F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for
services as needed.
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the resident review (PASARR)
program under Medicaid in subpart C for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR services.The
facility failed to submit a complete and accurate request for NFSS in the LTC online portal within 20 days
after the initial IDT meeting held on 6/14/24.This failure could place residents who were PASRR positive at
risk of not getting the PASRR services for a better quality of life and could lead to a decline in
health.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/16/25 revealed a [AGE]
year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: encephalitis (inflammation of the
brain) and encephalomyelitis (inflammation of the brain and spinal cord), demyelinating disease (affects the
protective cover around nerve cells) of central nervous system, manic episode (a period of abnormally
elevated extreme changes in mood, behavior, activity, and energy level) without psychotic symptoms,
bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), functional quadriplegia (a
complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty), and major depressive disorder.Record review
of Resident #1's most recent quarterly MDS annual assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 15
meaning intact cognitive response.Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated revision dated 1/7/25
indicated Resident #1 has been identified as having PASRR positive DD and has refused all services.
Interventions were: if Resident #1 changes his mind regarding services, staff to contact county with any
changes. Will conduct annual meetings. Record review of Resident #1's PCSP dated 6/14/24 revealed the
initial IDT meeting was held on 6/14/24. Attendees included Resident #1, LIDDA- Habilitation Coordinator,
DON, DOR, MDS Coordinator A, MDS Coordinator B, and Resident #1's RP. The following NFSS were
identified and confirmed: Customized Manual Wheelchair, Specialized Assessment OT, Specialized
Assessment PT, Specialized Assessment ST, Specialized OT, Specialized PT and Specialized ST - all
services were coded 2 indicated new.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 4:24 pm, with MDS Coordinator A
and the DOR, MDS Coordinator A said the initial IDT meeting was held on 6/14/24. The DOR said Resident
#1 was approved for PT, OT, and ST and Resident #1 refused all the evaluations. MDS Coordinator A said
this was the first time they ran into a situation where the resident refused services, and she was not sure
what to do with this situation. MDS Coordinator A said she contacted the PASRR representative from the
Local Authority for guidance when the resident refused. MDS Coordinator A said initially Resident #1, and
his RP were ok with the services offered but then Resident #1 refused. MDS Coordinator A said they had
an annual meeting with Resident #1 recently and he refused again.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 9:15
am, with Resident #1, he said he refused services because he was going to get steroids to help him
walk.During an interview on 12/30/25 at 9:04 am with Resident #1's RP, the RP said Resident #1 needed to
see a psychiatrist because he had mental issues. The RP said she had trouble with Medicaid insurance
because Resident #1's physician no longer takes his insurance.During an interview on
(continued on next page)
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other
safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the
date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER
REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Page 1 of 2
Event ID:
676195
Printed: 05/15/2026
Form Approved OMB
No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
676195
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY
COMPLETED
12/30/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Falcon Point Post Acute
23553 West Fernhurst Drive
Katy, TX 77494
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency.
(X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
(Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644
Level of Harm - Minimal harm
or potential for actual harm
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99)
Previous Versions Obsolete
12/30/25 at 10:37 am with MDS Coordinator A she said the DOR is normally responsible for submitting the
NFSS form in the LTC portal. MDS Coordinator A said they discussed the NFSS form as a team and
checked the portal daily to see if the NFSS form was approved. MDS Coordinator A said Resident #1 was
able to make his own decisions. She said Resident #1 would probably benefit from the services, but they
cannot force him to do anything.During an interview on 12/30/25 at 11:15 am with the Administrator, he
said the MDS Coordinator, and the DOR were responsible for submitting the NFSS form. He said he
thought the hiccup was when Resident #1 initially said yes to the services and then refused. The
Administrator said there was no risk to Resident #1 because he had refused all services.Record review of
the facility's PASRR policy not dated read in part . Ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for
a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with
MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their
needs .
Event ID:
Facility ID:
676195
If continuation sheet
Page 2 of 2