Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

AVIR AT PECOSCMS #6758811 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #1). The facility failed to assess Resident #1 for safe transfer practices as she was non-weight bearing. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents in the building who required extensive assistance which could result in residents having pain, falls or injuries. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's Resident Face Sheet, dated 10/24/24, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, arthritis, dementia, muscle weakness, and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 8/12/24, revealed: She had a mental status score of 9 of 15 (indicating moderate cognitive impairment) She was dependent on staff for transfers from bed to chair. Review of current MDS did not indicate how many people were needed for transfers. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, edited 9/6/24, revealed: Problem: Limited physical mobility related to osteoarthritis/disability. Short term goal: will remain free of complications related to immobility, including contractures, thrombus formation (formation of blood clots); skin breakdown, fall related injury through next review date. Long Term Goal: will maintain current level of mobility through review date. Identified approaches included: provide with supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed. Review of current Care Plan did not indicate how many people were needed for transfers. Review of current EHR revealed no assessment regarding transfers. On 10/24/24 at 3:47 p.m. revealed CNA A helped Resident #1 sit up without locking the wheels on resident's bed. CNA A raised the bed to above the level of the wheelchair, moved the wheelchair (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 3 Event ID: 675881 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675881 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/24/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Avir at Pecos 1819 Memorial Dr Pecos, TX 79772 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few perpendicular to the bed and locked the wheelchair. Resident #1's feet did not touch the ground. CNA A placed the gait belt around Resident #1's waist and made sure it was tight enough. CNA A slid Resident #1 from the bed into the wheelchair while holding the gait belt. CNA A explained to Resident #1 what she was doing in Spanish the entire time. Interview on 10/24/24 at 4:05 p.m. CNA A stated Resident #1 could not bear weight and even when she did stand, she bent over completely. CNA A said Resident #1 was not a two-person transfer because she felt she could safely transfer Resident #1 on her own and there were times it was only her on the floor. CNA A stated she had told people she needed help and sometimes the nurses would help. CNA A said there were times she told the nurses that Resident #1 was non- weight bearing but nothing changed. Interview on 10/24/24 at 5:09 p.m. LVN B stated Resident #1 was non weight bearing. LVN B stated she thought one person could safely transfer Resident #1. LVN B stated she has performed a one-person transfer with Resident #1 in the past Interview on 10/24/24 at 5:27 p.m. the DON stated Resident #1 was weight bearing and was able to pivot. The DON stated a resident who was non-weight bearing was not safe to transfer with one person. The DON stated residents were assessed for transfer needs on admission, re-admission, and when the aides told the nurses that there was a change with residents ADL needs. The DON said they relied on the aides to tell the staff what a proper transfer was. The Regional Consultant who also present stated residents were assessed on admission, readmission, change of condition, and then usually when the MDS was done assessment needs were looked at. The Regional Consultant added they looked at transfer ability on therapy's recommendation and family request. The Regional Consultant stated the transfer ability was formally on the admission/re-admission assessment but nowhere else. The Regional Consultant stated there was not a form for a transfer ability assessment. Interview on 10/24/24 at 7:01 p.m. the MDS Coordinator stated Resident #1 was not weight bearing and as far as she knew Resident #1 was a one-person transfer. The MDS Coordinator stated she was unaware of a formal transfer assessment that the facility used. The Treatment Nurse who was also present stated she worked at the facility 20 years and was unaware of a formal transfer assessment they were just asked on admission and re-admission. Review of the facility's policy and procedure of Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised February 2014, revealed: In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents. Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. Nursing staff, in conjunction with the rehabilitation staff, shall assess individual residents' needs for transfer assistance on an ongoing basis. Staff will document resident transferring and lifting needs in the care plan. Such assessments shall include: Resident's mobility (degree of dependency) (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675881 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 3 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 675881 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 10/24/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Avir at Pecos 1819 Memorial Dr Pecos, TX 79772 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689 - Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Resident's size - Residents Affected - Few Weight bearing ability Cognitive status Safe lifting and movement of residents is part of an overall facility employee health and safety program, which: Involves employees in identifying problem areas and implementing workplace safety and injury-prevention strategies. Continually evaluates the effectiveness of workplace safety and injury-prevention strategies. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 675881 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 3

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0689GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F689 - Accidents

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 24, 2024 survey of AVIR AT PECOS?

This was a inspection survey of AVIR AT PECOS on October 24, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at AVIR AT PECOS on October 24, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.