F 0558
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure five (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5)
of thirteen residents received reasonable accommodation of needs.
Residents Affected - Some
The facility staff did not place call lights within reach for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5.
This failure could affect who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not
being met.
Findings included:
Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/16/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted
on [DATE], with diagnoses of surgical aftercare for an amputation, seizures, gastronomy status (tube
feeding) and Cerebral Palsy.
Review of Resident #1's care plans, dated 11/12/23, reflected she required two staff participation in moving
and turning in bed, and needed supervision/assistance with all decision-making.
Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 11/16/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female, initially
admitted on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (trouble breathing), pulmonary embolism (blockage in vessels that send blood to the
lungs), legal blindness, and schizoaffective disorder.
Review of Resident #2's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #2 was in a persistent
vegetative state or had no discernable consciousness.
Review of Resident #2's care plan, revised on 07/18/23, reflected she was at risk for impaired thought
processes related to her cognitive communication deficit. It also reflected she required 1 to 2-person
extensive assistance for her ADLs. A careplan revised on 11/15/23 reflected she had fall risk due to poor
balance, and had most recently fallen on 11/14/23.
Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 11/16/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on
[DATE], with diagnoses of a vertebral fracture, acute pain, unspecified altered mental status, and a history
of falling.
Review of Resident #3's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was able to understand others and be
understood by others, and had a BIMS score of zero, indicating possible severe cognitive impairment. The
document reflected no behavioral issues, or indicators of delirium for Resident #3.
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
676023
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676023
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/16/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center
8703 Davis Blvd
Keller, TX 76248
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Some
Resident #3's prior level of functioning (before his current illness or injury) was documented as independent
in self-care, mobility, and cognitive function.
Review of Resident #3's care plan, initiated 10/28/23, reflected the resident was at risk for falls, with the
intervention of Be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed.
( .) Needs a safe environment: floors free from spills and/or clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a working and
reachable call light, ( .)
Review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 11/16/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on
[DATE], with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, schizophrenia, generalized muscle weakness, and other
abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #4's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was able to understand others, and be
understood by others, and had a BIMS score of 12, indicating potential moderate cognitive impairment.
Resident #4 had no behavioral issues, or indicators of psychosis. He required supervision to limited
assistance of one person for ADL's.
Review of Resident #4's care plan, revised on 10/02/23, reflected he was at risk of falls, with the
intervention of Be sure the call light is within reach and encourage to use it to call for assistance as needed.
( .) Needs a safe environment: floors free from spills and/or clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a working and
reachable call light, ( .)
Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 11/16/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old woman, admitted
to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, new daily persistent headache, and restlessness
and agitation.
Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident was rarely or never
understood. The document reflected staff were unable to assess her cognitive function. Resident #5 used a
wheelchair.
Review of Resident #5's care plan, revised on 09/27/23, reflected the resident was at risk of falls, with an
intervention of Needs a safe environment: floors free from spills and/or clutter; adequate, glare-free light; a
working and reachable call light, ( .)
Observation on 11/16/23 at 9:31 AM revealed Resident #1 and Resident #2 both in bed, sleeping soundly.
Resident #1's call button cord was hanging over itself where it was plugged into the wall, and not within her
reach. Resident #2's call button was not in reach, but was clipped to the call light cord, near where it was
plugged into the wall.
An interview and observation on 11/16/23 at 9:35 AM with RN A revealed she did not think Resident #1
would ever be able to use her call light, because she was not alert, and they had to anticipate all of her
needs. She thought Resident #2 might use hers though, because she was alert and went around in her
wheelchair. She was new, so she was not sure. She then went into the room, roused Resident #2, placed
her call button on her bed next to her hand, and told the resident where it was. The resident did not say
anything.
An observation on 11/16/23 at 9:43 AM of Resident #5 revealed her to be sleeping soundly. Her call light
was hanging over the headboard of her bed, with the button between the headboard and mattress, and the
level of the mattress was higher than the top of the headboard, placing the button out of
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676023
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676023
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
11/16/2023
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center
8703 Davis Blvd
Keller, TX 76248
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558
sight for a person at the level of the mattress.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
An interview and observation on 11/16/23 at 9:46 AM revealed Resident #3 and Resident #4 to be alert,
and able to speak with the surveyor. Both of their call buttons were visible beneath their beds, near the
center of the bed. He said he did not know his call button was under his bed, and he had not ever used it,
and was not really aware of it. He said he did not need it, because the staff came and checked on him so
much. Resident #3 said he had once tested his call light out of curiosity and unplugged it. He said it was
plugged in now. He said he was not aware it was under his bed, but he had not used it, and had not missed
it, because the staff checked on them, and he got up and did whatever he wanted to do.
Residents Affected - Some
An interview on 11/16/23 at 9:54 AM with CNA B revealed the rooms where the call lights were not in place
were the part of the hallway he was responsible for, and he was responsible for making sure the buttons
were in place. He said he was new at the facility but had been a CNA for a long time, and the facility went
through all of the training with him when he started, which included call lights. He said he checked on his
residents frequently and was not aware any of the lights were out of reach of the residents. He said that if
they could not use them, they could possibly fall or not be able to get someone's attention.
An observation on 11/16/23 at 9:57 AM revealed Resident #2 to be awake, but non-interviewable.
An interview on 11/16/23 at 11:07 AM with ADON C revealed all staff were responsible for checking call
lights when they were in the rooms, but the CNAs were at the forefront, because they went into the rooms
so often. She said the call lights were important because they were the residents' lifeline.
An interview on 11;16/23 at 11:29 AM with ADON D revealed the hall where the call light concern was
noted was one of the halls she was responsible for, and when she heard there was an issue with call lights,
she went to check. She said Residents #1, #2, and #5 would be able to use a call light, but in the room
Resident #3 and Resident #4 shared, one of the lights was still under the bed when she checked, and one
was clipped to the bed. She said that even residents who were confused should have call lights within
reach. She said it was both a dignity and a safety issue, and the lights enabled residents to let staff know if
they needed help, or were in pain or distress, or even just needed some ice.
An interview on 11/16/23 at 2:49 PM with the Administrator revealed her expectation to be that call lights
were within reach of all residents. She said Residents #1, #2, and #5 would not be able to use a call light
and some of them were on hospice. She said they made accommodations for any resident who would be
able to use one, like using the touch pad type of button. The Administrator said Resident #3 and Resident
#4 both were very independent and able to walk and talk. She said there were many risks for a resident in
not being able to get assistance as needed, including falls. She said the call lights were part of the angel
rounds the staff did every morning, and in the section of the hall where the problem was found, she thought
the person responsible for those rounds had not done them yet, due to finishing up helping with breakfast.
Record review of facility policy Routine Procedures: Call Light/ Bell, revised 07/2015, reflected POLICY: It is
the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff.
PROCEDURES: ( .) 5. Leave the resident comfortable. Place the call device within resident's reach before
leaving room.
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676023
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3