F 0684
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and
care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan,
and the residents' choices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, in that:The facility
failed to conduct weekly skin assessments for Resident #1 on 7/10/25 and 07/17/25. These failures placed
residents at risk of physical harm, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of
Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/05/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to
the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: seizures (sudden, temporary disruption
of the brain's normal electrical activity, resulting in changes in behavior, movement, feelings, or
consciousness), lack of Coordination (having difficulty controlling your movements and making them work
together smoothly), protein calorie malnutrition (not getting enough food or the right food to maintain a
healthy body), and unspecified dementia severe without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance,
mood disturbance and anxiety (memory loss and thinking difficulties). Record review of Resident #1's
Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/01/2025, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 15, which
indicated cognitively intact. Resident #1 required setup or clean assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene,
shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and person hygiene. Record review
of Resident #1's care plan, dated 08/05/2025, reflected Resident #1 was care planned for potential for
pressure ulcer development r/t required assist with bed mobility with an intervention of follow facility
policies/protocols of prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. Review of Resident #1's weekly skin
assessment in the EMR on 08/05/2025, reflected Resident #1 did not have a weekly skin assessment
07/10/25 & 07/17/25. During an interview and observation Resident #1 on 08/05/2025 at 11:30am.,
Resident #1 stated he could not remember if he had his weekly skin assessment on 07/10/25 & 07/17/25.
Resident #1 stated he did not have any current skin issues. Resident #1 did not have any visible bruising or
skin issues. During an interview with LVN A on 08/05/2025 at 1:15 PM, LVN A stated the purpose of a
weekly skin assessment was to identify any new skin issues and monitor current skin issues. LVN A stated
that the weekly skin assessment was completed on the same day of the week each week by the charge
nurse. LVN A stated that 6/2 charge nurse was responsible for the 100 and 200 halls and 2/10 charge nurse
was responsible for the 300 and 400 halls. LVN A stated that she was not sure what nurse was worked on
07/10/25 & 07/17/25. LVN A stated if a resident's weekly skin assessment was not completed then the
resident could have a skin issues go untreated. During an interview with the DON on 08/05/2025 at 2:55
PM, the DON stated the purpose of a skin assessment was to identity and address any new skin concerns.
The DON stated all residents were supposed to receive weekly skin assessments. The DON stated it was
the charge nurse's responsibility to complete the weekly skin assessments. The DON was not aware that
Resident #1 had not had a skin assessment on 07/10/25 & 07/17/25. The DON stated that if a resident did
Residents Affected - Few
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675903
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675903
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/05/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Mexia Ltc Nursing and Rehab
601 Terrace LN
Mexia, TX 76667
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0684
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
not receive weekly skin assessments, then the resident could have a skin condition go untreated. The DON
stated she expected for weekly skin assessments to be conducted as scheduled. During an interview with
the ADM on 08/05/2025 at 3:45 PM, the ADM stated the purpose of a skin assessment was to ensure
residents did not have any adverse skin issues from the previous week. The ADM stated all residents were
supposed to receive weekly skin assessments. The ADM stated it was the charge nurse's responsibility to
complete the weekly skin assessments. The ADM stated it was the DON and ADON responsibility for
ensure the charge nurses were completing the weekly skin assessments as scheduled. The ADM was not
aware that Resident #1 had not had a skin assessment 07/10/25 & 07/17/25. The ADM stated that if a
resident did not receive weekly skin assessments, then the resident could have skin integrity issues that go
untreated. The ADM stated she expected for weekly skin assessments to be conducted as scheduled. The
ADM stated the facility did not have a weekly skin assessment policy. A record review of the facility's
Resident Examination and Assessment policy, dated February 2014, reflected, The purpose of this
procedure is to examine and assess the resident for any abnormalities in health status, which provides a
basis for the care plan. Physical Exam 8. Skin: a. intactness: b. moistures c. color d. texture; and e. presence
of bruises, pressure sores, redness, edema, rashes. Documentation The following information should be
recorded in the resident's medical record:1. The date and time to procedure was preformed2. The name
and title of the individual(s) who performed the procedure.3. All assessment data obtained during the
procedure.4. How the resident tolerated the procedure.5. If the resident refused the procedure, the reason
(s) why the intervention taken.6. The signature and title of the person recording the data.Reporting1. Notify
the supervisor if the resident refuses the examination.2. Notify the physician of any abnormalities such as,
but not limited to e. wounds or rashes on the resident's skin.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675903
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2