F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered
care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's
medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs, for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care
plans.
The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan with the DNR code status after the OOH DNR order
was signed by all appropriate parties on [DATE].
This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care out of line with their wishes.
Findings included:
Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an initial
admission date of [DATE] and a current admission date of [DATE]. Pertinent diagnosis included Unspecified
Dementia (dementia without a specific diagnosis or a diagnosis that is not yet known). Resident #1 was
discharged on [DATE] due to death.
Record review of Resident #1's PPS MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 0 (severe
impairment).
Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan dated [DATE] revealed the focus [Resident #1]
wishes to have CPR performed should the need arise initiated on [DATE] and cancelled on [DATE]. The
goal listed for this focus included Resident, family, surrogate will have wishes respected initiated on [DATE]
and cancelled on [DATE]. Interventions listed for the focus included:
-Ensure chart is properly identified initiated on [DATE] and cancelled on [DATE].
-If resident has no pulse or respirations, initiate CPR initiated on [DATE] and cancelled on [DATE].
Record review of Resident #1's order summary revealed a discontinued order for DNR initiated on [DATE]
and ended on [DATE].
Record review of Resident #1's OOH DNR order revealed the document was signed by Resident #1's RP
and two non-staff witnesses on [DATE]. The document was signed by the physician on [DATE].
In an interview with LVN A on [DATE] at 9:27 AM, LVN A stated if she did not know a resident's code
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676087
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676087
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
05/14/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Cimarron Place Health & Rehabilitation Center
3801 Cimarron
Corpus Christi, TX 78414
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
status, she would check the front page of the MAR. LVN A stated a resident's code status should be listed
on the care plan as well. LVN A stated it was important to keep the care plan updated so everyone on the
healthcare team knew how to care for the resident. LVN A stated if the code status was incorrect on the
care plan it was possible for a resident with a signed OOH DNR to receive CPR or vice versa.
In an interview with LVN B on [DATE] at 10:06 AM, LVN B stated if she needed to know the code status of a
resident, she would check the resident's MAR or the binder at the nurse's station which contained the code
status for all residents at the facility. LVN B stated she did look at resident's care plans to ensure she was
up to date on how to care for her residents. LVN B stated if the code status was not accurate in the care
plan, it was possible a resident with an active DNR order could receive CPR or a resident with a full code
order could not receive CPR.
In an interview with the ADON on [DATE] at 11:09 AM, the ADON stated, typically, the social worker
updated the code status in the care plan for residents. The ADON stated it was a team effort to ensure the
care plans were accurate. The ADON stated if the care plans did not accurately reflect a resident's code
status, the resident could receive CPR unnecessarily or not get CPR when they wished to receive it.
In an interview with the DON on [DATE] at 1:30 PM, the DON stated nurses could look in PCC or the binder
at the nurse's station to determine a resident's code status. The DON stated when a resident wished to go
from a full code status to DNR status, they met with the social worker who started the process. The DON
stated once the OOH DNR form was signed by all parties, the social worker would inform the nurses to put
the new DNR order in the resident's chart. The DON stated it was a team effort to ensure the care plan was
updated appropriately. The DON stated if the care plan did not accurately reflect the resident's current plan
of care, a nurse could provide inappropriate care to a resident such as using improper transfer methods or
not taking a resident's behavior into account.
In an interview with the LMSW on [DATE] at 2:24 PM, the LMSW stated she had meetings with families and
residents about updating their code status. The LMSW stated once the form was signed by all parties, she
informed the DON and charge nurses about the update to the resident's code status. The LMSW stated she
was normally the one to update the care plan with the new code status if she uploaded the OOH DNR into
PCC. The LMSW stated sometimes the MDS nurse uploaded the DNR into PCC. The LMSW stated she
remembered Resident #1 was a DNR but did not know why Resident #1's care plan was not updated with
the correct code status. The LMSW stated if a resident's care plan was not updated in a timely manner,
staff may not know the current best way to care for a resident.
Record review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered last revised on
[DATE] revealed the following:
.8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will:
.e. Include the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes;
.i. Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals;
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676087
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2