Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Kerens Care CenterCMS #6758671 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency, 1 of them serious (actual harm or immediate jeopardy). The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

675867 11/21/2025 Kerens Care Center 809 NE 4th St Kerens, TX 75144
F 0678 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety Residents Affected - Few Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provided basic life support, which included CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to relative physician orders and the Resident's advanced directives for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. RN A failed to initiate life-saving measures (CPR) when Resident #1, who had a code status of full code was found unresponsive and expired. This failure could place residents at risk of death from not receiving life-saving measures if required. The immediacy began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]: The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The JT began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral palsy (disorder that affects a person's movement, posture, and balance), lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy to lower extremity (decreased in muscle tissue size). Record review of admissions progress note, dated [DATE] at 5:20 p.m., reflected Resident # 1 was admitted from the hospital, full Code, with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral palsy and was on hospice. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was a full code CPR status, interventions included initial BLS CPR if the resident was without a heartbeat or not breathing. Notify EMS. Record review of Resident #1 Physicians orders, dated [DATE], reflected resident #1 was a full code CPR status. Record review of RN A's written statement (not dated) reflected Resident #1 was found unresponsive with no vital signs and no respiratory effort. This written statement reflected that she contacted hospice and notified the resident's representative of the residents passing. RN A's written statement reflected that she realized she made a serious error in not transporting Resident #1to the hospital for emergency services or initiating CPR. RN A's written statement reflected that she thought it was a condition of hospice admission that residents on hospice were a DNR and she should have double checked to be sure the Resident #1 had a DNR in place. In an interview with RN A on [DATE] at 11:49 am revealed she went into Resident #1's room and found Resident #1 to be unresponsive and her eyes dilated (the body's immediate response to involuntary to the cessation of blood circulation and muscle relaxation, indicating brain stem death). RN A stated she took Resident #1's vital signs with no pulse, no blood pressure and no respiration. RN A revealed she did not provide CPR or transport Resident #1 to the hospital because she thought Resident # 1 was a DNR. She stated she did not check the code status for Resident #1 because she assumed Resident #1 was a DNR because she was on hospice. She stated she notified hospice and Resident #1's representative. Interview with the administrator on [DATE] at 10:15 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was her aunt, and she was the resident's representative listed. She confirmed Resident #1 did not have a DNR on file for and RN A should have performed CPR. She stated she felt it would not have done any good because when RN A found Page 1 of 3 675867 675867 11/21/2025 Kerens Care Center 809 NE 4th St Kerens, TX 75144
F 0678 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety Residents Affected - Few Resident #1, she had already passed. She stated RN A should have attempted e life saving measures because Resident #1 was a full code CPR and RN A did not follow policy. Record review of the facility's CPR policy, undated, reflected CPR was a method of providing systemic circulation by manual chest compression and oxygen by mouth-to mouth breathing or providing air to the lungs via Ambu bag (a devise used in emergencies to help a person breath) to prevent death following cardiac or pulmonary arrest.Record review of the hospice death visit summary, dated [DATE] (no time), reflected the medical director was contacted on [DATE] at 1:25 a.m. by hospice RN and advised Resident #1 was absent of vital signs with dilated and fixed pupils (the body's immediate response to involuntary to the cessation of blood circulation and muscle relaxation, indicating brain stem death). The patient's death was expected. The doctor gave time of death as 1:25 a.m. The facility completed the following interventions prior to surveyor entry on [DATE]: Record review of facility in-service, dated [DATE] (no time), reflected all staff received in-service training on abuse, neglect, resident change of status, pronouncement of death, residents' rights, CPR, self-determination end of life measures, DNR, hospice, and oxygen administration. Interview with DON on [DATE] at 2:19 p.m. revealed that she worked at the facility for six months. She received in-service training at the time of hire and on [DATE] on abuse, neglect, resident change of status, pronouncement of death, residents' rights, CPR, self-determination end of life measures, DNR, hospice, and oxygen administration. She stated she would report abuse or neglect to the administrator. The DON reflected an example of abuse was physical harm of a resident and neglect was not performing proper care for a resident. She stated a resident's code status was found in the EMR and if a resident was found non-responsive, she would check the code status of the resident in the EMR. Interview with LVN A on [DATE] at 2:39 p.m. reflected that she worked at the facility for five years. She received in-service training at the time of hire and on [DATE] on abuse, neglect, resident change of status, pronouncement of death, residents' rights, CPR, self-determination end of life measures, DNR, hospice, and oxygen administration. She stated she would report abuse or neglect to the administrator. She stated an example of neglect was failure to provide care or keep a resident clean. She stated a resident's code status was found on a resident's face sheet in the EMR and if a resident was found non-responsive, she would check the code status of the resident in the EMR. Interview with LVN B on [DATE] at 2:52 p.m. revealed she worked for the facility for one year. She received in-service training at time of hire and on [DATE] on abuse, neglect, resident change of status, pronouncement of death, residents' rights, CPR, self-determination end of life measures, DNR, hospice, and oxygen administration. She stated that an example of neglect did not change a resident's soiled brief. She would report neglect or abuse to the administrator. She states a resident's code status could was in the EMR and if a resident was found non-responsive, she would check the code status of the resident in the EMR. Record review of facility file reflected the facility did a mock code blue (the facility code to signify a medical emergency) for all three shifts (6 a.m.-2 p.m., 2 p.m.-10 p.m., and 10 p.m.-6 a.m.) on [DATE] and then it would be done randomly every week for four weeks.Record review of RN A's personnel file reflected RN A was placed on unpaid investigatory suspension on [DATE]. Record review on [DATE] of the facility time sheet reflected RN A had not worked in the facility since [DATE]. Record review of the facilities code status assessment, dated [DATE], reflected the facility did a full audit of all residents' advanced directive orders, all advanced directive orders for full code and DNR were entered in the facility EMR (electronic medical record) correctly and reviewed all residents' code status were entered into the care plan and matched the physician orders. Record review reflected that the facility did an audit of the code status for all residents deceased in the last 60 days that reflected the code status was followed 675867 Page 2 of 3 675867 11/21/2025 Kerens Care Center 809 NE 4th St Kerens, TX 75144
F 0678 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety correctly.The immediacy began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]: The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The JT began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Residents Affected - Few 675867 Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0678SeriousS&S Jimmediate jeopardy

    F678 - Personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident

    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 21, 2025 survey of Kerens Care Center?

This was a inspection survey of Kerens Care Center on November 21, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Kerens Care Center on November 21, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician or..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.