F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to
prevent accidents.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as
free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance
devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 15 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for supervision.The facility failed
to protect Resident #1, who had a history of exit seeking, from eloping from the secured unit courtyard on
12/18/2025. Resident #1 was left unsupervised in the male unit's courtyard and the courtyard's exterior
gate was unlocked. Resident #1 exited the courtyard and was located 2 blocks away in the local library
parking lot. Resident #1 was located by a staff member who was leaving the facility from their shift. The
facility was unaware Resident #1 was missing during this time. The non-compliance was identified as past
non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began 12/18/2025 and ended on 12/23/2025. The facility
corrected the non-compliance before surveyor's entrance. This failure could place residents at risk of not
being properly supervised resulting in injury or death. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's
facility face sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male that was admitted on [DATE] with a
diagnosis of dementia (impaired memory).Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan dated
8/17/2024 indicated Resident #1 was an elopement risk and wanderer as evidenced by disoriented to
place, history of attempts to leave facilityunattended, impaired safety awareness and was on the male
secured unit.Record review of Resident #1's elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident
#1 was a risk for elopement. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]
indicated Resident #1 could not complete a BIMS and a SAMS was completed indicating cognition was
impaired and had poor decision making and required supervision. Record review of facility incident report
for Resident #1 dated 12/18/2025 at 3:00 pm completed by the LVN D indicated Notified by staff speech
therapist had picked resident up walking by library. Resident assisted back into building . I didn't know
where I was going. assisted staff in getting resident back into building head to toe assessment done no
injuries noted. Will continue to monitor for any adverse reactions or problems. Report indicated the
physician and family were notified. Record review of Resident #1's order summary report dated 01/05/2026
indicated Resident #1 had an order to be admitted to the male secure unit for active exit seeking behaviors
as of 9/24/2025.Record review of Resident #1's secured unit consent undated indicated Resident #1
required a secured unit due to pointless wandering and elopement attempts and placement was to protect
him from unsafe environments such as busy streets signed by his family, physician and facility nursing staff.
During an observation and interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:20 a.m., the secured male unit had 15 residents
and 2 staff were present on the unit. Resident #1 was asleep in a recliner in the common area. CNA F said
that the male secured unit staffed 2 persons, and all staff float to help when staff take breaks. She said that
the secured unit doors were locked, and a keypad was used to enter and leave. She said to go outside, the
door to the courtyard was secured and staff must supervise all
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 4
Event ID:
676103
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676103
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation
46 May Street
Wells, TX 75976
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
residents when they were in the courtyard. She said the maintenance supervisor monitored the locks and
changed the codes regularly. She said after Resident #1 eloped there was a camera in the courtyard until
the gate was repaired. She said she had been trained in the supervision of residents that wander and are at
risk for elopement and it was important to keep all residents safe. During an observation on 01/05/2026 at
10:23 a.m., the male secured unit exit doors were locked by a magnetic lock with a keypad code. The
courtyard had a wooden fence around the perimeter, and the gate was locked with a magnetic lock and
keypad as well. There was apparent new wood on the gate door, new locking mechanisms and the gate
door was secure.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:31 a.m., CNA B said she was working the male
unit the day Resident #1 eloped. She said she and CNA A had taken all the residents to the main dining
room for the resident Christmas party. She said she was not sure who brought Resident #1 back to the unit,
but they had let him out to the courtyard unsupervised, and he left through the courtyard gate. She said that
somehow the gate's magnetic lock stopped working and the door was open, and he just walked out. She
said the maintenance director had completed a generator test earlier and the gate was secure. She had
been told when a generator test happened, she had to check the doors to make sure they relocked. She
said she was not sure what time Resident #1 had left and was told about it after he returned. She said
afterwards the gate had a camera until it could get repaired and no residents were allowed to go into the
courtyard without supervision now. She said that a gate left open for residents that suffer from memory
issues could get lost or injured. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:35 a.m., CNA A said that she was
in the dining room for the party when the incident with Resident #1 happened. She said she did not know
when he left the facility grounds and was later told when he returned. She said the nurse checked him out
and a camera was placed in the courtyard until the gate could be repaired. She said since the incident
someone came and fixed the lock on the courtyard gate, and they received training on the magnetic locks
and checking them to ensure they were locked, and all residents must be accompanied by a staff member
when they are in the courtyard. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:50 a.m., the Maintenance
Supervisor said that he checked all the locks on the doors almost daily and had checked all the locks the
morning of 12/18/2025 on the male secured unit. He said he ran a generator test around noon and had
personally gone to each secured unit to reactivate the magnetic locks on the doors and courtyard gate. He
said they were all working fine and was not sure what happened after his last check. He said he called the
company that repairs the locks and placed an order for repair. In the meantime, he placed a camera at the
gate in the courtyard, and no residents were allowed outside in the courtyard without staff assistance. He
said when the lock company came to do the repairs, they said the magnetic locks had lost their magnet and
were all replaced. He said he continued to check them several times a week, after generator tests and as
needed and had educated the staff to always check the gates when they were outside. He said when
Resident #1 eloped he had assisted residents back on the secured unit after the party. He said the aide
working the hall had asked about residents going outside and he had told her he could go outside but
thought she knew he had to be supervised. He said that residents that required a secured unit should be
supervised and if left unsupervised they could get hurt.During an observation and interview on 01/05/2026
at 11:30 a.m., Resident #1 was awake and sitting in a recliner in the common area of the men's secured
unit. He was calm and pleasant. He was unable to recall leaving the facility and said he liked where he lived
but wanted to find his car and go home to his wife soon.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 12:45 p.m.,
CNA C said she was working the men's secured unit on 12/18/25 with CNA A. She said all the residents but
one had gone to the Christmas party and she stayed on the unit. She said she did not recall letting
Resident #1 outside the day he
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676103
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676103
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation
46 May Street
Wells, TX 75976
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
eloped and thought the Maintenance Supervisor let him outside. She said it was busy with the party and
everyone coming back to the unit at the same time. She said she was not aware that Resident #1 had left
the facility until the DON came to the unit and told her. She said the Maintenance Supervisor did something
to the gate lock and placed a camera in the courtyard. She said she was inserviced that the residents could
not go outside alone and how to check the locks to make sure they were working correctly. She said that
residents that elope could get hurt. During an observation on 01/05/2026 at 1:00 p.m., there were 3 male
residents including Resident #1 outside in the men's unit courtyard smoking. CNA F was present with them.
Resident #1 was ambulatory without any assistive devices. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 2:15 p.m.,
LVN C said the day of Resident #1's elopement, all the resident's had been in the main dining room for a
Christmas party. She said CNA C was on the hall because 1 resident did not come to the party. She said
after the party, unsure of the time, all the residents we assisted back to the secured unit. She said
sometime after that the SLP called the activity director and told her that Resident #1 was in the parking lot
at the library and she was bringing him back to the facility. She said when he returned, he was calm and
pleasant but tired. She assessed him, called the doctor and the family and the maintenance supervisor and
DON went to see how he had gotten out of the facility. She said they did every 15 minute head counts on
the men's unit until a camera was placed the next day. She said the administrator monitored the camera
footage until the gate was repaired a few days later. She said they were all inserviced in supervision,
wandering and elopement and the residents were no longer allowed in the courtyard without supervision.
During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 2:45 p.m., CNA E said she was working the day Resident #1 eloped.
She said she had not known about the elopement until the DON inserviced her and all the staff on
elopements, wandering and supervision at all times when in the courtyard. She said that it was important to
keep all residents safe because they could get hurt. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 2:48 p.m., the
DON said the day of Resident #1's elopement he had been at the Christmas party and sometime after he
returned to the hall an aide let him out in the courtyard unsupervised. She said at that time, he exited the
courtyard through the gate that had somehow become unlocked. She said the activity director told her the
SLP had called about Resident #1 being at the library and she was bringing him back to the facility. She
said he was immediately assessed, the MD was called, and the family was notified. She said the
Maintenance Supervisor and herself started looking to see how he got out and discovered the courtyard
gate was unlocked. She said she started inservices on wandering, elopement and supervision in the
courtyard and every 15 minute head counts were initiated on the male secured unit as well. She said the
next day a camera was placed outside in the courtyard, and the video was monitored 24/7 by the
administrator until the gate was repaired. She said she was responsible for oversight in the facility and
training on safety of residents at risk for elopement. She said that elopements were taken seriously
because residents could be injured if they elope.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 3:13 p.m., the SLP
said she had worked on 12/18/2025 and attended the Christmas party. She said she had left for the day
and on her way down the street she saw Resident #1 walking in the library parking lot near the main
highway. She said she pulled over and addressed him, and he said he was looking for his car. She said he
was pleasant and got in her car without any issues and she drove him back to the facility. She said she had
called the activity director from her car to let her know she had found him and was bringing him back. She
said when they arrived back at the facility the nurses assisted him inside and started assessing him for any
injuries. She said she was glad she drove that way because he could have gotten hurt if he wasn't found so
quickly. She said afterwards the DON did inservices on supervision of residents at all times in the courtyard
and the maintenance
(continued on next page)
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676103
If continuation sheet
Page 3 of 4
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676103
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
01/07/2026
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation
46 May Street
Wells, TX 75976
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0689
Level of Harm - Immediate
jeopardy to resident health or
safety
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
supervisor did repairs to the gate.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 4:15 p.m., the Administrator said
that as soon as they were notified of Resident #1's elopement they started their interventions. She said they
discovered the gate lock was no longer working, put every 15 minute resident counts into effect until a
camera was installed on 12/19/2025. At that time, she monitored the camera for activity 24/7 and kept a log
of any activity. The staff were inserviced and the gate was repaired on 12/23/25. Resident #1 was
assessed, and he had no injuries or negative outcomes. They started an action plan and contacted the
doctor and family. She said the residents on the secured unit can no longer go into the courtyard
unsupervised.Record review of the facilities Wandering and Elopements policy dated March 2019 indicated,
.The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while
maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents.On 01/06/2026 at 12:26 p.m., the Administrator
was informed of the IJ. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on
12/18/2025 and ended on 12/23/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation
began. The interventions and plan for correction included:Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive
care plan dated 12/18/2025 revealed Resident #1's care plan was updated for his elopement with new
interventions to include: monitor for emotional distress times 72 hours, complete head to toe assessment to
assess for any injuries or abnormalities, notify physician and family of incident, provide additional training to
all staff regarding elopement and review elopement policy and procedure, resident to be supervised while
out in courtyard and not to be left unattended and update elopement assessment. Record review of
Resident #1's medical record revealed an incident report was completed on 12/18/2025 with physician and
family notifications, comprehensive assessment was completed on 12/18/2025, emotional distress
assessment was completed on 12/18/2025, 12/19/2025, and 12/20/2025 and a new elopement risk
assessment was completed 12/18/2025.Record review of an in-service titled Secured unit outside
supervision dated 12/18/2025 with 47 employee signatures. Record review of in-service titled Elopement
and Wandering Residents dated 12/18/2025 with 47 employee signatures.Record review of a Every 15
Minute Head Count dated 12/18/2025 to 12/19/2025 revealed all residents on the male secured unit were
accounted for starting 12/18/2025 at 3:00 pm until 12/19/2025 at 4:45 pm. Record review of a log titled Ring
Camera revealed the camera was installed on 12/19/2025 and was monitored from 12/19/2025 until
12/23/2025 when the gate was repaired. Record review of elopement drills for day and night shifts dated
12/22/2025 with 27 employee signatures.Record review of an invoice from the repair company dated
12/23/2025 revealed the exterior gates magnetic lock and z bracket were replaced and working. During
observations from 01/05/2026 to 1/07/2026 Resident #1 as well as all the residents on the male secure unit
was supervised when outside in the courtyard. On 01/06/2026 at 12:26 p.m., the Administrator was
informed of the IJ. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 12/18/2025
and ended on 12/23/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676103
If continuation sheet
Page 4 of 4