F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and
actions that can be measured.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered
care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and
timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in
the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #1) of ten residents reviewed for care plans. The facility
failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for Residents #1 that addressed physician
ordered orthopedic devices, behaviors involving orthopedic devices, and an ordered sitter during scheduled
dialysis. This failure could place residents at risk for not attaining the highest practicable well-being
possible. Findings Include:Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/06/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old
female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dependance
on renal dialysis (occurs when a person's kidneys are no longer able to adequately filter waste and excess
fluid from the blood, necessitating regular dialysis treatments to sustain life), chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and unspecified
psychosis not due to a substance or known (indicates a psychotic disorder where the cause is not clearly
identified as being due to substance use or a medical condition). Review of Resident #1's care plan, revised
on 04/03/25, reflected Resident #1 needed dialysis related to renal failure. Resident #1's care plan did not
reflect the dialysis MD order that required Resident #1 have a sitter during her dialysis treatments. Resident
#1's care plan did not reflect her orders for ordered orthopedic devices of resting hand splint and palm
protector on LUE or behaviors involving orthopedic devices. Review of Resident #1's Resident Assessment
and Care Screening MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive
impairment. Review of Resident #1's physical therapy order, dated 05/22/23, reflected Resident #1 was to
wear resting hand splint on left hand don (to put on, specifically clothing or equipment) after breakfast and
doff (to take off, specifically clothing or equipment) after lunch as tolerated. Resident #1 was also ordered
skin checks by nursing, pre and post wear, and report any changes immediately every day and evening
shift. Review of Resident #1's physical therapy order, dated 07/06/25, reflected Resident #1 was to wear
palm protector on LUE. [NAME] splint after lunch and doff splint before dinner and skin checks pre and post
splint wear and report any concerns immediately every day and evening shift for therapy.Review of
Resident #1's MD dialysis order dated 12/19/24 reflected patient must be accompanied by a sitter for all
dialysis treatments for safety. Interview on 08/06/25 at 11:08 am with a Dialysis Nurse A, via telephone,
from Resident #1's dialysis clinic, reflected the dialysis MD said Resident #1 needed a sitter during her
dialysis treatments because Resident #1 pulled out her needle and had been sent to the hospital because
she lost a lot of blood. The dialysis nurse said sometimes Resident #1 had a sitter from the facility and
sometimes the sitter was a family member. The dialysis nurse said Resident #1 missed 2 dialysis
appointments
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 8
Event ID:
676097
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
(she said she could not recall the dates) because Resident #1 did not have a sitter, and they sent Resident
#1 back to the facility without dialysis. She said if Resident #1 missed treatments Resident #1 could have a
buildup of potassium and increased confusion because of toxin build up and an increase in fluid overload.
She said she was not informed by the facility of any negative side effects because of Resident #1's missed
dialysis appointments, and she said that she was not concerned about Resident #1 and fluid overload
because Resident #1 was usually underweight when she was weighed at dialysis.Interview on 08/06/25 at
1:14 pm with the OTA revealed Resident #1's orthopedic devices were ordered to prevent future
contractions, problems with skin integrity, and to not lose hand range of motion. Interview on 08/07/25 at
2:06 pm with CNA reflected Resident #1 was constantly taking off her orthopedic devices and he informed
the nurses of this behavior. Interview on 08/06/25 with LVN B at 12:38 pm reflected a care plan was how
the facility was caring for residents and should be very detailed. She said the LVNs and DON were
responsible for resident care plans. LVN B said Resident #1 did tend to rip off the orthopedic devices. She
said it was a part of her job to report Resident #1 was not wearing her orthopedic devices and this behavior
needed to be care planned. She said care planning was important for residents to get the proper care they
needed and avoid a negative effect. Interview on 08/06/25 at 3:33 pm with the MDS Coordinator revealed
she was the person who was overall responsible for the care plans. She said a care plan paints a picture of
what the resident needs. She said a care plan should absolutely be person centered and include resident
behaviors and diagnoses. She said she worked the floor sometimes doing resident care. She stated staff
talked about resident behaviors in the morning meetings, but she was not aware of Resident #1's behavior
of her removing her orthopedic devices. If a resident had an orthopedic device, it needed to be care
planned. She said that orthopedic devices are many times used as a preventive device and the reason a
resident was prescribed an orthopedic device should be care planned. She said the negative effect of not
care planning for an orthopedic device was that it could be essential to the resident's care and be needed
to prevent skin breakdown or nails that were growing too long. She said it was important that Resident #1's
dialysis MD order for a sitter during dialysis should be care planned because Resident #1's dialysis clinic
would not allow Resident #1 to have her dialysis treatment if a sitter was not at dialysis. Interview on
08/07/25 at 4:21 pm with the ADON reflected that the care plan was the resident bible or resident outline of
their needs and wants. She said refusal of care should be care planned to include Resident #1's refusal or
removal of her orthopedic devices. She said she was aware that sometimes Resident #1 removed her
orthopedic devices. Resident #1 took them off herself. She said the aides and nurses have told her that
Resident #1 sometimes removed her orthopedics devices. She said that having this behavior care planned
forecasts what her care should have been, and it could explain if she did not have improvement from the
prescribed orthopedic devices. She said it should be care planned that Resident #1 was required by the
dialysis MD that she have a sitter at dialysis because if it was not care planned it could result in the refusal
of the dialysis facility to allow her dialysis. She said everyone was responsible for care plans. Interview on
08/07/25 at 4:58 pm with the DON reflected a care plan was the individualized care for that resident and
included the type of care the facility would provide for that resident. She stated care plans should be person
centered based on the resident specific needs. She said orthopedic devices should be care planned
because the facility needed to know the devices the resident needed and what they were used for to
provide proper care. She said a resident's refusal to wear orthopedic devices should be care planned
because there were interventions in the care plan to help with resident refusal. She said care plans were
the responsibility for all facility departments for all the different aspects necessary for resident
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0656
care. She said it was important to care plan the need of a sitter at dialysis for Resident #1 because it was
necessary to the care of Resident #1.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0688
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM
and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility received
appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum
practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility is demonstrably unavoidable for one of five
residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, on 08/06/25,
was wearing her physical therapy ordered resting hand splint for left hand. This failure could place residents
at risk of not maintaining the mobility necessary maintain the highest practicable well-being. Findings
Include:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/06/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was
admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependance on renal
dialysis (occurs when a person's kidneys are no longer able to adequately filter waste and excess fluid from
the blood, necessitating regular dialysis treatments to sustain life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and unspecified psychosis not
due to a substance or known ( indicates a psychotic disorder where the cause is not clearly identified as
being due to substance use or a medical condition).Review of Resident #1's care plan reflected Resident
#1 had a care plan focus revision dated 04/21/2025 of activities of daily living self-care performance deficit
related to history of CVA (a medical term for stroke) with increased weakness impaired cognition.
Intervention dated 04/18/2025 monitor/document/report to medical doctor as needed signs and symptoms
of immobility: contractures forming or worsening.Review of Resident #1's Resident Assessment and Care
Screening MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #1's physical therapy order dated 05/22/23, no discontinued date, reflected Resident #1
was to wear resting hand splint on left hand don (to put on, specifically clothing or equipment) after
breakfast and doff (to take off, specifically clothing or equipment) after lunch as tolerated and skin checks
by nursing pre and post wear and report any changes immediately every day and evening shift.Review of
Resident #1's eMAR dated 08/06/25 documented by LVN B for Resident #1 to wear resting hand splint on
left hand don (to put on, specifically clothing or equipment) after breakfast and doff (to take off, specifically
clothing or equipment) after lunch as tolerated and skin checks by nursing pre and post wear and report
any changes immediately every day and evening shift reflected hand splint applied to left hand. Observation
on 08/06/25 at 12:10 pm with LVN B of Resident #1's left hand reflected no hand splint.Interview on
08/06/25 at 12:38 pm with LVN B reflected facility policy was that nurses documented in the eMAR that a
treatment had been administered after it had been administered. She stated she did not put Resident #1's
resting hand splint on her left hand but documented that she had done so. LVN B said usually the aides
were good and knew when to put on resident orthopedic devices. She said she charted it was on, but it was
off, and she should have made sure it was on. She said it was her responsibility to make sure that Resident
#1's orthopedic hand splint was on Resident #1 because obviously it was not. She said if Resident #1's
hand splint was not applied; Resident #1 could suffer a hand contracture. Interview on 08/06/25 at 1:14 pm
with the OTA revealed Resident #1's orthopedic devices were ordered to prevent future contractions,
problems with skin integrity, and to not lose hand range of motion. Interview on 08/07/25 at 2:06 pm with
CNA reflected Resident #1 was constantly taking off her orthopedic devices and he informed the nurses of
this behavior.Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:21 pm with the ADON reflected nurses document in the eMAR after
resident care had been done and on completion of the task. A potential problem of not confirming that a
task had been completed was mis-documentation of records
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0688
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
and giving the wrong information to oncoming staff, resident injury, or medication error. It was the
responsibility for the nursing administration, the ADON and the DON to make sure that all nurses are
documenting properly in resident eMAR. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:21 pm with ADON C reflected nurses
documented in the eMAR after care had been given to the resident. It was a problem when you
documented that care had been done when it had not been done because that was falsifying
documentation. She said the negative effect of documenting care that was not received would be that the
resident would not get the most proper or efficient care. She said it was the responsibility of everyone to
make sure that the residents' care was documented accurately. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:58 pm with the
DON reflected it was important that nurses did not document care that a resident did not receive. It was not
good nursing care or quality of care to document care that you did not give to a resident. The negative
effect of documenting care was given when it was not given was that it could affect MD orders and could
have a long-range effect for the care and treatment of the resident. The DON said it was the responsibility
of nursing management, the ADON and the DON, to make sure that nurses had properly documented
treatments given.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 5 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in
accordance with accepted professional standards.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted
professional standards and practices, that the facility maintained medical records on each resident that
were accurately documented for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records.The
facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's application of her orthopedic device and dialysis wound
dressing removal.This failure could place residents at risk of not identifying or receiving care, for
unassessed changes in conditions and improper documentation of treatments.Findings Include:Review of
Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/06/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility
on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependance on renal dialysis (occurs when
a person's kidneys are no longer able to adequately filter waste and excess fluid from the blood,
necessitating regular dialysis treatments to sustain life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of
lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and unspecified psychosis not due to a
substance or known ( indicates a psychotic disorder where the cause is not clearly identified as being due
to substance use or a medical condition).Review of Resident #1's care plan revised on 04/03/25 reflected
Resident #1 needed dialysis related to renal failure.Review of Resident #1's Resident Assessment and
Care Screening MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/06/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility
on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependance on renal dialysis (occurs when
a person's kidneys are no longer able to adequately filter waste and excess fluid from the blood,
necessitating regular dialysis treatments to sustain life), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of
lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and unspecified psychosis not due to a
substance or known ( indicates a psychotic disorder where the cause is not clearly identified as being due
to substance use or a medical condition).Review of Resident #1's care plan revised on 04/03/25 reflected
Resident #1 needed dialysis related to renal failure.Review of Resident #1's Resident Assessment and
Care Screening MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.
Review of Resident #1's order dated 05/22/23, no discontinued date, reflected Resident #1 was to wear
resting hand splint on left hand don (to put on, specifically clothing or equipment) after breakfast and doff
(to take off, specifically clothing or equipment) after lunch as tolerated and skin checks by nursing pre and
post wear and report any changes immediately every day and evening shift.Review of Resident #1's eMAR
dated 08/06/25 documented by LVN B for Resident #1 to wear resting hand splint on left hand don (to put
on, specifically clothing or equipment) after breakfast and doff (to take off, specifically clothing or
equipment) after lunch as tolerated and skin checks by nursing pre and post wear and report any changes
immediately every day and evening shift reflected hand splint applied to left hand. Observation on 08/06/25
at 12:10 pm with LVN B of Resident #1's left hand reflected no hand splint.Review of Resident #1's order
dated 04/09/24 reflected remove dressing from AV Fistula (an abnormal connection between an artery and
a vein) site left arm post dialysis the following day of Resident #1's dialysis. Record review of Resident #1's
progress note by LVN A dated Wednesday 06/09/25 reflected Resident returned from dialysis via EMS,
Resident did not receive dialysis due to family not showing up. Resident stable and in good spirits. Record
review of Resident #1's eMAR dated Thursday 06/10/25 documented by LVN A reflected dressing was
removed from AV Fistula (an abnormal connection between an artery and a vein) site left arm post
dialysis.Record review of Resident #1's progress note by LVN A dated Thursday 07/07/25
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 6 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
reflected Notified by EMS transporters that resident was refusing to go with them to be transported to
dialysis. Spoke with resident, she stated she was tired and would not go to dialysis today.Record review of
Resident #1's eMAR dated Friday 07/08/25 documented by LVN A reflected dressing was removed from AV
Fistula (an abnormal connection between an artery and a vein) site left arm post dialysis.Record review
Resident #1's progress note by the DON dated Monday 07/11/25 reflected Resident unable to dialyze,
returned to facility. Notified daughter and MD, resident in stable condition.Record review of Resident #1's
eMAR dated Wednesday 07/12/25 documented by LVN A reflected dressing was removed from AV Fistula
(an abnormal connection between an artery and a vein) site left arm post dialysis.Interview on 08/06/25 at
12:38 pm with LVN B reflected facility policy was that nurses documented in the eMAR that a treatment had
been administered after it had been administered. She stated she did not put Resident #1's resting hand
splint on her left hand but documented that she had done so. LVN B said usually the aides were good and
knew when to put on resident orthopedic devices. She said she charted it was on, but it was off, and she
should have made sure it was on. She said it was her responsibility to make sure that Resident #1's
orthopedic hand splint was on Resident #1 because obviously it was not. She said it was her responsibility
to make sure it was charted correctly. She said charting something for a resident that had been done, when
it had not been done was not good nursing practice. She said if Resident #1's hand splint was not applied,
Resident #1 could suffer a hand contracture. Interview on 08/06/25 at 2:11 pm with LVN A reflected that
Resident #1 had an order for her dressing to be removed from her AV Fistula site left arm post dialysis on
every evening shift the day after Resident #1 received dialysis. He said he would remove the bandage from
Resident #1's arm if it was not actively bleeding. He stated that if Resident #1 did not go to dialysis, she
would not have the bandage and there would be no reason to document the removal of the bandage. He
agreed that he documented that he removed the bandage on 06/09/25, 07/08/25, and 07/12/25, when she
had not received dialysis the day prior. He said that it was a problem because he charted something that
did not happen and that was not good nursing practice. He said in the eMAR there are a bunch of different
click offs and he might have just clicked off that he administered the treatment. He said that if you do not
administer a procedure, you do not chart that you have administered the procedure. He said it was the
responsibility of the nurse to document accurately and a negative effect of not charting properly was that
you would not know what treatment the resident received. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:21 pm with the ADON
reflected nurses document in the eMAR after resident care had been done and on completion of the task. A
potential problem of not confirming that a task had been completed was mis-documentation of records and
giving the wrong information to oncoming staff, resident injury, or medication error. It was the responsibility
for the nursing administration, the ADON and the DON to make sure that all nurses are documenting
properly in resident eMAR. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:21 pm with ADON C reflected nurses documented in
the eMAR after care had been given to the resident. It was a problem when you documented that care had
been done when it had not been done because that was falsifying documentation. She said the negative
effect of documenting care that was not received would be that the resident would not get the most proper
or efficient care. She said it was the responsibility of everyone to make sure that the residents' care was
documented accurately. Interview on 08/06/25 at 4:58 pm with the DON reflected it was important that
nurses did not document care that a resident did not receive. It was not good nursing care or quality of care
to document care that you did not give to a resident. The negative effect of documenting care was given
when it was not given was that it could affect MD orders and could have a long-range effect for the care and
treatment of the resident. The DON said it was the responsibility of nursing management, the ADON and
the
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 7 of 8
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676097
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
08/06/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
2100 Dover Crossing Lane
Navasota, TX 77868
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0842
DON, to make sure that nurses had properly documented treatments given.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676097
If continuation sheet
Page 8 of 8