Nurse stated the
Wound Physician thought the wound was healing slowly due to the resident's medical conditions. The
Wound Care Nurse stated the nurses knew they were responsible for wound care when she was not
present in the facility, and they knew to follow the physician's order for the procedure.
Record review of the facility's Wound Care policy, dated June 2022, reflected the policy did not address
what to do when the dressing had been dislodged or if the wound had been contaminated with bodily fluids.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675792
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2