F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan to meet the resident's
needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's
care plan accurately documented the resident's need for supervision when actively eating/drinking. These
failures could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. The findings include: Record review of
Resident #1 's face sheet, dated 8/6/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility
on [DATE] and discharged to hospital on 7/12/25. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: heart failure,
acute respiratory failure, prostate cancer, pacemaker, Bell's Palsy (dripping of the face), dementia (decline
in mental ability), anxiety (a feeling of unease), lack of coordination, and dysphasia (difficulties swallowing).
The RP was listed as: family member. Record review of Resident#1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE],
reflected a BIMS score of 03, indicative of severe impairment in cognition. The ADLs for eating was
documented as independent and support was set-up. Record review of Resident# 1's Care Plan, dated
2/17/25, reflected the goals and interventions included: Eating as Set up assistance. Record review of
Resident#1's Physician' Orders, dated July 2025 reflected: Diet was listed as controlled carb diet; soft and
bite texture, Nectar/Mildly Tick consistency. The physician order, revised 11/12/24, reflected the resident
required standard swallowing precautions: and Supervision and assistance with positioning and set up of
meal tray every shift. Record review of Resident #1's SP evaluation, dated 1/16/24, authored by the SP,
read: .Oral Phase=Mild. [mildly impaired to chew and managing food in month]. Record review of Resident
#1's SP evaluation, dated 2/19/25, authored by the SP, read: .Supervision for Oral Intake=Distant
Supervision. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 10:11 AM, the SP stated: she saw the resident several times
and the resident had difficulties with swallowing. The SP evaluation on 01/16/24 reflected a mild oral
dysphasia to effectively manage food in his mouth. The SP stated the last evaluation on swallowing was
done on 2/19/25 and the findings demonstrated the resident [#1] had mild oral and pharyngeal (second
stage of swallowing) and no overt signs of aspiration. The SP stated the resident required close supervision
in feeding; distant supervision. The SP defined distant supervision as a staff member being present or
within eyesight when feeding or drinking occurred by the resident. The SP stated based on the SP findings
after 2/19/25, a staff should not lose eyesight of the resident when the activity of eating or drinking
occurred. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 3:44 PM, the Dietician stated: the resident was on a diabetic diet
(controlled carbs), soft bite texture, and nectar mildly thicken. The Dietician stated the resident required
supervision for eating. The Dietician stated supervision meant the staff had to be in proximity when
Resident #1 ate for safety reasons. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 5:10 PM, the DON stated: the process
of accurate clinical documentation started with assessments and then completion of the care plan. The
DON stated the SP assessment, dated 2/19/25, that Resident#1 required distant supervision and the
physician order stated the
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 3
Event ID:
676041
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676041
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Mission at Blue Skies of Texas East
4949 Ravenswood Dr
San Antonio, TX 78227
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
resident required supervision when eating and drinking. The DON stated she could not give an explanation
why the care plan did not mention anything about supervision when the resident was actively eating of
drinking liquids.During an interview on 8/7/25 at 11:44 AM, the DON stated she was aware of the SP
assessment done on 2/19/25 and the recommendation for supervision of Resident #1 when he actively ate
or drank liquid. The DON stated the care plan for Resident #1 did not list any instructions on supervision
when the resident actively ate or drank liquids. The DON stated the information was necessary to convey to
nursing staff special instructions which involved Resident #1. During a telephone interview on 8/7/25 at
11:48 AM, the MD stated she was aware of the SP recommendation for Resident #1 to be supervised when
actively eating and consuming liquids. The MD stated she agreed with the recommendation and when her
company took over the medical management of residents, Resident #1's order reflected the resident be
supervised when actively eating or drinking. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 4:38 PM, the MDS Nurse
stated: the process of documentation was for the facility to conduct assessments, the assessment
information was captured in the MDS and then reflected in the care plan. The MDS Nurse stated the clinical
record task did not properly capture the SP recommendation on 2/19/25 and the MD order on 11/12/2024;
and she had no further explanation. The MDS Nurse stated the data had to be accurate for continuity of
care and to avoid any clinical errors. Record review of the facility's Documentation Policy dated January
2025, read: .General Principles.All entries must be factual, accurate, complete, current, and legible. Record
review of the facility's, undated, Feeding the Resident procedure read: Resident Care Plan.List the type of
diet as part of appropriate plan of care.If resident is unable to feed himself/herself, list the amount of
assistance, adaptive equipment, frequency of weight monitoring, feeding program or occupational therapy
for functional training.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676041
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 3
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676041
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/08/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
The Mission at Blue Skies of Texas East
4949 Ravenswood Dr
San Antonio, TX 78227
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted
professional standards and practices, that were complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents
(Resident #1) reviewed for documentation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's nurse progress notes
accurately documented when the resident's vitals were taken. These failures could place residents at risk of
their records not accurately documenting interventions, monitoring, and information provided to the
interdisciplinary team. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1 's face sheet, dated 8/6/25,
reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to hospital on
7/12/25. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: heart failure, acute respiratory failure, prostate cancer,
pacemaker, Bell's Palsy (dripping of the face), dementia (decline in mental ability), anxiety (a feeling of
unease), lack of coordination, and dysphasia (difficulties swallowing). The RP was listed as: family member.
Record review of Resident #1's Nurse Note, dated 7/12/25 at 9:50 AM, authored by LVN A, reflected the
resident went out on pass with family. Record review of Resident #1's Nurse Note, dated 7/12/25 at 12:17
PM, authored by LVN A, reflected the resident returned to the facility at 12:15 PM. Record review of
Resident #1's Nurse Note, dated 7/12/25 at 10:31 AM, authored by LVN A, reflected vitals were taken at
10:31 AM and some vital readings listed were: temperature 97.7 Fahrenheit and blood pressure 99/62.
Record review of Resident #1's Nurse Note, dated 7/12/25 at 10:36 AM, by LVN A reflected she did a skin
check of the resident. The resident's skin was described as Warm & dry.During a telephone interview on
8/7/25 at 3:41 PM, LVN A stated she assessed the resident on 7/12/25 in the morning around 8:00 AM.
LVN A stated I made a mistake by entering the notes when the resident was not in the facility. LVN A stated
she should have entered the notes at time of occurrence or made a comment of a late entry note. LVN A
stated she was in a hurry in writing her nurse notes, on 7/12/25, and made a mistake in listing the resident
as continent when the resident had always been incontinent. LVN A stated she was in a hurry and listed the
wrong time for the vitals on the 7/12/25 nurse note. LVN A stated the vitals were taken before the resident
went out on a family visit on 7/12/25 at 10:00 AM. The LVN A stated accurate documentation informed the
interdisciplinary team of services and care given to a resident. During an interview on 8/7/25 at 3:47 PM,
the DON stated her expectation was nursing documentation occurred at the time of occurrence or
sometime shortly after. The DON stated the nurse [LVN A] could have made a late entry or in the nurse
note stated the information written referred to a different time and date. The DON stated she could not
explain the inaccurate medical record which involved LVN A and the nurse documentation on 7/12/25 in
reference to Resident #1. During an interview on 8/8/25 at 10:08 AM, the Administrator stated: the LVN [A]
should have entered her notes as a late entry on 7/12/25. The Administrator stated not labeling the nurse
notes as late entry might have caused a confusion to the reader as to when the assessment was done. The
Administrator stated the clinical record for any resident had to reflect the current condition of the resident.
The Administrator stated, the clinical had to capture the right information. The Administrator stated the
information may have been inaccurately documented in the clinical record which involved Resident#1.
Regarding the documentation vitals were documented at 10:32 AM for Resident #1 on 7/12/25 when the
resident was not in the facility, the Administrator offered the following explanation: not usual for vitals to be
done at an earlier time and placed in the formal record at a different time. Record review of the facility's
Documentation Policy dated January 2025, read: .General Principles.All entries must be factual, accurate,
complete, current, and legible.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676041
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 3