F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice
before a change is made.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written notice,
including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for
1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for room or roommate changes.The facility failed to ensure
Resident #1, and her RP received written notice prior to moving Resident #1 to another room. This failure
could place residents at risk of having their resident rights violated and being moved into another room
without notice.Findings include:Observation on 10/15/25 at 10:45 AM revealed Resident #1 was sitting up
in her wheelchair in her room. She was clean and well-groomed, and dressed appropriately for the day.
Resident #1's RP was also in her room placing items in her closet. Review of an undated face sheet for
Resident #1 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included
idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (a neurological disorder primarily affecting older adults,
characterized by gait disturbances, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence, often treatable through
shunt surgery), repeated falls, Alzheimer's disease, adult failure to thrive (a condition characterized by
significant decline in physical and emotional well-being, often leading to weight loss, decreased appetite,
and inactivity), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure),
hyperglycemia (low blood sugar) and depression.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS
Assessment, dated 08/31/25, reflected a BIMS Score of 3, which indicated a severe impairment in
cognition. The assessment further reflected Resident #1 required partial to substantial/maximal assistance
for her activities of daily living. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan Report, dated 02/14/25, reflected
she had a self-care deficit related to generalized weakness and right lower extremity weakness. The goal
reflected Resident #1 would maintain or improve her ability to participate in her care with ADLs and
experience safe transfers through the next review date by staff assisting with her activities of daily living
with one person assisting.Record review of Resident #1's progress notes in the electronic health record,
dated 09/22/25, reflected the DON communicated with the RP regarding the room change for Resident #1,
and the RP gave verbal approval. The DON requested the RP camera removal to come to the facility to
move the camera to the new room on Tuesday, 09/23/25 around 3:30 PM. No other concerns were
discussed at that time.Record review of Resident #1's electronic nursing note, dated 09/24/2025 at 4:51
PM, reflected the RP was contacted by the DON and ADM regarding Resident #1's room change. An
interview on 10/15/25 at 10:45 AM with the RP revealed on 09/24/25 the RP had a conversation with the
ADM that Resident #1 had already been moved. The RP stated the change of rooms was communicated to
her, but she was not notified in writing regarding the move and did not see the room before Resident #1
moved there. She further stated on 09/25/25 the camera had been moved along with Resident #1's
belongings to the new room. An interview by phone on 10/15/25 at 11:18 AM with the RP revealed the DON
informed her they could not move Resident #1's belongings to the new room along with the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
675909
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
675909
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/18/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Harker Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation
415 Indian Oaks Dr
Harker Heights, TX 76548
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0559
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
camera themselves and told her she would need to come and do it. The RP stated the next day when she
went to the facility, Resident #1's belongings were moved into the new room, and the ADM stated, I had to
move [Resident #1] to prove to the state that we did it. Interview on 10/15/25 at 1:43 PM with the SW, who
stated she worked in the facility for 4 months. She stated for a room change they had a team meeting,
obtained room numbers of rooms available, then they would reach out to the family, and show the room to
the resident. The SW stated she did not remember being involved in a move room/change for Resident #1.
The SW stated room changes were communicated to residents and families by verbal consent but not in
writing per facility policy. The SW further stated verbal consent from residents and family was written into a
progress note in the electronic health record. She stated Housekeepers moved the residents' belongings,
and social workers were in charge. An interview on 10/15/25 at 2:05 PM with the AD, who stated they
discussed room changes with residents and their families, if residents needed to change rooms. The AD
stated they discussed room changes during IDT meetings and saw the availability of rooms in the facility.
The AD stated they notified the family and residents verbally, and they asked if families wanted to be in the
facility during the move. The AD stated the camera should be removed by the family in person per her
understanding to make sure it's not broken and re-installed correctly. She stated the SW was in charge of
room changes, but other staff members could be involved in the family notifications. An interview on
10/15/25 at 2:19 PM with LVN A, stated the family must be notified and present during the Residents' move
from the other room. An interview on 10/15/25 at 3:30 PM with the ADM, stated the bathroom was not
working in Resident #1's previous room, and they moved Resident #1 into another room. He stated the
DON had verbally notified the RP of the room move. He further stated the RP became upset about the
facility already moving Resident #1, and the RP became aggressive towards staff members, and
threatening if they were to come near Resident #1. The ADM stated the room change for Resident #1 was
discussed at the IDT meeting, and there were many reasons for changing rooms, such as the room was not
appropriate. He further stated the families were notified verbally, and they were not required to notify the
residents or family in writing, according to the facility policy. An interview on 10/15/25 at 3:55 PM with the
DON, stated she worked in facility since August of 2025. The DON stated she talked to the RP on multiple
occasions. She further stated she called the RP regarding moving Resident #1 on Monday, 09/23/25, and
had spoken with her regarding the upcoming move. The DON stated the ADM notified her, and stated the
RP did not come on 09/23/25. She further stated a state surveyor told the facility to have Resident #1
moved to a different room with a working toilet, so they were under pressure to complete Resident #1's
room move. She stated they were trying to do the right thing by completing the room move and to be in
compliance with the state. The DON stated she discussed the urgency to be in compliance with the RP, and
she was not sure if the facility was supposed to remove the camera from Resident #1's previous
room.Attempted a review on 10/15/25 at 4:20 PM from the ADM and did not obtain a Policy & Procedure of
Resident Room Changes and whether the resident and/or RP should be notified in writing and/or
verbally.Record review of the facility's Policy & Procedure for Statement of Resident Rights, dated January
2023, reflected, Compliance Guidelines.15. To not be relocated within the community, except in accordance
with nursing community regulations.Refusals of Certain TransfersThe community will document reasons for
room transfers and refusals.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
675909
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2