Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health inspection

Falcon Point Post AcuteCMS #6761951 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This survey cited 1 deficiency. The full statement and the facility’s plan of correction follow, verbatim from the federal record.

F 0644 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR services.The facility failed to submit a complete and accurate request for NFSS in the LTC online portal within 20 days after the initial IDT meeting held on 6/14/24.This failure could place residents who were PASRR positive at risk of not getting the PASRR services for a better quality of life and could lead to a decline in health.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/16/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) and encephalomyelitis (inflammation of the brain and spinal cord), demyelinating disease (affects the protective cover around nerve cells) of central nervous system, manic episode (a period of abnormally elevated extreme changes in mood, behavior, activity, and energy level) without psychotic symptoms, bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), functional quadriplegia (a complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty), and major depressive disorder.Record review of Resident #1's most recent quarterly MDS annual assessment dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 15 meaning intact cognitive response.Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated revision dated 1/7/25 indicated Resident #1 has been identified as having PASRR positive DD and has refused all services. Interventions were: if Resident #1 changes his mind regarding services, staff to contact county with any changes. Will conduct annual meetings. Record review of Resident #1's PCSP dated 6/14/24 revealed the initial IDT meeting was held on 6/14/24. Attendees included Resident #1, LIDDA- Habilitation Coordinator, DON, DOR, MDS Coordinator A, MDS Coordinator B, and Resident #1's RP. The following NFSS were identified and confirmed: Customized Manual Wheelchair, Specialized Assessment OT, Specialized Assessment PT, Specialized Assessment ST, Specialized OT, Specialized PT and Specialized ST - all services were coded 2 indicated new.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 4:24 pm, with MDS Coordinator A and the DOR, MDS Coordinator A said the initial IDT meeting was held on 6/14/24. The DOR said Resident #1 was approved for PT, OT, and ST and Resident #1 refused all the evaluations. MDS Coordinator A said this was the first time they ran into a situation where the resident refused services, and she was not sure what to do with this situation. MDS Coordinator A said she contacted the PASRR representative from the Local Authority for guidance when the resident refused. MDS Coordinator A said initially Resident #1, and his RP were ok with the services offered but then Resident #1 refused. MDS Coordinator A said they had an annual meeting with Resident #1 recently and he refused again.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 9:15 am, with Resident #1, he said he refused services because he was going to get steroids to help him walk.During an interview on 12/30/25 at 9:04 am with Resident #1's RP, the RP said Resident #1 needed to see a psychiatrist because he had mental issues. The RP said she had trouble with Medicaid insurance because Resident #1's physician no longer takes his insurance.During an interview on (continued on next page) Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation. LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE TITLE (X6) DATE FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete Facility ID: If continuation sheet Page 1 of 2 Event ID: 676195 Printed: 05/15/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION 676195 B. Wing A. Building (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED 12/30/2025 NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE Falcon Point Post Acute 23553 West Fernhurst Drive Katy, TX 77494 For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F 0644 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete 12/30/25 at 10:37 am with MDS Coordinator A she said the DOR is normally responsible for submitting the NFSS form in the LTC portal. MDS Coordinator A said they discussed the NFSS form as a team and checked the portal daily to see if the NFSS form was approved. MDS Coordinator A said Resident #1 was able to make his own decisions. She said Resident #1 would probably benefit from the services, but they cannot force him to do anything.During an interview on 12/30/25 at 11:15 am with the Administrator, he said the MDS Coordinator, and the DOR were responsible for submitting the NFSS form. He said he thought the hiccup was when Resident #1 initially said yes to the services and then refused. The Administrator said there was no risk to Resident #1 because he had refused all services.Record review of the facility's PASRR policy not dated read in part . Ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs . Event ID: Facility ID: 676195 If continuation sheet Page 2 of 2

Reading this as a family member? Your long-term care ombudsman is a free advocate for residents and families.

Back to top

Citations

1 citation recorded*CMS

What do CMS severity letters mean?

Serious (G-L). Actual harm to a resident, or immediate jeopardy. Codes G through I indicate actual harm; J through L indicate immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety.

General (A-F). No actual harm found, or harm that is minimal. The facility must still submit a Plan of Correction. Most CMS citations land here.

Each letter combines severity with scope: how many residents the deficiency affected.

  • 0644GeneralS&S Dpotential for harm

    F644 - Coordination

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 30, 2025 survey of Falcon Point Post Acute?

This was a inspection survey of Falcon Point Post Acute on December 30, 2025. The surveyor cited 1 deficiency, recorded on the federal Form 2567 statement of deficiencies.

Were any deficiencies cited at Falcon Point Post Acute on December 30, 2025?

Yes, 1 deficiency was cited, each with a CMS Scope and Severity grade. The first was: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as neede..."

What type of survey was this?

This was a inspection survey conducted by state surveyors under federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) oversight. Findings are published on CMS Care Compare.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

Concerned about a resident’s care?Find your local ombudsman through the Eldercare Locatoror file a complaint with your state survey agency.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CMS Care Compare public records. Dataset last refreshed . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.