Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Inspection

RIO GRANDE CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTERCMS #6761191 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0558 Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 (Resident #138) of eight residents reviewed for call lights: Residents Affected - Few Resident #138's call light was not placed within reach and provided with a soft ball device for ease of use by the resident. This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident's #138's admission record face sheet, dated 05/17/23 indicated Resident #138 was an 88 -year-old male admitted on [DATE] with dementia (inability to remember, think, or make decisions), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (metabolic disorder in which body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time, heart failure (heart disease that affects pumping of the heart muscles), chronic ulcer of the other part of left foot (a perforation of the skin), spinal stenosis (spinal canal narrowing, causing pain), dorsalgia (pain in the upper back), and hallucinations (sensory experiences that appear real but are created in the mind). Record review of Resident #138's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident -had a BIMS score of 09 with cognition moderately impaired. -had other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts) -required extensive assistance by two persons for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. -required extensive assistance by one person for transfers. -used a wheelchair as mobility device. Record review of Resident #138's care plans indicated resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and debility, date initiated 04/27/23. Interventions included Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676119 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676119 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 05/18/2023 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Rio Grande City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2530 Central Palm Dr Rio Grande City, TX 78582 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0558 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance, date initiated 04/27/23. Observation and interview on 05/17/23 at 9:38 am revealed Resident #138 seated in his wheelchair in his room next to his bed. Resident's call light cord was clipped to the pillow in his bed and the cord was lying across his bed. The push button for call light was on the opposite side of the bed from where Resident #138 was sitting in his wheelchair. Resident #138 said he would use his call light to ask for help but he but could not reach the call light where it was placed. Resident #138 said he would have to yell out if he needed help. Interview on 05/17/23 at 9:40 am with CNA A revealed he had transferred Resident #138 into his wheelchair and forgot to clip the call light cord to the resident's shirt so he could use his call light to ask for help. CNA A said Resident #138 was able to use his call light, but he forgot to place it on his lap when he had transferred the resident. On 05/17/23 at 9:45 am Resident #138 demonstrated he could use the push button call light. Resident #138 said his right shoulder and arm were hurting. On 05/17/23 at 2:51 pm interview with LVN C revealed staff were in-serviced on placing resident's call lights within reach so they could use when they needed assistance. A new call light with a soft ball or bulb was placed for Resident #138 so he could use without pain or discomfort. LVN C resident had not voiced he felt pain when using the push button call light. On 05/17/23 at 2:55 pm, Resident #138 demonstrated he could use the soft ball bulb call light device without pain or discomfort. Interview on 05/17/23 at 3:20 pm with the DON revealed the staff should have placed Resident #138' call light where he could reach even when he was seated in his wheelchair. The DON said a soft ball/bulb type of call light should have been provided to the resident since he had recently had a seizure that affected his right shoulder and arm. The DON said Resident #138 had not voiced he had pain when using his call light button even after he had the seizureThe DON said if the resident didn't have his call light accessible and within his reach, he would not be able to call for help or assistance. Record review of the facility policy titled Answering the Call Light dated July 2015 indicated The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676119 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0558GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F558 - The right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 18, 2023 survey of RIO GRANDE CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER?

This was a inspection survey of RIO GRANDE CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER on May 18, 2023. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at RIO GRANDE CITY NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER on May 18, 2023?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.