Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

OAK GROVE NURSING HOMECMS #6761221 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0658 Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality. Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for following physician orders. (Resident #11) Residents Affected - Few The facility did not change the dressings to Resident #11's drains every day as ordered. This failure could place the residents at risk of infection and the drain sites not healing. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated August 2024 indicated Resident #11, re-admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of kidney stones and retroperitoneal abscess (an unusual type of abscess [a confined pocket of pus] that occurs in the retroperitoneal space [the tissue that lines the abdominal wall and covers the abdominal organs]).The consolidated orders indicated The drain sites were to be cleaned with normal saline, pat dry, apply topical antibiotic ointment and cover every day until drains are removed. Record review of the most recent significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 was recently re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). The resident had an impairment in range of motion to the upper and lower extremities bilaterally, had an indwelling catheter/nephrostomy (surgery to make an opening from the outside of the body to the renal pelvis used to drain urine) and a diagnosis of retroperitoneal abscess. Record review of a care plan updated 08/20/24 indicated Resident #11 had drains to the left lower back. The goal was for the resident to have no complications. The interventions indicated to perform treatment to drain sites as ordered. During observation and interview on 08/19/24 at 9:14 a.m., Resident #11 said he had been in and out of the hospital for kidney stones and an abscess to his kidney. The resident had 2 long slender white tubes with a drainage bag attached to each tube. One drainage bag had a clear yellow fluid, and one drainage bag had a scant amount of dark yellow fluid. During an interview on 08/19/24 at 9:26 a.m., LVN A said Resident #11 had kidney stones and went in the hospital for removal of the stones with a stint put in. The resident then went back in the hospital for pain and the surgeon removed more stones and replaced the stints. The resident returned and after several days he began having pain and a knot appeared on his left lower back, so he was sent back out to the hospital. He said they learned the surgeon had cut his kidney during the procedure (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676122 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676122 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 08/21/2024 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Oak Grove Nursing Home 6230 Warren St Groves, TX 77619 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0658 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few and an abscess formed. The surgeon had to remove the abscess and put drains in to assist with healing. He said the resident saw the urologist last week, but they did not remove the drains. LVN A said one of the drains went directly into Resident #11's abscess and one drain went directly into the kidney. During observation and interview on 08/20/24 at 10:15 a.m., LVN A adjusted Resident #11 for wound care. There were 2 drain sites covered with gauze. Both gauzes were dated 08/17/24. LVN A said the gauzes were dated 08/17/24. He said he got busy yesterday on 08/19/24 and did not change the drain dressings as ordered. He said he did not work on 08/18/24, LVN B worked on 08/18/24. He said the possible negative outcome of not changing the dressing as ordered would be infection to the drain sites. The urine to the drainage bag from the kidney was clear yellow. The kidney drainage site was clear without signs of infection. The drainage bag from the abscess site had a scant amount of dark yellow drainage. The abscess insertion site was clear and without signs of infection. The resident denied pain to either drain site. During an interview on 08/20/24 at 10:38 a.m., LVN B said she changed the drain dressings for Resident #11 on Saturday 08/17/24 but did not change the dressings on Sunday 08/18/24. She said she had a lot of stuff going on lately and just forgot. She said the possible negative outcome of not changing the drain dressings could be infection to the drain sites. During an interview on 08/20/24 at 2:52 p.m., the DON said her expectations were for the wound care to be performed as ordered. She said the possible negative outcome would be Resident #11 could get an infection. Record review of a Dressing, Dry/Cleanpolicy revised September 2013 indicated: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. (Note: This may be generated from a facility protocol.) 2. Review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine if there are special resident needs. Reporting: 1. Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the dressing change. 2. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Record review of a Nephrostomy Tube, Care of policy revised October 2010 indicated: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of the resident with a percutaneous nephrostomy tube. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Event ID: Facility ID: 676122 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0658GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F658 - Comprehensive Care Plans

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 21, 2024 survey of OAK GROVE NURSING HOME?

This was a inspection survey of OAK GROVE NURSING HOME on August 21, 2024. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at OAK GROVE NURSING HOME on August 21, 2024?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.