F 0558
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to receive
services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 5 (Residents
#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) of 30 residents observed for accommodation of needs.
Residents Affected - Some
The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 had call lights within reach.
This failure could place the residents at risk of not being able to request assistance when needed.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who
had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, depression and
anxiety.
Review of Resident #1's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 4, indicating severe
cognitive impairment. His Functional Status revealed he required limited assistance with his ADLs.
Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 08/30/23, revealed he had an ADL deficit related to impaired
cognition.
Review of Resident #2's undated admission Record revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, depression, anxiety, and cognitive
communication deficit.
Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 1, indicating severe
cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status revealed she required limited assistance with her ADLs.
Review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 09/13/23, revealed she was dependent on staff for activities and
interactions.
Review of Resident #3's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, bipolar disorder, and
contractures.
Review of Resident #3's yearly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score not calculated. Her Functional
Status indicated she required extensive assistance with her ADLs.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675817
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675817
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
10/28/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
FT Worth Southwest Nursing Center
5300 Alta Mesa Blvd
Fort Worth, TX 76133
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Review of Resident #3's care plan, dated 08/23/23, revealed she was dependent on staff for activities and
social interactions. She has communication problems related to dementia.
Review of Resident #4's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Stroke, Parkinson's and muscle weakness.
Residents Affected - Some
Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score not calculated, His
Functional Status indicated he required limited assistance with his ADLs.
Review of Resident #4's care plan, dated 09/13/23, revealed he had behavioral problems but he enjoyed
playing games and socialization.
Review of Resident #5's undated admission Record revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male
admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle wasting, Parkinson's, dementia, and
stroke.
Review of Resident #5's yearly MDS, dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 1 indicating severe cognitive
impairment. His Functional Status indicated he required limited assistance wit his ADLs.
Review of Resident #5's care plan, dated 10/04/23, revealed he had sexually inappropriate behaviors, likes
large social groups, and smoking.
Interview and observation on 10/28/23 at 8:20 AM Resident #1 stated his call light was not where he could
find it. Resident #1 stated that when staff get tired of answering the call light they would take it away and
put it where it could not be reached. Resident #1's call light was curled up in his bedside drawer.
Observations on 10/28/23 from 8:20 AM - 9:00 AM of the 30 residents on 300 Hall revealed a total of five
residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) with call lights out of reach. Call lights were located on the floor at
the foot of the bed, between the bed and the wall, behind dressers, and at the foot of the bed.
Interview on 10/28/23 at 10:15 AM, the DON stated call lights were required to be placed easy reach of the
resident, even if the resident was believed incapable of using the call light. The DON stated family and other
staff needed to be able to easily call for help if they were in the room.
Review of the facility's Communication-Call System policy, revised October 2022, reflected:
.I. The Facility will provide a call system to enable residents to alert the nursing staff from their beds and
toileting/bathing facilities.
II. If a resident is physically incapable of actuating a call system, the resident shall be physically housed in a
resident room close enough to the nursing station to allow for line-of-sight supervision at a frequency
identified by a thorough individualized nursing assessment
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675817
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2