Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

TOWN HALL ESTATES ARLINGTON, INC.CMS #6760804 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 4 deficiencies. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Residents #3) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not ensure the Activity Director treated residents with dignity and respect by referring to Resident #3 as a feeder. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 03/08/24, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident #2's admission MDS Assessment, dated 02/14/24, reflected she had a BIMS of 06 indicating severe cognitive impairment. During a dining observation on 03/08/24 at 11:56 AM, the Activity Director asked an unknown staff if Resident #2 was a feeder or if Resident #3 could eat on her own. The Activity Director was in the middle of the dining room where 15 residents were currently seated at different tables. Interview on 03/08/24 at 12:00 PM with Resident #2 revealed she wanted to know where her lunch tray was and would not answer any other questions. Interview on 03/08/24 at 12:15 PM with the Activity Director revealed she had confused Resident #2 with a different resident who had the same first name when she asked the unknown staff if Resident #2 was a feeder or not. The Activity Director said she used the word feeder because that was what she was if she could not eat on her own. The Activity Director said no one had ever talked to her about or trained her to use a different word or phrase to refer to residents as besides feeder. The Activity Director said it would probably make residents feel bad and as if they were a baby being referred to as that term especially in front of other residents. The Activity Director said she should probably refer to residents as needing or helping to assist them with eating. (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 6 Event ID: 676080 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676080 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/08/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Town Hall Estates Arlington, Inc. 824 W Mayfield Rd Arlington, TX 76015 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0550 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Interview on 03/08/24 at 3:14 PM with the DON revealed staff using the term feeder was not appropriate and instead they should use the phrase a resident who needs assistance eating. The DON said the purpose of using this phrase was for resident rights and was a dignity issue. The DON said the risk of residents being referred to as a feeder was that it could cause depression and they could have emotional distress. The DON said she had spoken to staff a lot of times about not using the feeder term and it was everyone's responsibility to use the correct phase. Review of the facility's policy, revised October 2010, and titled Resident Rights Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures reflected: .to provide general guidelines for resident rights while caring for the resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676080 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676080 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/08/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Town Hall Estates Arlington, Inc. 824 W Mayfield Rd Arlington, TX 76015 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0622 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to provide Resident #1's family with discharge instructions. This failure could place residents at risk of a disruption of the continuum of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia causing decreased breathing and oxygen levels, and Parkinson's. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. His Functional Status indicated he required minimal assistance with his ADLs, was independent in walking, and totally dependent on staff for his cognitive function. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 02/05/24, indicated he was receiving physical and occupational therapy and would require home health when discharged home. Review of Resident #1's EHR revealed a signed discharge order by the physician. No discharge instructions/teaching could be located. Interview on 03/08/24 at 2:00 PM, the DON stated when a resident was discharged a copy of the discharge paperwork was sent with the resident and a signed copy stayed with the resident's chart. The DON asked to locate Resident #1's discharge paperwork not found in his EHR. The DON stated the Medical Records Clerk was hospitalized and unable to be contacted to help locate the paperwork. Review of the facility's policy Discharge Summary and Plan, dated December 2016, reflected: When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment. The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676080 If continuation sheet Page 3 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676080 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/08/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Town Hall Estates Arlington, Inc. 824 W Mayfield Rd Arlington, TX 76015 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0803 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Some Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for 1 out of 2 meals (the lunch meal on 03/08/24) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet were served pureed bread during the lunch meal on 03/08/24. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss, hunger, unwanted weight gain, and metabolic imbalances. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 03/08/24, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident #2's admission MDS Assessment, dated 02/14/24, reflected she had a BIMS of 06 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of a list of residents served a pureed diet, dated 03/08/24, reflected the facility had a total of ten residents on a pureed diet. Review of the facility's menu for the lunch meal on 03/08/24 revealed crunchy fish, Creole potatoes, spinach/sauteed onions, roll/margarine, chocolate/yogurt mousse. Observation and interview on 03/08/24 at 12:10 PM with Resident #2 revealed she was still hungry and wanted a roll like the other residents had on their plates around her. Resident #2 only had three pureed items on her plate which were pureed fish, pureed spinach, and mashed potatoes. Resident #2's meal ticket reflected the following: P crunchy fish, P creole potatoes, P spinach/sauteed onions, P bread/[NAME]. Interview on 03/08/24 at 12:11 PM with [NAME] D revealed there was not pureed bread made or served for the lunch service today. Interview on 03/08/24 at 12:25 PM with the Dietary Manager revealed she knew the pureed bread was not served for the lunch meal today because she never had her staff make the pureed bread for any meal. The Dietary Manager said she only had her staff make the pureed meat, pureed starch, pureed vegetable, and pureed dessert for every meal. The Dietary Manager said she was not sure if she was supposed to serve pureed bread but said that residents on a regular diet always received their bread or roll with each meal. The Dietary Manager said she expected all residents to receive the same food that was on the menu, including bread. The Dietary Manager said the risk was that residents could complain about not getting the same food and become upset or not getting the nutrients needed which could lead to weight loss. The Dietary Manager said [NAME] D was responsible for making the pureed bread but since the Dietary Manager did not know about it either it was not made. The Dietary Manager said she was ultimately responsible for making sure all foods in all forms were prepared for each meal (continued on next page) FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676080 If continuation sheet Page 4 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676080 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/08/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Town Hall Estates Arlington, Inc. 824 W Mayfield Rd Arlington, TX 76015 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0803 though. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Interview on 03/08/24 at 3:14 PM with the DON revealed residents on a pureed diet should receive all meal components as a resident on a regular diet. The DON said the kitchen was responsible for making each meal component and following the menu and she was not aware the pureed bread was not being made for each meal. The DON said the risk was that residents could not be receiving enough calories and carbohydrates and were getting less nutrition which meant they were at risk of weight loss. Residents Affected - Some FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676080 If continuation sheet Page 5 of 6 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676080 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 03/08/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Town Hall Estates Arlington, Inc. 824 W Mayfield Rd Arlington, TX 76015 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #3) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented on Resident #3's February 2024 MAR that she received her medications. This failure could affect residents that received medications and place them at risk of inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 03/08/24, revealed the resideent was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included COVID-19, Type 2 diabetes (a condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar), and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment, reflected she had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders reflected the following: - Vitamin E Oral Capsule 450 MG (1000 [units]) (Vitamin E) Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for vitamin Review of Resident #3's February 2024 MAR revealed blank spots for the following order: Vitamin E Oral Capsule 450 mg (1000 [units]) give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day for vitamin; on the following dates: 02/08/24 and 02/09/24. Observation and interview on 03/08/24 at 12:00 PM revealed Resident #3 was sitting in her wheelchair at a table in the dining room. Resident #3 said she was doing good but was hungry and was wondering when the food was going to come. Resident #3 was unable to answer additional questions. Interview on 03/08/24 at 3:14 PM with the DON revealed when staff administered medications to residents they were supposed to sign off on the MAR. The DON said if the resident refused the medication, they should use the code to indicate that. The DON said the staff on duty were responsible for documenting the administration of the medication. The DON said she was supposed to be checking resident MARs to make sure staff were documenting the administration of the medications. The DON said the purpose was so that the medication would not be given twice leading to medication duplicates. The DON said the risk was that residents may not get the proper dosage of the medication if there was no documentation it was administered. Review of the facility's policy, revised December 2012, and titled Administering Medications reflected: .19. The individual administering the medication must initial the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676080 If continuation sheet Page 6 of 6

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

4 citations recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0550GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F550 - Resident Rights

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • 0622GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F622 - Transfer and discharge-

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

  • 0803GeneralS&S Epotential for harm

    F803 - Menus and nutritional adequacy

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • 0842GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F842 - Resident-identifiable information

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 8, 2024 survey of TOWN HALL ESTATES ARLINGTON, INC.?

This was a inspection survey of TOWN HALL ESTATES ARLINGTON, INC. on March 8, 2024. The surveyor cited 4 deficiencies, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at TOWN HALL ESTATES ARLINGTON, INC. on March 8, 2024?

Yes, 4 deficiencies were cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her right..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.