F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1
of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's weekly skin assessments were performed timely, accurately, and
appropriately.
This failure could place residents at risk of missing treatment needs.
Findings included:
Record review or Resident #1's AR, dated 4/2/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to
the facility on [DATE]. He was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (which was the result of bacteria, that
caused an infection of the urinary system,) chronic kidney disease, stage 3 (which was a disease of the
kidney that disrupted the body's ability to filter impurities,) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (which was a
condition of the body that disrupted how the body used sugar for fuel.)
Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Section C., Cognitive Patterns;
Resident #1 had a BIMS Score of 15. (A BIMS Score of 15 indicated no cognitive impairment). Section M.,
Skin Conditions reflected Resident #1 he was not a risk for pressure ulcers; had no unhealed pressure
ulcers; had no venous or arterial ulcers; had no infections of the feet; had no diabetic foot ulcers; had no
open lesions of the feet; and he had no moisture associated skin damage. The resident did not reflect any
skin/ulcer or injury treatments. Section GG., Functional Abilities and (Range of Motion;) Resident #1 had no
impairment on either side of his upper extremities (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand) and no impairment in
either lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, and foot.) Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident
#1 was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, and putting
on/talking off shoes, sitting to standing, chair/bed to chair transfer, and tub/shower transfer. Being
dependent upon staff meant the helper did all of the effort, or the assistance of 2 or more helpers was
required for the resident, to complete the activity.
Record review of discharge paperwork for hospitalization from a 1/28/2024 to 2/2/2024. On 2/2/2024, the
resident returned to the nursing facility.
Record review of a complaint, made on 2/2/2024, reflected Resident #1 was hospitalized on [DATE] through
2/2/2024 for low blood pressure and low urine output. He released from the local hospital on 2/2/2024 to
return to the nursing facility. The complainant made allegations that Resident #1 was not
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
675884
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675884
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation
884 Hwy 84 W
Teague, TX 75860
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
receiving appropriate skin care.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Record review of Resident #1's CP, initiated on 2/2/2024, reflected a focus area for skin conditions,
evidenced by Resident #1 having returned from the hospital on 2/2/2024 with a stage II pressure injury to
his coccyx, tailbone, and a scabbed area on top of his bi-lateral feet. The goal, initiated on 2/5/2024,
reflected Resident #1 would have intact skin, free from redness, blisters, or discoloration. Resident #1's
pressure injury would show signs of healing and remain free from infection. The intervention, initiated
2/2/2024, reflected nursing staff would administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side
effects and effectiveness. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness.
Assess/record/monitor wound healing at least weekly. Measure length, width, and depth where possible.
Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed, and healing progress. Report declines to the
MD. Avoid positioning the resident on (coccyx). Do not massage over bony prominences and use mild
cleansers for peri care/washing. Educate the resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown;
including transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good
nutrition, and frequent repositioning.
Residents Affected - Few
Record review of Resident #1's WSA performed on WSA 2/15/2024 reflected other skin finding reflected
redness r/t friction on inner thigh area- barrier cream applied. Signed 2/28/2024 by the DON.
(The WSA was not completed timely as the document was dated to have occurred on 2/15/2024 but was
not signed until 13 days later on 2/28/2024.)
Record review of discharge paperwork for hospitalization from a 2/18/2024 to 3/3/2024. On 3/3/2024, the
resident returned to the nursing facility
Record review of Resident #1's WSA performed on 2/22/2024 reflected other skin finding reflected redness
r/t friction on inner thigh area-barrier cream applied. Signed 3/04/2024 by the DON.
(The WSA was not accurate because Resident #1 was not at the facility on 2/22/2024.)
Record review of Resident #1's WSA performed on 2/29/2024 reflected other skin finding reflected redness
r/t friction on inner thigh area-barrier cream applied. Signed 3/04/2024 by the DON.
(This WSA was not accurate because Resident #1 was not at the facility on 2/29/2024.)
Record review of a WSA performed on 3/14/2024 reflected other skin finding reflected redness r/t friction on
inner thigh area-barrier cream applied. Signed 3/20/2024 by the DON.
(The WSA was not completed timely as the document was dated to have occurred on 3/14/2024 but was
not signed until 6 days later on 3/20/2024.)
A telephone interview on 4/01/2024 at 12:57 PM with the complainant revealed Resident #1 admitted to the
local hospital for low urine output and low blood pressure on 1/28/2024. While in the care of the facility, the
complainant learned that Resident #1 had skin integrity issues and thought the facility could do more to
protect his skin. The hospital treated Resident #1's skin concerns and he discharged back to the nursing
facility on 2/2/2024.
Interview and observation on 4/02/2024 at 9:40 AM with Resident #1 revealed he had been at the facility
since the end of November 2023. He was observed was lying on his back. His feet and ankles were
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675884
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675884
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation
884 Hwy 84 W
Teague, TX 75860
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
in PU relieving boots with a pillow in between; There was a visible bandage on the resident's right foot/ankle
dated 4/01/2024. The visible portions of his feet were observed clean with recently trimmed nails. He
denied pain with his wounds. Resident #1 revealed he did not have any pressure ulcers on his body when
he came to the facility, but he had developed pressure ulcers and sores on his feet, ankles, and back side
since his arrival. Since his return to the facility on 2/2/2024, Resident #1 was receiving skin assessments,
ulcer assessments, and VOHRA. He has been provided with pressure relieving boots and staff have been
placing a pillow between his legs to provide comfort. He denied physical pain associated with his wounds.
Interview on 4/04/2024 at 2:15 PM with LVN B revealed she had been an LVN for 37 years and had been
working at the facility for the last 3.5 years. She stated that she had been trained to complete accurately
and to sign the treatment note once completed. She described timely documentation to be done as soon as
possible. She remembered a time when she was 2 days late with accurate and timely documentation and
she received a one-on-one counseling. She stated that staff was not allowed to enter documentation for
other staff members. She stated late and inaccurate documentation placed residents at [NAME] of meeting
treatments, the need for follow up assessments, and worsening health condition.
Interview on 4/04/2024 at 2:25 PM with LVN D revealed she had been an LVN for the last 8 years and had
been working at the facility for the last 10 months. She stated she had been trained to perform accurate
assessments and to make sure they were completed at the time. She explained she had been late one time
with an assessment and was counseled by the DON the next day. Timely and accurate documentation
helps the team provide care to the resident and inaccurate, or missing information, placed the resident at
risk of missing important aspects of care.
Interview and record review on 4/4/2024 at 4:40 PM with the DON revealed WSA were supposed to be
performed weekly. The WSAs were supposed to be filled out by the nursing staff and the assessments were
supposed to be passed along to the DON and the ADON with any issues or concerns. The DON stated
WSA performed on 2/15/2024 was completed by her but was not signed until 2/28/2024, 13 days later. She
stated she did not perform the WSA but got the assessment on a piece of paper from a nurse and entered
the information for a nurse after the fact. The WSA performed on 2/22/24 was completed by the DON on
2/22/24 but was not signed until 3/04/2024, 13 days later. The DON stated that she had been having trouble
with staff not completing their notes on time. She knew she was not supposed to be entering other staff's
documentation, but she did it anyway to help them out. If the resident's skin condition did not get identified
through assessments, the failure was the first line of defense, who were the CNAs, who did not report skin
conditions to the charge nurse. The second line of defense, who were the charge nurses, were supposed to
document skin conditions and refer those issues with the ADON and the DON. The third line of defense,
who were the ADON and the DON, were at fault for inaccurate assessments because they were not
checking behind the nursing staff. There were no safeguards in place to identify documentation errors. If
there were, she stated we would have caught them. The DON stated that untimely and inaccurate
documentation placed residents at risk of missing treatments, worsening of wounds, missing follow up care,
and having their needs go unmet. The DON was the facility's Assessment Coordinator.
Interview on 4/4/2024 at 4:40 PM with the ADM revealed he expected his staff to follow facility policy and
make sure assessments were accurate, appropriate, and timely. He stated a daily assessment should be
completed that day and a weekly assessment should be completed that week. Late documentation,
inaccurate, or inappropriate documentation placed the residents at risk of facing barriers to receiving good
care. A fail safe in place to catch errors in documentation was the standard of care meeting held each
week. Also, the DON and the ADON were supposed to be following up on staff to make
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675884
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675884
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
04/04/2024
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation
884 Hwy 84 W
Teague, TX 75860
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
sure documentation was being completed correctly. If there were documentation errors committed by the
DON, the ADM felt the regional nurse was at fault for not checking up and making sure the DONs
documentation was being done correctly. The DON was the facility's assessment coordinator.
Record review of the facility's Resident Assessment Policy, dated October 2023, reflected the assessment
coordinator was responsible for ensuring timely and appropriate resident assessments. Assessments were
completed by staff members who had skills and qualifications to assess relevant care areas and who were
knowledgeable about the resident's strengths and areas of decline.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675884
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4